On Mon, June 2, 2008 6:53 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think your problem has anything to do with dblink per se.
The repeated begin/exception blocks are apparently managing to leak
some memory per iteration. I can't tell whether this represents
a known (and perhaps already fixed) bug; it very
Henry - Zen Search SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One other thing: the docs mention that functions use cursors
automatically to prevent OOM errors on large selects (as in my case).
Well, the second part of my function does this:
FOR rec in SELECT * FROM bigtable
LOOP
I have recently had to teach myself how to use git and the thought came to me
that this tool might provide a fairly low setup cost way of passing pg_dumps
over the network to our off site data store. Think Rsync, but on a file
content basis; just the content diff gets transmitted.
GiT works by
James B. Byrne wrote:
GiT works by compressing deltas of the contents of successive versions of file
systems under repository control. It treats binary objects as just another
object under control. The question is, are successive (compressed) dumps of
an altered database sufficiently
I was browsing the postgresql download site, but I wasn't able to find
the source RPM for 8.3.3. Is it available on the site?
Thanks,
Kevin
Windows 2000 Prof. Used upgrade option, not full install.
I upgraded my 8.3.1 to 8.3.3. Looks like all went ok except I had no
psql.exe in my bin dir.
I searched for it found it in
C:\WINNT\Installer\{B823632F-3B72-4514-8861-B961CE263224} dir.
It is the 8.3.3 version. When I copied it to
On Fri, June 13, 2008 7:05 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
How soon is bang?
I'll run it again and post back.
The memory overhead per subtransaction is
not zero, though I think it's fairly small if you don't have any
triggers pending as a result of the insert.
Two triggers are fired for each insert
James B. Byrne wrote:
I have recently had to teach myself how to use git and the thought came to me
that this tool might provide a fairly low setup cost way of passing pg_dumps
over the network to our off site data store. Think Rsync, but on a file
content basis; just the content diff gets
James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently had to teach myself how to use git and the thought came to me
that this tool might provide a fairly low setup cost way of passing pg_dumps
over the network to our off site data store. Think Rsync, but on a file
content basis; just the
Henry - Zen Search SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, June 13, 2008 7:05 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
The memory overhead per subtransaction is
not zero, though I think it's fairly small if you don't have any
triggers pending as a result of the insert.
Two triggers are fired for each insert (before
Tom Lane wrote:
James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GiT works by compressing deltas of the contents of successive versions of
file
systems under repository control. It treats binary objects as just another
object under control. The question is, are successive (compressed) dumps
I have found in most instances if you leave the services window open
the installer will fail to install (or upgrade) the postgres service.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
@craig
i am on mac os x 10.5 and i installed via macports using robby russel
pg install guide.
here is the initdb...
Init your new PostgreSQL database with: initdb -D pgdata
Start up PostgreSQL with: pg_ctl -D pgdata -l pgdata/psql.log start
Create a new database with: createdb
Hi. I'm trying to automate the updating of a database. This entails
creating the new database from scratch (which takes a long time), under a
different name, say mydb_tmp, and once this new database is ready, doing a
hot swap, i.e. renaming the existing database to something like
mydb_20080613
I never did get an answer to this.
I get:
ERROR: cannot change return type of existing function
HINT: Use DROP FUNCTION first.
** Error **
ERROR: cannot change return type of existing function
SQL state: 42P13
Hint: Use DROP FUNCTION first.
When I try to:
CREATE OR
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 06:11:43PM -0700, Ralph Smith wrote:
I get:
ERROR: cannot change return type of existing function
HINT: Use DROP FUNCTION first.
Don't use CREATE OR REPLACE for the second one. The OR REPLACE is
trying to replace a function of the same name.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
16 matches
Mail list logo
