Hi,
Are there any plans to make CREATE USER local to a database? (as opposed
to CLUSTER scope, as it is today)
So that in such cases as Benjamin's, the ISP could satisfy customer
requests by createing and handing over the new database instance within
the managed cluster? Even with the unrestricte
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I set up a user so that Bob can update his records, without letting
> Bob update Jane's records? Is it possible, say with a view or some other
> intermediate data type?
It's not hard to give them access to *view* their records using a view.
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> How can I set up a user so that Bob can update his records, without letting
> Bob update Jane's records? Is it possible, say with a view or some other
> intermediate data type?
You can use a VIEW to select all rows for CURRENT_USER, and then create
We have a growing ASP-hosted application built on PHP/Postgres 8.1, and are
getting requests from clients to manipulate the databases more directly.
However, the structure of our databases prevents this from happening readily.
Assume I have two tables configured thusly:
create table customers
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when Christopher Browne <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A number of groups gather at different times at Toronto's Linux Caffe;
> the first Thursday of the month seems an opportune time for this, and
> the next incidence of that is next Thursday, June 1st.
And oo
David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Robert. Actually, I noted that each time I ran my backup
> script, the OID mentioned in the error was bigger than previous number.
That's fairly interesting, but can you provide a self-contained test
case? The reindexdb script really doesn't do a
I had intended to try to "organize" some form of Toronto PostgreSQL
'user group'; some challenges have gotten in the way of having that be
at all "large scale," but it certainly makes sense to try to get local
people interested in PostgreSQL together every so often.
A number of groups gather at di
It really isn't neccessary. That said, there is *something* going on with your
db, so it might be prudent to figure out what it is.
Thanks, Robert. Actually, I noted that each time I ran my backup
script, the OID mentioned in the error was bigger than previous number.
Before I run the re
On Thursday 25 May 2006 19:34, David Wall wrote:
> Rats! I found nothing But just for grins, I ran the reindexdb
> program a second time, and this time it reported a different OID, higher
> than the previous. I know we didn't change the template1 database other
> than using it when creating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | addslashes() or magic_quotes. We note that these tools have been
>> deprecated
>> | by the PHP group since version 4.0.
>
>> Can anyone provide a source for the statement?
>
> I'm not going to put words in Josh's mouth about where h
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I write this I am creating an index with gist and trying to do a select
> on the table froze. Using Postgresql 8.1.3
CREATE INDEX shouldn't block any concurrent SELECT, regardless of which
index AM is involved. Can you provide a reproducible test
Rats! I found nothing But just for grins, I ran the reindexdb
program a second time, and this time it reported a different OID,
higher than the previous. I know we didn't change the template1
database other than using it when creating new databases, creating
users, tablespaces, etc.
My
The release notes for 8.1, http://www.postgresql.org/docs/whatsnew, states
about GIST
indexing mechanism has improved to support the high-speed concurrency,
recoverability and update performance
As I write this I am creating an index with gist and trying to do a select
on the table froze. Us
On fim, 2006-05-25 at 11:52 -0700, P.M wrote:
> I would like to know how can i move from 1 database to another one ?
>
> basically i want to run a *.sql script in which i connect under a
> particular database (for example : template1 or postgres) and my *.sql
> script should create a new database
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:41:34PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On May 25, 2006, at 1:52 PM, P.M wrote:
> >I would like to know how can i move from 1 database to another one ?
> >
> >basically i want to run a *.sql script in which i connect under a
> >particular database (for example : template1 or
Em Quinta 25 Maio 2006 19:33, Jim Nasby escreveu:
>
> Only helps if the OP is willing to run on HEAD; grant on sequence is
> not in 8.1 (at least not according to the docs).
>
> As for triggers, I don't really see how that would make any sense.
A trigger could start some modification in a table wh
Em Quinta 25 Maio 2006 19:27, Jim Nasby escreveu:
>
> Yes. Views essentially end up with schemas hard-coded into them. If
> that doesn't work you should be able to create views on set returning
> functions, though that's obviously more work.
>
> I don't know how hard it would be to allow views to b
On May 25, 2006, at 1:52 PM, P.M wrote:
I would like to know how can i move from 1 database to another one ?
basically i want to run a *.sql script in which i connect under a
particular database (for example : template1 or postgres) and my
*.sql script should create a new database (for examp
On May 24, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:59:06 +0300,
Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a related note, which objects need to be GRANTed specifically?
There is a saying that following objects can have permissions
GRANTed:
1. TABLE
2. DATABASE
3.
