Under PostgreSQL 7.1.3 (RH Linux 7.1 platform) I get
the following whenever trying to manipulate large
objects either from psql or sql oriented API's (eg.
PoPy, psycopg, pypgsql (DPAPI kit)):
You must have Postgres superuser privilege to use
server-side lo_import. Anyone can use the client-side
More importantly, what is the situation on VACUUM for release 7.2?
It seems from the pgsql-hackers list that there are plans for
a none-exclusively locking VACUUM, e.g.:
More importantly, what is the situation on VACUUM for release 7.2?
It seems from the pgsql-hackers list that there are plans for
a none-exclusively locking VACUUM, e.g.:
hi
can anybody post a short example on how to use cursors (cursor-returning
functions to be exact) from postgresl 7.2?
depesz
--
hubert depesz lubaczewski http://www.depesz.pl/
... vows are spoken
Hi,
I am new to this mailing-list. I am having
Postgresql-7.0.2 installed on RedHat Linux-6.2. I
wanted to install Postgresql-7.1.2, since it supports
RedHat Linux6.2 and downloaded the rpms. While
installing, it ended up with the following error:
Failed dependencies:
libpg.so.2, libcrypto.so.0,
Il like lztext because it make a fast database with some big text fields. I
d'ont know why it removed in lastest release ?.
Any body can help me tu get and use it ?
Ngoc-Khoi TO.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe
Your solution sounds very interesting (Not the throw away NT
part...)...does anyone else have any input on this? Would it work well?
Any idea as to what amount of traffic it would be capable of handling?
If apache is only running in two instances, would that really keep the
number of ODBC
I'm trying to write a few functions in C for postgres. But, when I change
some code, I'm never sure that it'll be flushed when I do a;
DROP FUNCTION test();
CREATE FUNCTION test() RETURNS text AS '/var/lib/pgsql/functions/test.so' LANGUAGE
'c';
Is there a way to make sure ? Even restarting
Did you use speech marks around the column names when creating the tables?
If so that makes them case sensitive and you'll always need them (unless
there all lower case)
- Stuart
-Original Message-
From: William Winter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:29 AM
I have the exact opposite problem-- I keep turning off direct mailing for
pgsql-general (with successfull confirmation) and it keeps sending me mail
anyway! haha
culley
--- David Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Caley wrote:
Has anyone heard any more about this problem? I also haven't
On Monday 15 Oct 2001 13:35, Joseph Koenig wrote:
Your solution sounds very interesting (Not the throw away NT
part...)
That is where a signifficant part of the performance improvement would come
from, if performance was what you were after...
...does anyone else have any input on this?
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:18:41 + (UTC), John P. Looney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How well is postgres suited for small applications ?
I don't know it's architecture too well, though even with a very small
database, it seems to use a huge number of files, which are all quite
large, for
Question: If the postmaster has been enabled to support TCP/IP connections
using SSL, how do I need to modify my postgreSQL client app in order to
conduct an encrypted conversation? Currently, my app uses the postgreSQL C
API (libpq). Is the SSL functionality already supported in libpq?
Thanks,
where in the postgres dox can we find info abt the vacuum feature?
thx...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
14 matches
Mail list logo