Hello,
We are using a number of stored procedures that are called often from our
client programs. I include one here as an example. The problem we are seeing
is that when executing some of these that deal with a large number of
records, they begin execution and never return. The process handling
Hi,
Citing Fuchs Clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
is it possible to pass parameters to a SQL script, which I launch via the
psql shell?
yes
In Oracle it works like that:
sqlplus myscript.sql myschema
and within the script I can use the parameter like this:
CONCAT .
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 20:11, Glen Parker wrote:
Hmm, while you're at it, maybe you could make it accept wild
cards or regexp or something :-) That should allow you to toss
the -n parameter altogether (schema.*) if you wanted to.
It would also be at least as good, IMO, to accept only
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 08:30, Daniel Martini wrote:
Hello list,
Citing Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problem here is that the password can't be stored one-way-hash
digested, because the cleartext version is needed to be sent to the
server.
Actually why this is so has been a
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 16:26, Bob Parkinson wrote:
I've started to use the here document idea a lot when writing scripts to do tasks.
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
psql -d myDB EOSQL
select foo
update bar;
delete from ...
EOSQL
If the here document is long and complicated, you should
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 10:53, Andrew Hall wrote:
Hello,
We are using a number of stored procedures that are called often from our
client programs. I include one here as an example. The problem we are seeing
is that when executing some of these that deal with a large number of
records, they
Title: AW: [GENERAL] Pass parameters to SQL script
thanks for tip - I'm nearly happy now.
Now I want to concatenate a variable value with a hardcoded value in my script - something like:
CREATE TABLE :myValue + _the_hardcoded_string ..
Is this possible?
thanks,
For now i am almost statisfied with my tsearch2 installation war over night
somehow it seems to work, finally...
3 probably easy questions remain...
1.) Is it possible to index already filled tables?
2.)Can i have seperated indexes for different columns in a table
3.) Can i create an extra Table
Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anony Mous wrote:
select count(*) from pg_stat_activity
Do you have multiple live connections? My understanding of
pg_stat_activity is that it can lag slightly behind the current state of
the system.
If memory serves, it's up to 500 msec behind.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
would compile, when in fact it should not. (or am I totally wrong here?)
pl_exec.c has a exception label map which is used at execution, when the
exception actually happens.
Wouldn't it be preferable to use it at compile time?
That is on my to-do list. One question
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are using a number of stored procedures that are called often from our
client programs.
Are you somehow setting off an infinite recursion? How is this being
called?
I doubt it would be an infinite-recursion problem, as that would soon
lead to
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the password can't be stored hash-digested because it has to be
encrypted with a salt established at runtime. If you could just send
the same hash-digested password over and over, it would be no more
secure than a plaintext one.
[ looks at
Marcel,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Marcel Boscher wrote:
For now i am almost statisfied with my tsearch2 installation war over night
somehow it seems to work, finally...
what problems with installation ? Any additions,corrections to docs ?
3 probably easy questions remain...
1.) Is it possible
Thanks, Richard.
I've never seen this behaviour before in 7.4.3 and indeed it is the only
connection to the back end at the time when the count is occurring. However,
it would have had the connection for at least 30 seconds before requesting a
count.
Is there a better method of obtaining the
Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 15:39 schrieb Fuchs Clemens:
Now I want to concatenate a variable value with a hardcoded value in my
script - something like:
CREATE TABLE :myValue + _the_hardcoded_string ..
Option 1:
\set tmp :myValue 'hardcoded'
CREATE TABLE :tmp ...
Option 2:
CREATE
Hi,
Am Do, den 19.08.2004 schrieb Tom Lane um 16:44:
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the password can't be stored hash-digested because it has to be
encrypted with a salt established at runtime. If you could just send
the same hash-digested password over and over, it
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:53, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
Bit more info (from my own findings migrating from Oracle - Postgres)
Jobs - NO, (but scheduled tasks can be implemented in other ways)
There is a project on gborg (or maybe pgfoundry) called pgjobs which
aims to create an oracle like
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If myValue is double quoted, then the values will automatically be
concatenated by the backend parser, but for strange (SQL-standard) reasons
you need a line break in between.
That works for literals (single-quotes), but I don't think it applies
to
I'm putting 8.0 through its paces and here are a few
things I've noticed on the native win32 port running
on my workstation (2.0g p4 w/256 megs of ram).
