> > Druid? http://druid.sourceforge.net/
>
> from reading the description, it looks like they might have something,
> but there is *no* documentation and i can't figure out how they want
> me to run the install jar file.
java -jar druid-3.5-install.jar
Bye, Chris.
---
Hi,
I was wondering if the .net connector for pgsql works fine on Visual C#
on PocketPC 2002/2003 too. Any comments on past experiences is truly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Fed
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
Tom,
We have been running pg_autovacuum on this entire DB so I did not even
consider that. I am running an analyze verbose now.
We should see about 82mm rows that will match the Filter: ((date_key >= 610)
AND (date_key <= 631))
I'll update in an hour or so.
--sean
On 9/27/04 11:49 PM, "Tom L
Sean Shanny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -> Seq Scan on f_pageviews t1 (cost=0.00..11762857.88
> rows=1 width=8)
> Filter: ((date_key >= 610) AND (date_key <= 631))
How many rows are actually going to match that filter condition? (The
symptoms seem
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 03:19:47PM -0400, Shawn Chisholm wrote:
>
> Hi, I am trying to deal with a deadlock situation caused by foreign
> key references on insert and I was wondering if anyone knows what
> order the foreign keys are locked (or evaluated) in for a particular
> table? Deferring the
To all,
Running into an out of memory error on our data warehouse server. This
occurs only with our data from the 'September' section of a large fact
table. The exact same query running over data from August or any prior
month for that matter works fine which is why this is so weird. Note that
J
I had a bunch of tables that had v_ prepended to their names. I've
renamed all of the tables so that they don't have that prefix anymore
so that v_address is now addresses. The name of this table's sequence
is still v_addresses_address_id_seq. This is fine except for the fact
that I'm using
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Robby Russell wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 16:29, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Its been almost 4 weeks since we've released Beta2, and there have been
enough improvements to the code to warrant a new Beta, to reduce the
number of "already fixed" bug reports.
For a complete list of c
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 16:29, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Its been almost 4 weeks since we've released Beta2, and there have been
> enough improvements to the code to warrant a new Beta, to reduce the
> number of "already fixed" bug reports.
>
> For a complete list of changes/improvement since Beta
Its been almost 4 weeks since we've released Beta2, and there have been
enough improvements to the code to warrant a new Beta, to reduce the
number of "already fixed" bug reports.
For a complete list of changes/improvement since Beta 1 was released, please
see:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/
This is the Problem:
I'm building a Large DataMart with a big
table and I want to improve the performace using aggregates I mean a set of
table that store some specific aggregacion of the main table, like materialized
views, I know that this feature is not implemented yet in postgres, And
Core dump on select from psql on AIX 5.x
I have the following task at hand -
A huge table, one of the column data has duplicated entries. I want to find
those duplicated records in this column -
select count(*), col-x from table-x group by col-x having count(*) >1;
Of course, the above query wi
On 27. sep 2004, at 22:08, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
Greg Stark wrote on 2004-09-27 08:17:
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:16:52 +0200, David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>> On a similar note, I've found myself wanting an extended '='
operat
Even simpler: COALESCE( a = b, a IS NULL AND b IS NULL )
-- Dean
Greg Stark wrote on 2004-09-27 08:17:
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:16:52 +0200, David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On a similar note, I've found myself wanting an extended '=' op
Hi, I am trying to deal with a deadlock situation caused by foreign key references on
insert and I was wondering if anyone knows what order the foreign keys are locked (or
evaluated) in for a particular table? Deferring the locks is unfortunately not a good
option for me...
Thanks,
Shawn
15 matches
Mail list logo