On May 23, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Jorge Godoy wrote:
a) We are with some restricted search_path set (e.g. after "SET
search_path TO
schema_1") and we make a "SELECT * FROM base.view". What we're
seeing is
that views are tied to the schema where they were created, no
matter if
they are o
David,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:07:27PM -0700, David Wall wrote:
> >object. Look in template1 and see if you see a table with that OID.
> Thanks, but I clearly lack that expertise. How do I find "a table with
> that OID"?
Do a normal select against pg_class. Something like:
select oid, rel
(repost to newsgroup since the other went directly to Mr. Lane's email
address)
I think you've done something to template1,
even though you say you
haven't. Out-of-the-box, an 8.1.3 database won't have any OIDs
assigned
above about 11000, so OID 41675 would have to belong to a user-crea
David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I create a brand new database and then run the reindexdb program
> under PG 8.1.3, I get the follow error:
> reindexdb: reindexing of database "" failed: ERROR: could not open
> relation with OID 41675
> I'm not sure what this error is since we
When I create a brand new database and then run the reindexdb program
under PG 8.1.3, I get the follow error:
reindexdb: reindexing of database "" failed: ERROR: could not open
relation with OID 41675
I'm not sure what this error is since we have not even added any data
yet. Is this so
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 20:27 +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Rafal Pietrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here I'm just not interested in that procedure outcome: if it eventually
> > COMMITED or ROLLED-BACK. But obviously I am interested in consistancy of
> > database, when the detached p
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
On 5/25/06, Rafal Pietrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, exactly "not being interested in the outcome" is IMHO the reason
> why your demands clash with archtecture of a RDBMS. Most RDBMS go a
long
> way to ensure consistency and safety of your data, once they promised
Hi,I would like to know how can i move from 1 database to another one ?basically i want to run a *.sql script in which i connect under a particular database (for example : template1 or postgres) and my *.sql script should create a new database (for example : test) and after execute several SQL comm
On 5/25/06, Rafal Pietrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, exactly "not being interested in the outcome" is IMHO the reason
> why your demands clash with archtecture of a RDBMS. Most RDBMS go a long
> way to ensure consistency and safety of your data, once they promised
> (usually by not raisin
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:49 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > 'technical' need for him/her to create the server side proces *provided*
> > hi/she can setup a job *within* the database server itself, and just go
> > away.
> Well, exactly "not being interested in the outcome"
Okay, there was no core dump to be found.
I had to revert back to 8.1.3 which seems to be running fine. I am /extremely/
thankful that there was no data corruption.
I took a 24 hour old dumpfile of the database it was crashing on and I restored
it to a similar AMD64 box (SunFire x2100 instead of
Does anybody know when postgresql 8.1 will be considered stable on
gentoo for x86?
Gentoo, as a community-based distro with a unique perspective, usually
seems to lag behind even important upgrades as 8.14. On 86 platform, it
should be ok, although I would bring in code from postgresql and just
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 13:36 +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
My understanding of Listen/Notify is that it is a completely
disconnected process running on the database server.
Yes. But In my particular case (and I presume, the intention of
'bacground triggers' is that) a programmer
CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't find a core dump.
>
> Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong spot or for the wrong file. The file should
> be
> called "core.32140", correct? ... I did a "find / -name core*" ... that found
> nothing useful.
find / -name '*core*' would be more reliable. Free
I didn't find a core dump.
Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong spot or for the wrong file. The file should be
called "core.32140", correct? ... I did a "find / -name core*" ... that found
nothing useful.
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2006-05-25 08:3
CG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2006-05-25 08:30:50.076 EDT LOG: server process (PID 32140) was terminated
> by signal 11
That should be leaving a core dump file (if not, restart the postmaster
under "ulimit -c unlimited"). Get a stack trace with gdb to get some
more info about what's going o
"surabhi.ahuja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <2006-05-24 16:21:28 CDT%>LOG: database system was shut down at =
> 2006-05-24 16:01:00 CDT
> <2006-05-24 16:21:28 CDT%>LOG: record with zero length at 0/AC92BC
> <2006-05-24 16:21:28 CDT%>LOG: invalid primary checkpoint record
> <2006-05-24 16:21:28
On May 25 11:04, Richard Huxton wrote:
> surabhi.ahuja wrote:
> >hi,
> >i am getting the following error messages:
> >
> ><2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: Address
> >already in use
> ><2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>HINT: Is another postmaster already running on
> >port 543
Upgrading from 8.1.3 to 8.1.4, I compiled with the same configure flags,
installed to a separate directory, shut down 8.1.3, copied the "data" directory
over to the new 8.1.4 directory (cp -Rp), set my symlinks so that
/usr/local/pgsql points to the new 8.1.4 directory, and fired it up. I ran
some
How does your hibernate mapping look like? Especially your generator tag...