Here is the output of vacuum verbose item:
INFO: vacuuming public.item
INFO: item: removed 246381 row versions in 24044
Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: the hash would suit better when used in a challenge authorization,
meaning the server sends a random key, let the client
hash(random_key || md5( cleartext_password || username ) )
and compare it on server with
hash(random_key ||
Is the memory freed up if you shut down and restart PostgreSQL? If not,
then it might not be PostgreSQL that's directly causing the issue, but
something like logging. What OS is this by the way?
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 15:10, Joe Lester wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Scott. I did a...
find
Magnus Hagander wrote:
8.0 beta1 does not run on Windows 2000 Terminal Server.
This is the http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pginstaller/ download from
08/09/2004. It ran OK for me on Win2K Pro, so I suspect this
is caused by
the terminal server stuff; I have experienced differences in
Hi,
I'm having intermittent problems connecting to my PostgreSQL database
from PHP, using Kerberos credentials forwarded from mod_auth_kerb.
- User authenticates via mod_auth_kerb,
(either Basic or Negotiate HTTP authenication)
- Kerberos credentials are stored in a file that lives for the
Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm putting 8.0 through its paces and here are a few
things I've noticed on the native win32 port running
on my workstation (2.0g p4 w/256 megs of ram).
Here is the output of vacuum verbose item:
DETAIL: CPU -1.-1612s/-1.99u sec elapsed 1434.79 sec.
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Marcel,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Marcel Boscher wrote:
For now i am almost statisfied with my tsearch2 installation war over night
somehow it seems to work, finally...
What does have tsearch2 that htdig doesn't have ( for index document I mean ) ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
Anony Mous wrote:
Thanks, Richard.
I've never seen this behaviour before in 7.4.3 and indeed it is the only
connection to the back end at the time when the count is occurring. However,
it would have had the connection for at least 30 seconds before requesting a
count.
Is there a better method of
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My other concern is the length of time that vacuum
runs when cost based vacuuming is disabled.
Are you sure you had cost-based vac disabled? I
tried to reproduce
your experiment here. I saw some degradation in
vacuuming speed
but not nearly as
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Marcel,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Marcel Boscher wrote:
For now i am almost statisfied with my tsearch2 installation war over night
somehow it seems to work, finally...
What does have tsearch2 that htdig doesn't have (
Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From looking at vacuum.c I gathered vacuum_cost_delay
must be 0 to enable the feature - correct?
Yeah, that's right --- delay=0 turns it off. Weird. Can anyone else
reproduce the problem?
regards, tom lane
Glen - can you confirm if this happens only on terminal server in
Application Mode or if it also affects Remote Administration Mode?
Can't confirm, I can only tell you that this particular one is in
application mode.
Glen
---(end of
Shelby Cain wrote:
I'm putting 8.0 through its paces and here are a few
things I've noticed on the native win32 port running
on my workstation (2.0g p4 w/256 megs of ram).
Here is the output of vacuum verbose item:
INFO: vacuuming public.item
INFO: item: removed 246381 row
Daniel Martini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now how would this work, if it would be possible to send hashed passwords
from libpq:
user sends username/password, this gets hashed by the cgi, then the hashed
value is sent by libpq. Session id is generated and
stored together with the hashed
s post [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently I posted notes on SERIALIZABLE transactions. In these notes I
state that one should use SELECT FOR UPDATE on all accessed data items to
execute SERIALIZABLE transactions. I now seem to have found a schedule
that cannot be serialized in this way.
Jeff Amiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I declared the compared value (draftid) as an int8, why should I have to
cast it as such in the query to cause the optimizer to use the primary key?
Seems like it should work (and it does work for me, in a quick test with
7.4.5). Could we see the full text
Julian Scarfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any views on when an 8.0 release is likely?
[ all together now... ] When it's ready.
Seriously, if I had to guess I'd say sometime between September and
December. It is too early in the beta cycle to be more specific than
that.
Hello,
is there any way to speedup queryes like
select ... from [table a] where [int field b] = [number] order by [datetime
field c] desc limit [number];
with index on field b I get something, but pgsql afterwards resolves to
sorting manually.
partial indices with index on field c where
Primoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any way to speedup queryes like
select ... from [table a] where [int field b] = [number] order by [datetime
field c] desc limit [number];
For reasonably-small values of the LIMIT, what you want is
(a) a two-column index on (b,c)
(b)
We use PostgresSQL 7.4 with JBoss without any trouble at all.
I believe the datasource samples that come with JBoss include a PG example.
We've found PostgreSQL to be an EXCELLENT companion to our Java server apps
(JBoss based J2EE, straight servlet, and Apple's WebObjects).
Hunter
From:
38 matches
Mail list logo
