Yuri B. Lukyanov wrote:
I have table:
and function:
But this thing don't work:
UPDATE test SET text2='test' WHERE id = (SELECT test1());
(rows affected: 0)
Why? There is two updates on the same row, but work only first update
(in the function). Maybe it's bug?
Hmm - PostgreSQL has a tran
Hi, Jeremy,
Have you tried PGadminIII? It's much easier to use.
To input a script, you can use psql
psql -h HOSTNAME -d DANAME -f FILENAME -U USERNAME
Changyu
--- jeremy ` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a bit of a newbie to postgres, but I managed to
> install 8.0.4 on my
> windows box and i
jeremy ` wrote:
I am a bit of a newbie to postgres, but I managed to install 8.0.4 on my
windows box and it mostly appears to be working fine;
I can set a primary key constraint, but when i try to set the foreign
key it requires a 'reference' - but there is nothing there to chose from.
I also
Thanks for the response Doug. I am frightened to upgrade the linux
machine to 8.0.3 at the moment because the server is live and I want to
make sure that 8.0.3 will fix it. I have extracted the relevant parts of
the restore as follows:
1. The restore command
pg_restore.exe -i -h 10.202.6.1
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:00 -0700, dong changyu wrote:
> Hi,
> A possible countermeasure on Windows platform,
> inspired by Magnus.Thanks ;)
> First we remove the passphrase from the key file,
> making it plain.
> Windows provides a feature "encrypted file system",
> provide transparent encryption/
Interestingly, this is the latest tsearch2 function that ships with
8.0.3 - note the slightly different syntax to the one below. It looks
like the compatibility issue is caused by this.
I shall try and modify the function in the 8.0.1 database, then try and
restore it to a 8.0.3 server and see w
On Jun 8, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Hrishikesh Deshmukh wrote:
Hi All,
How easy or difficult is it to get ggobi/xgvis working with
postgresql?!
Is it possible to write a query and send the output straight to
ggobi/xgvis without much work?
Any pointers.
I would think that you would need to constru
Hi Marco,
The problem I described in the first mail is that
because of some unknown reasons, if you save the
server.key file with a passphrase, you will be
prompted to enter the passphrase every time you start
the server AND a client make a connection, which
actually forbids us to use a passphrase
Hi,
i am using postgresql version 8.0.1 on Gentoo Linux and from time to time a
postgres process that is marked as idle - "postgres: user db IP(34079) idle"
- starts using 100% CPU. There is nothing in the logs, so i don't have a clue
what could be the problem.
Regards,
Jernej Kos.
--
Jernej
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 02:59 -0700, Changyu Dong wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> The problem I described in the first mail is that
> because of some unknown reasons, if you save the
> server.key file with a passphrase, you will be
> prompted to enter the passphrase every time you start
> the server AND a clien
Hello !
I have an Access database using linked tables on PG
8.0.3 (on Windows 2003 server).I use pgODBC 8.00.01.01.
Some tables appear
like deleted !In Access I see :
Categ : Tablevt_cat
vt_libcat
#Supprimé #Supprimé
#Supprimé #Supprimé
#Supprimé #Supprimé
#Supprimé
> The EFS encryption as you described it adds nothing but a
> false sense of security (and the ability to use some more
> buzzwords). The level of protection is just the same of a
> Unix file with the right permissions.
> The key point here is that both the 'postgres' user and
> 'administrator
--- Marco Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as the 'postgres' user has access to it w/o
> typing any password,
> that's only a detail. Unless someone physically
> steals your disk, the
> fact it's stored encrypted is irrelevant. The only
> thing that matters is
> who can access it, and
Hi Magnus,
You are right. My description is based on windows 2000
which is the weakest one.
Have the recovery key only available off-line is a
good practice. And if you don't want recovery agent,
backup the user's private key is also appropriate. It
can be done without effort. You don't need an arm
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > The EFS encryption as you described it adds nothing but a
> > false sense of security (and the ability to use some more
> > buzzwords). The level of protection is just the same of a
> > Unix file with the right permissions.
