On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:47 AM, m zyzy myz...@gmail.com wrote:
I had this weird problem in CentOS 5 and Fedora 10 . the one-click binary
installer failed
execute this
./postgresql-8.3.5-1-linux.bin
shows
Segmentation fault
I don't know what's causing it, I use the PGDG RHEL 5 packages
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:47 AM, m zyzy myz...@gmail.com wrote:
I had this weird problem in CentOS 5 and Fedora 10 . the one-click binary
installer failed
execute this
./postgresql-8.3.5-1-linux.bin
shows
Segmentation fault
Do either of the suggestions at
Thank you Scott and Dave.
Dave , the url given , not really helpful unless I go through each and every
details,I dont know -searcg the page for the word segmentation returns
nothing . another thing ,just to let you know my postGIS installation
through StackBuilder still failed by returning error
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:27 AM, m zyzy myz...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott , my latest attempt to install in centos 5 this time work well by
re-downloading .bin installer . But , in fc10 the
./postgresql-8.3.5-1-linux.bin command still to no avail.
for now , the text mode ,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:27 AM, m zyzy myz...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Scott and Dave.
Dave , the url given , not really helpful unless I go through each and every
details,
The text at the link I gave reads:
The installer crashes on Linux. What can I do?
BitRock InstallBuilder has
Justin Pasher wrote:
Hello,
I have a server running PostgreSQL 8.1.15-0etch1 (Debian etch) that was
recently put into production. Last week a developer started having a problem
with his psql connection being terminated every couple of minutes when he
was running a query. When I look through
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 1/13/09, Christian Schröder c...@deriva.de wrote:
Hi list,
I have written a function that returns a setof record. The function has a
table name as a parameter and the resulting records have the same structure
as this table. Is there any easy way to specify this when
Hi,
i'm defining a function in plpqsql and would like it to return one varchar
and one row from another table. I have defined it like this (this is only a
test and does not really make sense yet, but it's the principle i'm after):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION verify_record(IN number_to_verify
as far as I know, this bit (statement evaluation) wasn't implemented
then. It only got there in 8.4, so you can have even subselects
evaluated.
So it isn't a bug, it just wasn't implemented to work that way back than,
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
Sorry, I should have RTFM(!!!). I found it under 4.2.4 Field selection.
Apparently it works just as I want, but I should have put parenthesis around
the row-name like this:
select result,(resulting_row).name from verify_record(1234);
name | result
---|
Test | OK
I also discovered
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:36:03PM -0800, mailingli...@net-virtual.com wrote:
CREATE TABLE listings (
trans_id SERIAL,
mode CHAR(1),
listing_id INT,
region_id INT,
category INT
);
SELECT * FROM listings ORDER BY region_id, category, listing_id,
trans_id
[...] what I want to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:56:25PM -0500, Mark Styles wrote:
SELECT COALESCE(mid,0) AS mid, COALESCE(id_group,0) AS id_group
FROM users
WHERE username = 'test'
UNION
SELECT 0, 0
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE username = 'test');
An alternative using outer joins would be:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Christian Schröder c...@deriva.de wrote:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
them.
I need something like:
select * from myfunc('mytable') as x(like mytable)
or
select * from myfunc('mytable') as x(mytable%TYPE)
Is there any solution for PostgreSQL 8.2?
Hi,
first, many thanks to all for the great work, i'm waiting for 8.4.
I have played with the new possibilities:
test=# select typ, ts, rank() over (partition by typ order by ts desc ) from
foo;
typ | ts | rank
-+---+--
1 |
I have a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 server with max_connections = 400. At this
moment, I have 223 open connections, including 64 from a bunch of
webserver processes and about 100 from desktop machines running a
particular application. The rest are from various scheduled processes
and other
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com writes:
I have a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 server with max_connections = 400. At this
moment, I have 223 open connections, including 64 from a bunch of
webserver processes and about 100 from desktop machines running a
particular application. The rest are from
Tom Lane wrote:
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com writes:
I have a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 server with max_connections = 400. At this
moment, I have 223 open connections, including 64 from a bunch of
webserver processes and about 100 from desktop machines running a
particular application.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
I have a PostgreSQL 8.3.5 server with max_connections = 400. At this
moment, I have 223 open connections, including 64 from a bunch of webserver
processes and about 100 from desktop machines running a particular
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
[snip]
I understand why pooling within a process itself is a good thing.
