My sysadmin has changed the values for shmall to 256MB
(268435456) and shmmax to 1GB (1073741824) and I
wonder if these values seem ok to you. We are working
on a linux system (2.4 kernel) and have 2 GB RAM at
our disposal. I have this large database running (15
million records).
Are there any
OK,
I have RTFM:-)
SHMALL Total amount of shared memory available (bytes
or pages) if bytes, same as SHMMAX; if pages,
ceil(SHMMAX/PAGE_SIZE)
These values should be the same. I've changed that
now.
Still my second question is valid though. Are there
any other values I should consider
Hi All!
I googled for a solution to my problem and then searched the PostgreSQL
site for solutions and since neither produced an answer I thought I'd
see if anyone else out there knows how to resolve my dilemna... Any
assistance is appreciated! Essentially what happens is that I just
Julian Scarfe wrote:
From: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- How can i select only the newest record for each ProdId ?
100| 2005-04-01
200| 2005-04-01
DISTINCT ON was made for this and on the similar tables I have
performs rather more efficiently than using a subquery.
select distinct on (ProdId)
log file it tells me to check before it deletes it in the rollback it says
repeatedly something about access is denied. Below is the actual install
log (or a small portion of it, near the end where the error occurs). Any
ideas?
Regards, Abe
p.s. this is a repost from my initial post on the
You'll probably want to take a look at this performance tuning
reference:
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
and this annotated configuration file:
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/annotated_conf_e.html
-tfo
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder,
My company's product is developing a product using postgres 7.4.6 on a
Linux 2.6.10 or 11 kernel, (don't have the exact version handy). We
do vacuum verbose analyze daily. Two days after the database was
created and loaded with a small amount of data (megabytes), the
postgres logs had this line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2005-04-16 00:00:53 ERROR: could not read block 52 of
relation idx_ef_hash: Input/output error
Googling didn't turn up useful information on this problem. Can anyone
tell me whether this error indicates a disk problem, OS problem, known
postgres bug, or
Hi,
I have installed PostgreSQL 8.0.1 on Solaris 9.
I am porting my database from Oracle 9i to PostgreSQL. I
am using PL/pgSQL language.
In Oracle we can get errormessagefrom SQLERRM
keyword and insert messages into log table.
How
can I get errormessage/error codein PostgreSQL
Dinesh Pandey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pls help me or send me some example.
Please do not post requests for help on pgsql-patches ... there is no
Postgres list on which they are further off-topic.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
10 matches
Mail list logo