> > The ke
> > > The EFS encryption as you described it adds nothing but a false
> > > sense of security (and the ability to use some more
> buzzwords). The
> > > level of protection is just the same of a Unix file with
> the right
> > > permissions.
> > > The key point here is that both the 'postgres' u
I don't know, I just tested it on win32.
Changyu
--- Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (BTW, am I correct in reading this as a problem that
> only appears on
> win32, because of the exec nature of the backend,
> right? Or does it show
> up on Unix as well?)
>
> //Magnus
>
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 05:21 -0700, Changyu Dong wrote:
> --- Marco Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As long as the 'postgres' user has access to it w/o
> > typing any password,
> > that's only a detail. Unless someone physically
> > steals your disk, the
> > fact it's stored encrypted is i
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:04 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
[...]
> Yes, that is correct - runas is similar to su. But in order to do
> "runas", you need the service accounts password. Once you are "root" on
> a unix system, you can do "su - user" *without* the password. That's a
> big difference.
>
> > Yes, that is correct - runas is similar to su. But in order to do
> > "runas", you need the service accounts password. Once you
> are "root"
> > on a unix system, you can do "su - user" *without* the password.
> > That's a big difference.
> > (You can also use the postgres accounts smartcar
--- Marco Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either the Windows backup contains the private key
> of the user or not.
>
> If not, the backup is incomplete and useless (to get
> the file contents).
> You may get other files from it, but that's not the
> point. You may just
> not include the key
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:45:45PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> hi
> i have a stituation a situation where i have multiple tables, and multiple
> triggers on all of them.
> at least 1 or 2 triggers on at lease 4 different tables does updates to main
> cache table.
Do say, are there
Dear All,
I have a number of complex views for which the typical use is to select
exactly one row by id, e.g. "select * from V where id=nnn". Some of
these selects run orders of magnitude faster than others. Looking at
the output of "explain analyse" it seems that in the fast cases the
"id
[snip]
> Do say, are there foreign keys on those tables?
>
> If there are, that may explain the deadlocks. This is a known problem,
> fixed in the development version, for which there is no complete
Wow, that's a good news :-)
Time to drop that nasty patch we'r
Hi,
I try to deploy an Application with Oracle Database to a solution with
postgresql.
the Oracle system exists and we use a request which return an int in a
variable nb by "returning nb_lock into nb"
UPDATE xdb_ancestors_lock SET nb_lock=nb_lock+1 WHERE doc_id=?
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> [snip]
> > Do say, are there foreign keys on those tables?
> >
> > If there are, that may explain the deadlocks. This is a known problem,
> > fixed in the development version, for which there is no complete
>
GIROIRE, Nicolas (COFRAMI) wrote:
Hi,
I try to deploy an Application with Oracle Database to a solution
with postgresql. the Oracle system exists and we use a request which
return an int in a variable nb by "returning nb_lock into nb"
UPDATE xdb_ancestors_lock SET nb_lock=nb_lock+1 WHERE doc_id
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:53 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
[...]
> > > I guess we could read in the password ourselves and drop it in our
> > > shared memory segment to pass to subprocesses - though that
> > means they
> > > can get to the password easier as well. Assuming OpenSSL
> > has the AP
Richard Huxton writes:
> I'm not sure it's sensible to have the update in the WHERE clause - I
> don't know that you can depend on how many times that function will be
> called.
It's absolutely not very sensible to do that ... note the warnings in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/sql-e
Hi, i'm working with PostgreSQL for a long time (about three years), but
always on Linux box. But recently, I had to intall PostgreSQL on a WinXP
machine!
The installation works fine, although the starting service did not works in
the finalization of the installation! The installation was do
Howard Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interestingly, this is the latest tsearch2 function that ships with
> 8.0.3 - note the slightly different syntax to the one below. It looks
> like the compatibility issue is caused by this.
Read the 8.0.3 release notes ...
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2005, 16:30 +0200 schrieb GIROIRE, Nicolas
(COFRAMI):
> Hi,
>
> I try to deploy an Application with Oracle Database to a solution with
> postgresql.
