On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:17:10AM +0900, EBIHARA, Yuichiro wrote:
Hi,
Can I get a PostgreSQL Installer for Windows x64(EM64T)?
That for 32bit Windows is available at http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/win32/
but I need x64 native
version.
There is no such thing. PostgreSQL 64-bit is currently
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 03:09, Bob Pawley wrote:
Thanks
Does one version of ODBC work for all versions of Excel and Postgresql.
I am wanting to transfer one or two tables from Excel and manipulate the
information in Postgresql then transfer the results back to Excel as a
single table.
I
My Question:
How can I do OLD.columnName != NEW.columnName if I don't know what the
columnNames are at Compile Time?
I have the columnName in a variable.
I suggest you use plpython. In this case you'll be able to do it.
TD['old'][colNameVar] != TD['new'][colNameVar]
--
Regards,
Sergey
Magnus,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Can I get a PostgreSQL Installer for Windows x64(EM64T)?
That for 32bit Windows is available at
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/win32/ but I need x64 native version.
There is no such thing. PostgreSQL 64-bit is currently only
supported on Unix
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
INSERT INTO accounts_receivable_receipts (accounts_receivable_id,
receipt_id)
VALUES (2, 1), (4, 3), (6, 1), (5, 3);
I have not done much accounting-style design, and I don't think this is
really the best way to set these up (for example, I think it's a bit odd
to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:31:40PM +0900, EBIHARA, Yuichiro wrote:
Magnus,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Can I get a PostgreSQL Installer for Windows x64(EM64T)?
That for 32bit Windows is available at
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/win32/ but I need x64 native version.
There
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My database has shutdown several times in the last couple days. I have
no
idea why. I am running centos and I have not rebooted the server or
made
any configuration changes.
Oh, I forgot. You do have plenty of swap space compared to RAM,
Andrew Maclean wrote:
I got no answer so I am trying again.
In a nutshell, if I have a recrusive relationship as outlined below, how
do I implement a rule for the adjustments table that prevents the entry
of an Id into the Ref column if the id exists in the Id column and vice
versa?
If
Hello,
I'm trying to build a set of plpgsql functions in order to ease
partitioning by date, let's say
one table per day for a total of 30 days.
I have plpgsql functions to create the partition tables (having a
date suffix) and to manage
a retention period, however I still need to solve a
thats cool,
thanks.
2007/6/19, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rhys Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is regex searching not functioning (as i expect it to?)
~ expects the pattern on the right, not the left. So it's taking your
array entries as patterns, which don't match the data 'Trans'.
Would it help at all to run a ktrace?
Or are the logs I have supplied enough?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Jun 20, 5:55 am, David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, psql is complaining:
ERROR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
Try:
... RETURNS SETOF RECORD ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through
On 6/20/07, Robin Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
`-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead.
Ok solved. This is what the configure-script barfs on. Hacking the
spec-file to change this flag removes this problem.
--
regards,
Robin
OK so which is the correct way to do it?
E.g., Say I have a table with users, and a table with clubs, and a table
that links them. Each user can be in more than one club and each club
has more than one member. Standard M:M relationship. Which link table is
the right way to do it?
This:
CREATE
Bob Pawley napisał(a):
Thanks
Does one version of ODBC work for all versions of Excel and Postgresql.
I am wanting to transfer one or two tables from Excel and manipulate the
information in Postgresql then transfer the results back to Excel as a
single table.
I am using Excel 2000 and
Naz Gassiep wrote:
OK so which is the correct way to do it?
E.g., Say I have a table with users, and a table with clubs, and a table
that links them. Each user can be in more than one club and each club
has more than one member. Standard M:M relationship. Which link table is
the right way to do
Magnus , folks
The only caveat i found in winxp64 is with psqlODBC
my application dont work very well on it into xp64
platform, the work around was change odbc profile in
favor of dns file , with dns file my application
return to work, ok.
BTW i using linux server without problems, but my
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, brian wrote:
The former uses a primary key across both columns to enforce a unique
constraint. In the latter, you have a seperate ID column, which does not
enforce that constraint. And you have to ask yourself if you'll ever be
referencing that ID column for anything at
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
Also, the reason for a third, M-M, table is to relate multiple players and
multiple clubs. If you think of the logic involved, your third table has
only one row for each player-club combination. Therefore, each row is unique
by
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
Also, the reason for a third, M-M, table is to relate multiple players and
multiple clubs. If you think of the logic involved, your third table has
only one row for each player-club combination.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
While true in this simple case, it can quickly become more complicated if
your relationship starts gaining attributes. For example, if you add start
and stop dates, so the (player,club) combination is not unique anymore. If
you track invoices,
--- Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The value of a surrogate key is easy retrieval and really has nothing to
do with normalization or proper modeling.
I often add a surrogate key, even when one is not required just so I
don't have to worry about have a 4 element where clause.
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
--- Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The value of a surrogate key is easy retrieval and really has nothing to
do with normalization or proper modeling.
I often add a surrogate key, even when one is not required just so I
don't have to worry about have a 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(First of all sorry for cross-posting but I feel this is a matter that
interests all recipients)
Thread on pgadmin support:
http://www.pgadmin.org/archives/pgadmin-support/2007-06/msg00046.php
Hello Dave,
This behavior (trying to show the entire
On Jun 20, 2007, at 11:28 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
I've often wondered about this. Since PostgreSQL allows FOREIGN
KEYS to be referenced from UNIQUE
(non-primary) natural keys, couldn't the schema be designed so
that every table has a surrogate
PRIMARY KEY and
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jun 20, 2007, at 11:28 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
I've often wondered about this. Since PostgreSQL allows FOREIGN KEYS
to be referenced from UNIQUE
(non-primary) natural keys, couldn't the schema be designed so that
every table has a
Hi Guyz,
I need some help in an inheritance issue .