BTJ
On Thu, 25 May 2006 16:09:22 -
"xuemei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
>
> I have a java application that starts several processes to retrieve data and
> store them into the database tables;
>
> Whe
Tim Allen wrote:
Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:55:51 +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
Does anybody know when postgresql 8.1 will be considered stable on
gentoo
for x86?
No, maybe ask in gentoo-users or -dev? Anyway just because it's not
marked
"stable" does not mean it isn't.
Hello:
I have a java application that starts several processes to
retrieve data and store them into the database tables;
When I run this on winXP and with Hibernate/Mysql,
everything looks ok.
Now I need to use postgresql, so I change the hibernate
configuration file.
When I run the
--- Begin Message ---
lists
Saludos,
Resulta que el tiempo de ejecución obtenido en una maquina HP DL380 con
2 procesadores Xeon de 3.6 Gh y 4G de memoria con el siguiente comando
"cat nombrearchivo.gz | gunzip | psql nombrebd -f -" es de 4 horas...
este mismo Proceso en una maquina de DL580 c
Ok, that's a good point. I overlooked the possibility of this
considering that I didn't think the timestamp resolution was that high.
I changed my rules and constraints on tables to take care of this case.
Thanks.
However, how does this affect the problem I having considering that
inserts that wer
hi, all. thanks for the replies.
yes, i meant 'columns' not 'rows'. sorry if i made you a bit confused.
my explanation should've been more descriptive than that i suppose.
anyway, it's good to know that postgresql guarantees the column order.
i was just trying to be double-safe before i mess up w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jerry Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% = \set date `date '+%Y%m%d'`
%
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% = \echo :date
% 20060524
%
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% = \echo foo_:date
% foo_:date <-- Was expecting this to expand... see below
variables need to b
Your mailserver seems to be borked Richard:
dev@archonet.com on 25/05/2006 11:49
The message cannot be delivered due to a configuration error on the
server. Please contact your Administrator.
< s1.uklinux.net #5.3.0 X-Unix; 73>
Regards, Dave
---(end of broadcast)-
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:29 +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > consuming housekeeping. Like a cleanup - always succeeds, even if
> > sometimes is not really necesary (like in case of main rolling-back).
> >
> A somewhat limited use-case to form generic database functionality
surabhi.ahuja wrote:
hi,
i am getting the following error messages:
<2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: Address already in use
<2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>HINT: Is another postmaster already running on port
5432? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
<2006-05-24 15:28:0
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:33 +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger:
Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction.
A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: "do a fork: fork-1) return to the
main and s
Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:55:51 +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
Does anybody know when postgresql 8.1 will be considered stable on gentoo
for x86?
No, maybe ask in gentoo-users or -dev? Anyway just because it's not marked
"stable" does not mean it isn't. It's very unfortunate t
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:14:46PM -0700, Nishad Prakash wrote:
> I want to create a new database with the exact schema of an existing one,
> but a different name. After some reading, it seems
>
> pg_dump -s old_db > old_schema
> createdb -t old_schema new_db
Now new_db is a 1:1 copy of old_sche
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:21 +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Rafal Pietrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger:
> >
> > Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction.
> >
> > A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: "do a fork: fork-1)
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:55:51 +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
> Does anybody know when postgresql 8.1 will be considered stable on gentoo
> for x86?
No, maybe ask in gentoo-users or -dev? Anyway just because it's not marked
"stable" does not mean it isn't. It's very unfortunate that distributions
have ado
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:33 +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger:
> >
> > Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction.
> >
> > A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: "do a fork: fork-1) return to the
> > main and s
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger:
Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction.
A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: "do a fork: fork-1) return to the
main and schedule COMMIT there, fork-2) continue in bacground".
And what if fork-1) return
On 5/25/06, Rafal Pietrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger:
Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction.
A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: "do a fork: fork-1) return to the
main and schedule COMMIT there, fork-2) continue in bacground
hi,
i am getting the following error
messages:
<2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket:
Address already in use<2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>HINT: Is another
postmaster already running on port 5432? If not, wait a few seconds and
retry.<2006-05-24 15:28:08 CDT%>WARNING: could
57 matches
Mail list logo