> the Oracle system exists and we use a request which return an int in a
> variable nb by "returning nb_
Jernej Kos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am using postgresql version 8.0.1 on Gentoo Linux and from time to time a
> postgres process that is marked as idle - "postgres: user db IP(34079) idle"
> - starts using 100% CPU. There is nothing in the logs, so i don't have a clue
> what could be the p
IIRC there is no autocommit in postgresql itself, so the autocommit is
probably from whatever connection library/method you're using. Note that
PSQL does have an autocommit option, but I don't see how that would
affect this case.
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:12:26PM +0200, FERREIRA, William (COFRAMI
> > deploy an Application with Oracle Database to a solution with postgresql.
> > ...
> > UPDATE xdb_ancestors_lock SET nb_lock=nb_lock+1 WHERE doc_id=? AND >
> > ele_id=? returning nb_lock INTO nb;
> Looks like you really want:
>
> UPDATE xdb_ancestors_lock SET nb_lock=nextval('nb_lock_sequence'
Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a number of complex views for which the typical use is to select
> exactly one row by id, e.g. "select * from V where id=nnn". Some of
> these selects run orders of magnitude faster than others. Looking at
> the output of "explain analyse" it
> Hi, i'm working with PostgreSQL for a long time (about
> three years), but always on Linux box. But recently, I had to
> intall PostgreSQL on a WinXP machine!
> The installation works fine, although the starting service
> did not works in the finalization of the installation! The
> instal
Hello.
I have experoenced the same problem. It seems to be
common problem with Access connectiong to ODBC data source. It seems that Access
has some problems to determine primary key...
You should not use textual fields as primary key.
Insted, add some bigserial (integer autoincrement field
> We've been getting errors similar to the following (the specific large
> object that is "missing" is different every time) during our nightly
> pg_dump:
>
> pg_dump: dumpBlobs(): could not open large object: ERROR:
> inv_open: large
> object 48217896 not found
>
After doing a bunch of testin
Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have a number of complex views for which the typical use is to select
exactly one row by id, e.g. "select * from V where id=nnn". Some of
these selects run orders of magnitude faster than others. Looking at
the output of "explain
Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see anything in there about LEFT OUTER JOIN though. Any ideas?
Oh, I missed that part of your message. Hmm, I think the issue is that in
>> D join (M join G on (M.g=G.id)) on (D.id=M.b) where D.id=nnn
the planner deduces M.b=nnn by transitivi
Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
D join (M join G on (M.g=G.id)) on (D.id=M.b) where D.id=nnn
A possible workaround is to generate your query like
D left join (M join G on (M.g=G.id)) on (D.id=M.b AND M.b=nnn) where D.id=nnn
I don't suppose it would work if I did
Ron Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've been getting errors similar to the following (the specific large
> object that is "missing" is different every time) during our nightly
> pg_dump:
>
> pg_dump: dumpBlobs(): could not open large object: ERROR:
> inv_open: large object 48217896 not fo
Nope. I'm feeling a strong urge to go fix it for 8.1 though.
The question from the previous mail still stands: would anybody's
applications be broken if we change the MVCC behavior of large objects?
Could you provide an instance where it might? I had always assumed (I
know, never assume) th
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The question from the previous mail still stands: would anybody's
>> applications be broken if we change the MVCC behavior of large objects?
> Could you provide an instance where it might? I had always assumed (I
> know, never assume) that large ob
Just an update . . . I tried upgrading kernel to 2.6.11.11 (kernel.org) but was unsuccessful (due to i2c and gcc 4.0 issue). So I settled for the one on the fedora development repository. But that didn't help, upgraded other stuff too like selinux-policy-targeted and initscripts. Beginning to pull
I was just curious how you guys implement storage / calculation of
monetary data in postgresql. The docs say to use the numeric data
type, but I'm curious what precision is typically defined for storing
monetary data in the numeric data type.
Thanks for any info...