However, say I have two users running the same program on different
desktop machines. At present, those applications connect with the
same username/password that's tied to
On Jan 15, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
As an example, any system catalog update has to be broadcast to all
live backends, and they all have to dutifully search their catalog
caches to flush stale entries. That costs the same whether the
backend is being put to use or has been
Kirk Strauser wrote:
I understand why pooling within a process itself is a good thing.
However, say I have two users running the same program on different
desktop machines. At present, those applications connect with the same
username/password that's tied to the program and not the actual
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pascal Cohen pco...@wimba.com writes:
The fact is that works on Linux and win but under Mac I always get the
ordering with 'default' C locale (I displayed all the lc_* and all are
right set)
Yeah, this has been complained
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
I posted this allready to the ADMIN list but recieved no reply (what is for
sure ok in a
way ;-) ). So I thought I'll give it a try here. Sorry for any inconvenience.
We are trying to understand an issue concerning the md5 password
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:57:13AM -0500, Guy Rouillier wrote:
Connections are pooled on the client end, not on the server end. So,
you'd be able to pool connections on your web server, and should, for
reasons documented by others. However, since Abby and Barb are using
different
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 18:05 +0100, Andreas Wenk wrote:
postgres=# SELECT rolname,rolpassword from pg_authid;
rolname | rolpassword
- ---+-
postgres |
pgadmin | plaintext
odie | md5passsorrrd
The user odie was
Andreas Wenk a.w...@netzmeister-st-pauli.de writes:
In pg_hba.conf we have:
# TYPE DATABASEUSERCIDR-ADDRESS METHOD
# local is for Unix domain socket connections only
local all all ident sameuser
# IPv4 local connections:
host
On Jan 15, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
I don't believe that's true. My understanding of pgpool is that it
will
reuse an existing connection if it's free, or open a new one if
required.
Gah! It just made it worse!
$ ps auxwww | grep pgpool | grep dbuser | wc -l
30
$ ps
I've got two 300GB databases that I'm going to be upgrading from 8.2.4 (32
bit) to 8.3.5 (64 bit).
The systems are running on Solaris 10u5 64bit with lots of disks in a zfs
raid10 and have 32GB ram.
I've read lots of docs and Google, and found a special flavor of
postgresql.conf that helps
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Kister
pgsql-general...@jeremykister.com wrote:
I've got two 300GB databases that I'm going to be upgrading from 8.2.4 (32
bit) to 8.3.5 (64 bit).
The systems are running on Solaris 10u5 64bit with lots of disks in a zfs
raid10 and have 32GB ram.
Hi Joshua
Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 18:05 +0100, Andreas Wenk wrote:
postgres=# SELECT rolname,rolpassword from pg_authid;
rolname | rolpassword
- ---+-
postgres |
pgadmin | plaintext
odie |
Justin Pasher wrote:
Are there any internal Postgres tables I can look at that may shed some
light on this? Any particular maintenance commands that could be run for
repair?
Please obtain a backtrace from the core file. If there's no core file,
please set ulimit -c unlimited in the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:36:03PM -0800, mailingli...@net-virtual.com
wrote:
CREATE TABLE listings (
trans_id SERIAL,
mode CHAR(1),
listing_id INT,
region_id INT,
category INT
);
SELECT * FROM listings ORDER BY region_id, category, listing_id,
trans_id
[...] what I want
Alvaro Herrera schrieb:
Andreas Wenk wrote:
Yes thats correct with the IP address range. Maybe I did not understand
the auth concept yet. I thought, that with METHOD set to md5, a md5
hashed password is required. The password is submitted with the PHP 5
pg_connect function - as plain
*I am attempting to vacuum and reindex my database. It keeps timing
out. See commands and last part of output below. The vacuum or reindex
only takes a short time to complete normally because the database it
less than 50 mb. I have the query timeout set to 2 minutes, but I do
not know if
On 15/01/2009 20:06, Jason Long wrote:
bigbigbI am attempting to vacuum...[snip]
I don't mean to be a pain, but could you please avoid HUGE type sizes
such as the aboveor better still, avoid using HTML altogether in
your emails to this list.
