But I don't understand why there are changes of the databases
template1 and
template0 at all?
I thought they are only templates.
I don't think that there were any changes to the template databases.
You detected a difference in age(datfrozenxid) - try selecting
datfrozenxid
itself and you
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Feb 18, 2007, at 20:29 , Karsten Hilbert wrote:
What I don't understand, however, is exactly *why* date_trunc is not
immutable ?
I believe it's because the result of date_trunc depends on the time zone
setting for the session.
I understand the reasoning,
On Feb 19, 2007, at 18:04 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Feb 18, 2007, at 20:29 , Karsten Hilbert wrote:
What I don't understand, however, is exactly *why* date_trunc is not
immutable ?
I believe it's because the result of date_trunc depends on the
time zone
On Feb 18, 2007, at 23:12 , Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:19:43PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
What I don't understand, however, is exactly *why* date_trunc is
not immutable ?
I believe it's because the result of date_trunc depends on the time
zone setting for the
Robert Haas wrote:
So, I have the following problem.
Suppose you have two kinds of animals, sheep and wolves. Since they
have very similar properties, you create a single table to hold both
kinds of animals, and an animal_type table to specify the type of each
animal:
CREATE TABLE
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 18:04 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Feb 18, 2007, at 20:29 , Karsten Hilbert wrote:
What I don't understand, however, is exactly *why* date_trunc is not
immutable ?
I believe it's because the result of date_trunc
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 09:59 -0500, John DeSoi wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Kirkness wrote:
I am currently setting up a website and have PostGreSQL database
I'm using for the backend. I'm researching an open source Content
Management System that uses PostGreSQL. Do you
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:16:12AM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
What I'm trying to say is not that it _is_ immutable, but that it
_behaves_ immutable (under said conditions).
This could imply that if a certain condition is available in a query on
which such a function operates, it would
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:36:36AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:16:12AM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
What I'm trying to say is not that it _is_ immutable, but that it
_behaves_ immutable (under said conditions).
This could imply that if a certain condition
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of elein
Sent: zondag 18 februari 2007 23:16
To: Robert Haas
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] complex referential integrity constraints
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:58:56AM -0500, Robert
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:58:50AM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I'll solve it with a date_trunc_utc() wrapper.
It should be noted the date_truc(timestamptz) is not immutable, whereas
date_trunc(timestamp) is. Thus you should be able to make an index on:
date_trunc(
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:03:07PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
date_trunc( timestamptz_column AT TIME ZONE 'UTC', 'foo' )
Ah, that makes it clear *why* this should work.
I would assume to get meaningful results from a query using
that index I'd have to normalize input timestamps to UTC,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:53:15PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Well, your queries need to use the same form, ie:
SELECT blah FROM foo
WHERE date_trunc( 'entered_timestamp'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'UTC', 'foo' )
Thought so.
That seems a bit error prone though, so your idea of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Scott Ribe wrote:
Oh. Yea, I can see that, but even if the endian-ness is the same, it
still might not work. Even a different compiler flag will cause a
failure to run properly.
Sure. You can't flag every possible error. But my Intel PPC Macs look
On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
Don't forget to CC: the list
Jerry LeVan wrote:
Is there an elegant way I can merge/update the two tables so that
they will contain the same information ( with no duplicates or
omissions)?
It sounds like you'll want some form of
Alban Hertroys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'm trying to say is not that it _is_ immutable, but that it
_behaves_ immutable (under said conditions).
This could imply that if a certain condition is available in a query on
which such a function operates, it would behave immutable.
Right, but
Hello,
Is there a way to attach roles to only certain databases so that the login
[from PHP pg_connect(username, password, database)] is tied to that
particular database and any creation of roles (users/groups) can be
constrained into that particular database.
I plan to use the roles system to
Hello List,
I work with PostgreSQL 8.2.3 on a IA-64 server with Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 4 AS update 2 and I am looking for the RPM
compat-postgresql-libs-4-2 associated.
Unfortunately, I didn't find it on
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/, even in the RPM available for the
8.2.1 release
I have a Perl script that runs every night and updates a local Pg
database, sitting on a Linux server. (I'll refer to this database as
mydb in the following.)
The update process takes about 1 hour, so the script first builds a
temporary database called mydb_tmp. Once mydb_tmp is built and
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:10:55AM -0500, Kynn Jones wrote:
The script is quite solid and has been performing flawlessly for
several months now, with one exception: it fails irrecoverably
whenever some user forgets to disconnect from mydb at the time that
the script attempts to delete it (or
Why irrecoverably? If the command fails, you just wait and try it
again.
You could use the pg_stat tables to work out who is connected and use
pg_cancel_backend() to kill them. You could kill -INT them yourself.
You could change the pg_hba.conf to forbid logging in and then bouncing
the
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Kirkness wrote:
I am currently setting up a website and have PostGreSQL database
I'm using for the backend. I'm researching an open source Content
Management System that uses PostGreSQL. Do you have any
recommendations?
You need to define what you
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Kirkness wrote:
I am currently setting up a website and have PostGreSQL database I'm
using for the backend. I'm researching an open source Content
Management System that uses PostGreSQL. Do you have any recommendations?
You need to
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:58:56AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
So, I have the following problem.
