Bruce Momjian wrote:
We are on #postgresql on Efnet. Have been for years, and mentioned in
the FAQ. Very good for getting development help. I was working with
the PAM patch author there today.
Ugg. I'd rather setup a bot to relay to irc.openprojects.net. EFnet is
a sickly beast that can't
You guys shouldn't even be worrying about this. Five years from now,
MySQL will be a much more mature product, but the way I see it now is
this:
MySQL: Great for message boards (Slashdot), information retrieval (an
on-line phone directory that's mostly static), or other lightweight
At 03:21 PM 8/26/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
* There are far moore books in print on MySQL than on PostgreSQL.
O'Reilly, Sams, Que, and New Riders are all major publishers with books
about MySQL.
= MySQL is so hard to understand and poorly documented, a plethora of
books had to come out
At 09:28 AM 8/24/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the theoretical issue, can I use TEXT field to store binary ?
TEXT will not handle null (zero) bytes. If you are using a multibyte
character set, it will likely also do the wrong thing with byte
sequences
Lincoln Yeoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
= PostgreSQL does not allow you to access more than one database per
connection. This makes the system much safer and allows for more robust
design.
How does that makes things safer etc etc? I believe that this is a genuine
limitation.
It's unlikely
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Justin Clift writes:
If anyone else can see things blatantly wrong on that page, email me
about them and I'll ask Monty (the MySQL guy) to please
change/remove/fix them.
http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/y/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
Me writes:
http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/y/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
Many of these advantages can easily interpreted as disadvantages. For
example:
I hope people aren't taking that feature comparison page as seriously as
they took my parody of it.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL
OK, I have backed out that patch. Would you review that section of the
SGML and either commit a patch or send me one. Thanks.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:07:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I have applied the following patch. Interestingly, the SGML code
marked this block as
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Many of these advantages can easily interpreted as disadvantages. For
example:
Have you ever considered a career in marketting?
= In MySQL you have to repair your tables manually if corruption occurs.
PostgreSQL is coded so that corruption
YESSS, it seems to work now!!!
Thank you very very much!!! (of course everyone who tried to help)
only one thing:
regression test fails at 2 points
abstime ... FAILED
random ... failed (ignored)
the regression.diffs file looks:
***
10 matches
Mail list logo