It makes it look as if you are not just shouting,
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 14:06 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I am attempting to vacuum and reindex my database. It keeps timing
out. See commands and last part of output below. The vacuum or
reindex only takes a short time to complete normally because the
database it less than 50 mb. I have the
On Thursday 15 January 2009, Jason Long mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com
wrote:
*I am attempting to vacuum and reindex my database. It keeps timing
out. See commands and last part of output below. The vacuum or reindex
only takes a short time to complete normally because the database it
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 20:13 +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 15/01/2009 20:06, Jason Long wrote:
bigbigbI am attempting to vacuum...[snip]
I don't mean to be a pain, but could you please avoid HUGE type sizes
such as the aboveor better still, avoid using HTML altogether in
your
On 15/01/2009 20:21, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 20:13 +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain, but could you please avoid HUGE type sizes
such as the aboveor better still, avoid using HTML altogether in
your emails to this list.
The answer to this is
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
But if your application is designed to work well with pooling, it
can provide dramatic performance benefits.
I think that's the problem. As I mentioned at one point, a lot of our
applications have connections open for hours at a time and
Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2009, Jason Long mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com
wrote:
*I am attempting to vacuum and reindex my database. It keeps timing
out. See commands and last part of output below. The vacuum or reindex
only takes a short time to complete normally
I don't mean to be a pain either and I mean no disrespect to anyone on
this list in the following comments.
However, this is about the most anal list ever.
I see so many emails on here about people complaining regarding the
proper way to reply or post to the list.
I used larger font to
In response to Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
But if your application is designed to work well with pooling, it
can provide dramatic performance benefits.
I think that's the problem. As I mentioned at one point, a lot of our
and we also oppose to answering on top of message, and citing
everything underneeth.
Why? Because your words should say what you mean, not show it by its
look. Hence, plain ascii is enough for us - and should be for every
intelligent human being.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Jason Long
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 14:32 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain either and I mean no disrespect to anyone on
this list in the following comments.
However, this is about the most anal list ever.
You haven't been to the debian list have you? :).
I see so many emails on here
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
A faster server.
Well the sever is plenty fast. It has 2 quad core 1600MHz FSB 3.0 GHz Xeon
5472 CPUs and a very light workload.
A few things.
That doesn't make a fast server. The disk i/o subsystem makes
On 15/01/2009 20:32, Jason Long wrote:
However, this is about the most anal list ever. I see so many emails on
here about people complaining regarding the proper way to reply or post
to the list.
Well, as someone else has just pointed out, it's all about readability
and making your words easy
On 15/01/2009 20:44, Scott Marlowe wrote:
We're a bunch of fuzzy little kittens
playing with balls of yarn by comparison. :)
Now *there's* an image! :-)
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jason Long wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain either and I mean no disrespect to anyone
on this list in the following comments.
However, this is about the most anal list ever.
I see so many emails on here about people complaining regarding the
proper way to
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
But if your application is designed to work well with pooling, it can
provide dramatic performance benefits.
I think that's the problem. As I mentioned at one point, a lot of our
applications have connections open for
On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
However, it pgpool can't pool connections if each connection has its
own username. Not sure what exactly is causing it not to work for
you,
but that was the first thing that came to mind.
The usernames are per-app. Zope connections with
Steve Atkins wrote:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jason Long wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain either and I mean no disrespect to anyone
on this list in the following comments.
However, this is about the most anal list ever.
I see so many emails on here about people complaining regarding the
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 20:39 +, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
and we also oppose to answering on top of message, and citing
everything underneeth.
Why? Because your words should say what you mean, not show it by its
look. Hence, plain ascii is enough for us - and should be for every
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
Steve Atkins wrote:
I'm sure none of that other than the last actually applies to you, but
those are
the expectations you set by using HTML email and then insulting all
the list members when someone asks
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
But if your application is designed to work well with pooling, it can
provide dramatic performance benefits.
I think that's the problem. As I mentioned at one point, a
On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
If you know that the application does not change GUC variables then
you will probably benefit greatly by using pgbouncer.
Thanks, Steve! That's just the kind of pointer I can use. I've been
using PostgreSQL for years but I've never
On Jan 15, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
Steve Atkins wrote:
I'm sure none of that other than the last actually applies to you,
but
those are
the expectations you set by using HTML email and
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
A faster server.