---(en
John Browne wrote:
I was just curious how you guys implement storage / calculation of
monetary data in postgresql. The docs say to use the numeric data
type, but I'm curious what precision is typically defined for storing
monetary data in the numeric data type.
We use numeric(10,2)
Sincerely
> It's curious to me that the following is fine:
>
> beginning of output=
> test=# select '1001'::bit varying;
> varbit
>
> 1001
> (1 row)
> end of output
Okay, I guess I'm not so curious, thanks to
http://www.post
I'm trying to interpret strings of Y's and N's as bit vectors and
perform bitwise ops on them. It's not working:
beginning of output=
test=# select version ();
version
Dianne Yumul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # chcon -u system_u -r object_r -t postgresql_log_t
> /home/postgres/pgstartup.log
> chcon: can't apply partial context to unlabeled file
> /home/postgres/pgstartup.log
> [but this works:]
> # chcon system_u:object_r:postgresql_log_t /home/postgres/pgsta
Hi-
Any general tips on using version control (CVS, SVN) while doing
database design? My thought was to do a text-mode dump (including
populated code tables) from PGAdmin.
How do people do this?
--
Peter Fein [EMAIL PROTECTED] 773-575-0694
Basically, if you're n
Many thanks for this very usefull
information.
Luc
- Original Message -
From:
Zlatko Matic
To: Ets ROLLAND ; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 6:52
PM
Subject: **SPAM** Re: [GENERAL] Pb with
linked tables on PG8
Hello.
I h
Up until the database goes into production,
keep files: schema.sql (table creation),
views.sql, functions.sql triggers.sql trigfunctions.sql
in cvs/svn.
Afterwards any changes to the schema are in
change01.sql, change02.sql,...
The change scripts hold the alter table statements
for schema changes
Peter Fein wrote:
Hi-
Any general tips on using version control (CVS, SVN) while doing
database design? My thought was to do a text-mode dump (including
populated code tables) from PGAdmin.
How do people do this?
Currently we just store a dump of the data structure. However, what I
think is
How would you handle the migration of the data with these user
scripts? Dump it to a temp table?
On 6/9/05, elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up until the database goes into production,
> keep files: schema.sql (table creation),
> views.sql, functions.sql triggers.sql trigfunctions.sql
> in cvs
Russ Brown wrote on 09.06.2005 23:12:
Currently we just store a dump of the data structure. However, what I
think is really needed is a specialist diff tool which works out the
commands needed to move from one schema to another. That would be
*extremely* useful, but would also probably require
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:43:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, next question: is this a bug fix we should back-patch into 7.4,
>> or just change it in HEAD?
> I guess apply only in HEAD, and provide the patch for MLikharev so he
> can solve his immedi
Thanks.
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:43:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, next question: is this a bug fix we should back-patch into 7.4,
>> or just change it in HEAD?
> I guess apply only in HEAD, and provide the patch for MLikharev so he
> can solve h
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Russ Brown wrote on 09.06.2005 23:12:
Currently we just store a dump of the data structure. However, what I
think is really needed is a specialist diff tool which works out the
commands needed to move from one schema to another. That would be
*extremely* useful, but wou
Windows XP SP2
Java SDK V1.4.2_08
JDBC 7.4.216.jdbc3
When I use now in an update it is giving me a very odd value in the
database. This is what PGAdminIII shows 2005-06-09 13:52:46.259715
I am not expecting the decimal seconds. I am getting an out of range
error in java when I read the column.
Dear Experts,
Here is another "how can I rewrite this to go faster" idea.
I have two tables T1 and T2 and a view V that is the UNION ALL of T1 and
T2. The tables have an editdate field, and I want to get the n most
recently changed rows:
select * from V order by editdate desc limit 40;
T
PG Lightning Admin also has function version control.
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
Russ Brown wrote:
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Russ Brown wrote on 09.06.2005 23:12:
Currently we just store a dump of the data structure. However, what
I think is really needed is a specialist diff tool which
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:05 +, Matt Miller wrote:
> I'm trying to interpret strings of Y's and N's as bit vectors and
> perform bitwise ops on them.