Suppose you have two kinds of animals, sheep and wolves. Since they
have very similar properties, you create a single table to hold both
kinds of animals, and an animal_type table to specify the
Hi,
you could let the script look into the output of ps aux. Open idle
connections are usually show like this:
postgres 18383 0.0 0.6 18596 4900 ?Ss 16:38 0:00 postgres: dbuser
database hostname(39784) idle in transaction
Then you can simply collect the PIDs and kill these
I'd do something like this:
CREATE TABLE animal_type (
animal_name TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
CHECK(animal_name = trim(animal_name))
);
/* Only one of {Wolf,wolf} can be in the table. */
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX just_one_animal_name
ON animal_type(LOWER(animal_name));
CREATE TABLE
I have a large table (~55 million rows) and I'm trying to create an index
and vacuum analyze it. The index has now been created, but the vacuum
analyze is failing with the following error:
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request of size 943718400.
I've played with several settings, but
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:29:17 +0100,
Karsten Hilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The date-of-birth field in our table holding patients is of
type timestamp with time zone. One of our patient search
queries uses the date-of-birth field to find matches. Since
users enter day, month, and year
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 12:47 -0600, John Cole wrote:
I have a large table (~55 million rows) and I'm trying to create an index
and vacuum analyze it. The index has now been created, but the vacuum
analyze is failing with the following error:
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:02:08AM +0100, Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical Gonzo
journalism.
There is, but it's not the sort of word one uses in polite company
;-)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:41:11PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Karsten Hilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The date-of-birth field in our table holding patients is of
type timestamp with time zone. One of our patient search
queries uses the date-of-birth field to find matches. Since
On Feb 19, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Legault wrote:
Is there a way to attach roles to only certain databases so that
the login [from PHP pg_connect(username, password, database)] is
tied to that particular database and any creation of roles (users/
groups) can be constrained into that
amigo en este enlace te explican paso a paso como instalar postgresql, yo
tengo debian e instale postgre 8.2.1 siguiendo los pasos de dicho link. a
ver que te parece:
http://www.postgresql.org.mx/?q=node/9
From: Edwin Quijada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merhaba,
PlanetPostgreSQLi incelerken şu örnek gözüme çarptı
Greg Sabino Mullane
Determining which rows in a table are locked
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION isrowlocked(text,text,text)
RETURNS BOOL
LANGUAGE plpgsql
VOLATILE
STRICT
AS
$gsm$
DECLARE
myst TEXT;
BEGIN
myst = 'SELECT 1 FROM
Hello,
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:49 +0100, DANTE Alexandra wrote:
Where can I find the RPM compat-postgresql-libs-4-2 for RHEL4-AS and IA-64 ?
Those libs are extracted from 8.1.X RPMs and put together to form an RPM
package.
If you can build and send us 8.1.8 RPMs, I can build and upload that
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 20:48:07 +0100,
Karsten Hilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What time of day were you born ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apgar
What is the technical reason that makes you wonder ?
Because it would make doing the queries simpler.
If you aren't collecting the
We updated our production server to postgresql 8.2.3 yesterday. This
query is giving different results than on our development box:
development:
# select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0;
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
production
# select ((now() - '1
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:28:01PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
What is the technical reason that makes you wonder ?
Because it would make doing the queries simpler.
If you aren't collecting the data, it doesn't make sense to deal with the
extra headaches involved with pretending you know
Tom Allison wrote:
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
On Friday 16. February 2007 07:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps this
paper can be described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of
required runway length.
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical
Gonzo journalism. The
On 2/16/2007 1:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
extra points, use *only one* test case. Perhaps this paper can be
described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of required
runway length.
Oh, this one wasn't about raw speed of trivial single table statements
like all the others?
Jan
--
Hi,
I have had a look around but I have not found any documentation on
pgPL/SQL. I know it is meant to be similar to Oracle's PL/SQL but as I
don't know PL/SQL so that does not do me any good.
If there is documentation for pgPL/SQL it would be nice to see it as
part of the documentation for the
Ivan Wills wrote:
Hi,
I have had a look around but I have not found any documentation on
pgPL/SQL. I know it is meant to be similar to Oracle's PL/SQL but as I
don't know PL/SQL so that does not do me any good.
If there is documentation for pgPL/SQL it would be nice to see it as
part of
I have a question about the query optimizer of a postgres.
As long as I understood through a postgres manual, the postgres query
optimizer is implemented using a *genetic algorithm.*
I'm thinking to modify the query optimizer.
Are there any postgres version which uses typical dynamic
jungmin shin escribió:
I have a question about the query optimizer of a postgres.
As long as I understood through a postgres manual, the postgres query
optimizer is implemented using a *genetic algorithm.*
There is an algorithm said to be genetic, but it only kicks in with
big joins; 12
Csaba Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And pg_stat will only show you running queries, not the idle
connections.
Nonsense. pg_stat_activity + kill -TERM should solve this problem
reasonably well. Some of us don't trust kill -TERM 100%, which is why
it's not currently exposed as a standard
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:52:51AM -0800, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
I'd do something like this:
CREATE TABLE animal_type (
animal_name TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
CHECK(animal_name = trim(animal_name))
);
/* Only one of {Wolf,wolf} can be in the table. */
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX
Hello,
I need a way to sync a postgres view with a table on a Windows CE device.
The table will be read only on the mobile device. I am seeking to replace an
access database that syncs a table with a pocket pc table via active sync. I
would really like to use postgres for the desktop side of
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0;
?column?
--
f -- looks busted to me
(1 row)
If you'd casted to timestamptz then I'd agree this is busted.
As-is, it might have something to do with your timezone setting,
which
48 matches
Mail list logo