The scenario is as follows :
THE SAMPLE DDL:
CREATE TABLE account_login
(
account_id int4 NOT NULL,
account_login_time timestamptz NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
ip_address varchar(32) NOT NULL,
originating_source varchar(32) NOT NULL
On 6/20/07, Richard Broersma Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The value of a surrogate key is easy retrieval and really has nothing to
do with normalization or proper modeling.
I often add a surrogate key, even when one is not required just so I
Maybe this is a well duh kind of question, or maybe there's no
straightforward way to do it, but is there any way that I could have a
pg function initiate a process on the host system?
Specifically I'd like to script an email to send off on an insert
trigger, but the ability to initiate system
PFC wrote:
The chunk to be allocated is not the same size, so to set the
increment value will not help.
I'm sometimes not that subtle, so I'd just use a BIGINT sequence.
Think about the largest chunk you'll ever get (probably less than 2^30
rows, yes ?), set this sequence increment to
Sean Murphy wrote:
Maybe this is a well duh kind of question, or maybe there's no
straightforward way to do it, but is there any way that I could have a
pg function initiate a process on the host system?
Yeah you can use any of the untrusted pl languages for that.
Specifically I'd like to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be a problem with PHP, or at least my set up.
I'm writing pages in basically the same way. Each page has an include
at the top that gets you a database session. The function, either
pg_connect() or mysql_connect(), is supposed to either create a new
If you can use tcl based pl function, the this might help you here --
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgmail/
--
Shoaib Mir
EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
On 6/20/07, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Murphy wrote:
Maybe this is a well duh kind of question, or maybe there's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, with this new Postgres site, I don't have access to my temp
tables after I've traversed another pg_connect. So PHP is either
creating a new connection, or giving me another session, not the one
which I created my tables in.
You wouldn't expect to be given
On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Maybe this is a well duh kind of question, or maybe there's no
straightforward way to do it, but is there any way that I could have a
pg function initiate a process on the host system?
You can use pl/perlu or any of the other untrusted
Maybe this is a well duh kind of question, or maybe there's no
straightforward way to do it, but is there any way that I could have a
pg function initiate a process on the host system?
Specifically I'd like to script an email to send off on an insert
trigger, but the ability to initiate system
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:55:23PM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
Another approach, and one that can be more robust in the case
of external failures, is to have the trigger put the message it wants
to send into a queue table and have an external process that
monitors the table (via polling or
EBIHARA, Yuichiro wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing a software that supports several RDBMSs including PostgreSQL.
The software needs an ability to handle large objects and now it uses 'bytea'
datatype for binary
data and 'text' for text data.
But for portability, I'd rather use BLOB and CLOB defined
Hi!
I'm working on building a PostgreSQL based data warehouse, and I'm thus very
interested in any experiences and usage of the PostgreSQL bitmap index
patches (which I've found on pgsql-patches).
Anyone using these patchese on production systems?
Anyone know if the patches run on latest stable
Sergei Shelukhin wrote:
This is my first (and, by the love of the God, last) project w/pgsql
and everything but the simplest selects is so slow I want to cry.
This is especially bad with vacuum analyze - it takes several hours
for a database of mere 15 Gb on a fast double-core server w/2Gb of
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:55:23PM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
Another approach, and one that can be more robust in the case
of external failures, is to have the trigger put the message it wants
to send into a queue table and have an external process
Christan Josefsson wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on building a PostgreSQL based data warehouse, and I'm thus
very interested in any experiences and usage of the PostgreSQL bitmap
index patches (which I've found on pgsql-patches).
Anyone using these patchese on production systems?
Anyone know if
On 6/20/07, Christan Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using these patchese on production systems?
If these are the same patches that were made for Bizgres, then they
are bound to be in use in some current production systems of that
version of PostgreSQL.
If there's any PgSQL
Alexander Staubo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/20/07, Christan Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's any PgSQL developer reading this - when can on-disk bitmap
indexes be expected to be included in stable PostgreSQL versions?
It's scheduled for inclusion in 8.3,
Not any more --- we
Alexander Staubo wrote:
On 6/20/07, Christan Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using these patchese on production systems?
If these are the same patches that were made for Bizgres, then they
are bound to be in use in some current production systems of that
version of PostgreSQL.
If
Sergei Shelukhin wrote:
This is just an example isolating the problem.
Actual queries contain more tables and more joins and return
reasonable amount of data.
Performance of big indices however is appalling, with planner always
reverting to seqscan with default settings.
I tried to pre-filter
On 6/20/07, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just so there is no confusion. These WILL NOT be in 8.3:
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus
Apologies. I didn't know they had been put on hold.
Alexander.
---(end of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Murphy) writes:
My present need is for email notification; if there's a pg function or
module that would handle this (I haven't turned up anything in my
searches, but maybe I'm using the wrong search terms in the wrong
places) I'd be OK for now, but I'd rather have the
Hi Scott,
Thank you for your comment.
Is there any plan to support BLOB and CLOB in future releases?
Looking at the spec, and postgresql's implementation, I can't
see much reason you couldn't just use a domain to declare that
a bytea is a blob and varchar is a clob.
That sounds a
49 matches
Mail list logo