Well, I ended up writing a bunch of code to accomplish what I initially
thought would be just some casting and bitops on built-in types. I
reall
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:12:25PM +0100, Russ Brown wrote:
> Peter Fein wrote:
> >Hi-
> >
> >Any general tips on using version control (CVS, SVN) while doing
> >database design? My thought was to do a text-mode dump (including
> >populated code tables) from PGAdmin.
> >
> >How do people do this?
>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:16:46PM -0500, John Browne wrote:
> How would you handle the migration of the data with these user
> scripts? Dump it to a temp table?
>
If your scripts are correct, you should be able to load
your base scripts and apply each change script in order
and have the result
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:18:27PM +, Matt Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:05 +, Matt Miller wrote:
> > I'm trying to interpret strings of Y's and N's as bit vectors and
> > perform bitwise ops on them.
>
> Well, I ended up writing a bunch of code to accomplish what I initially
>
> > I ended up writing a bunch of code to accomplish what I initially
> > thought would be just some casting and bitops on built-in types.
> I imagine you could have done something involving textout() and
> varbit_in(), like
>
> alvherre=# select varbit_in(textout(translate('YYNY', 'YN', '10')),
Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I presume that PostgreSQL doesn't try to push the limit clause into the
> subqueries of a UNION ALL in this way. I believe it is safe, isn't it?
Hmm. You don't actually want to push the LIMIT as such into the subplan
--- that would create an extra lev
Hello !
Is there any way to set all elements in a long boolean array (bool[]) to
the same value ?
update testbool set "all elements" = false;or so ? ;)
Any ideas ?
Thanks
/Otto Blomqvist
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is
Greetings!
Is there an issue when a large number of INHERITS tables exist for
planning?
We have 2 base tables, and use INHERITS to partition the data. When we get
around 2000-2200 sub-tables (approx 1000-1100 per base table), planning a
SELECT statement on the base table (ie, to search all sub-ta
On Jun 10, 2005, at 7:07 AM, David Siebert wrote:
When I use now in an update it is giving me a very odd value in the
database. This is what PGAdminIII shows 2005-06-09 13:52:46.259715
I am not expecting the decimal seconds. I am getting an out of
range error in java when I read the column.
On Jun 10, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
A short term solution would be to update the column using something
like update foo set foo_timestamp = date_trunc(foo_timestamp).
Sorry. That isn't clear (or correct!) Complete example at the bottom
of the email.
UPDATE foo
SET fo
Phil,
If you complete this patch, I'm very interested to see it.
I think I'm the person Matthew is talking about who inserted a sleep
value. Because of the sheer number of tables involved, even small
values of sleep caused pg_autovacuum to iterate too slowly over its
table lists to be of u
Hi,
Help me please to resolve the problem:
Just After commiting transaction - writing ,say 90 rows,I try to select
the same 90 rows - and get wrong set of rows (some of them: 1-2 replaced
by unknown data). But after 10-20 seconds the result of selecting
the neccessary 90 rows return right result.
Hi!
>Done. Here is the patch (against CVS tip, but it should apply with
>some fuzz in 8.0 or 7.4).
Is this patch about CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT only,
or about SELECT INTO TEMP TABLE as well?
--
Best regards
Ilja Golshtein
---(end of broadcast)---
Edmund Dengler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there an issue when a large number of INHERITS tables exist for
> planning?
Well, there are a number of issues whenever a single query references
a whole lot of tables in any fashion. It's only with Neil Conway's
rewrite of the List package in 8.0 t
URL doesn't work!
I confirm my account
-- Réacheminé par Frederic Germaneau/FR/BULL sur
10/06/2005 08:09 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@postgresql.org sur 09/06/2005 00:01:26
Envoyé par : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : pgsql-general@postgresql.org
cc :
Obje
On 6/9/05, elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:16:46PM -0500, John Browne wrote:
> > How would you handle the migration of the data with these user
> > scripts? Dump it to a temp table?
> >
>
> If your scripts are correct, you should be able to load
> your base scripts a
79 matches
Mail list logo