Well the sever is plenty fast. It has 2 quad core 1600MHz FSB 3.0 GHz Xeon
5472 CPUs and a very light workload.
A few things.
That doesn't make a fast server.
Kirk Strauser wrote:
...
I understand why pooling within a process itself is a good thing.
However, say I have two users running the same program on different
desktop machines. At present, those applications connect with the
same username/password that's tied to the program and not the
Richard Huxton wrote:
Justin Pasher wrote:
Hello,
I have a server running PostgreSQL 8.1.15-0etch1 (Debian etch) that was
recently put into production. Last week a developer started having a problem
with his psql connection being terminated every couple of minutes when he
was running a
In response to Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
However, it pgpool can't pool connections if each connection has its
own username. Not sure what exactly is causing it not to work for
you,
but that was the first thing that came to mind.
Steven Lembark wrote:
I would like to use PSQLFS(http://www.edlsystems.com/psqlfs/)
to store 100 GB of images in PostgreSQL.
Once they are in there I can deal with them. My main purpose is to use
rsync to get the files into the database.
Is there a better way to load 20,000 plus files
Hi Tom,
Tom Lane schrieb:
Andreas Wenk a.w...@netzmeister-st-pauli.de writes:
In pg_hba.conf we have:
# TYPE DATABASEUSERCIDR-ADDRESS METHOD
# local is for Unix domain socket connections only
local all all ident sameuser
#
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Segmentation fault - probably a bug or bad RAM.
It's a relatively new machine, but that's obviously a possibility with
any hardware. I haven't seen any other programs experiencing problems on
the box, but the Postgres
Andreas Wenk wrote:
Yes thats correct with the IP address range. Maybe I did not understand
the auth concept yet. I thought, that with METHOD set to md5, a md5
hashed password is required. The password is submitted with the PHP 5
pg_connect function - as plain text.
It is specified to
Tom Lane wrote:
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Segmentation fault - probably a bug or bad RAM.
It's a relatively new machine, but that's obviously a possibility with
any hardware. I haven't seen any other programs experiencing problems
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
I'll let you know when I get a chance to get a core dump from the
process. I assume I will need a version of Postgres built with debug
symbols for it to be useful? I'm not seeing one in the standard Debian
repositories, so I might have to
Tom Lane wrote:
Having debug symbols would be more useful, but unless the binary is
totally stripped, a backtrace might provide enough info without that.
Try it and see if you get any function names in the trace, or only
numbers.
(BTW, does Debian have anything comparable to Red Hat's debuginfo
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
You got me. I have a set of mirrored raptors. I am not sure the disk i/o
subsystem is a bottleneck.
The whole DB is 50 mb with minimal users.
Then you're only ever writing to the db,
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x0827441d in MemoryContextAlloc ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0827441d in MemoryContextAlloc ()
#1 0x08274467 in MemoryContextStrdup ()
#2 0x0826501c in database_getflatfilename ()
#3
Just wondering if I need to change the defalt values for autovacuum in version
8.3.5?
Regards,
BTJ
--
---
Bjørn T Johansen
b...@havleik.no
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't really see the problem. I assume from your reference to pg_trgm
that you're using trigram similarity as the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Bjørn T Johansen b...@havleik.no wrote:
Just wondering if I need to change the defalt values for autovacuum in
version 8.3.5?
They're fairly good. A good way to see if it's working for you is to
let autovacuum run for a few days with your server handling a
Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm. This isn't very trustworthy for lack of debug symbols (what we're
probably looking at are the nearest global function names before the
actual locations). However, it strongly suggests that something is
broken in the active memory context, and the most likely
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm. This isn't very trustworthy for lack of debug symbols (what we're
probably looking at are the nearest global function names before the
actual locations).
The lack of debug symbols makes this all mere guesses though. The
Tom Lane wrote:
I read it like this:
#0 0x0827441d in MemoryContextAlloc () -- real
#1 0x08274467 in MemoryContextStrdup ()-- real
#2 0x0826501c in database_getflatfilename () -- real
#3 0x0826504e in database_getflatfilename () -- must be write_database_file
#4
I am having a serious problem with my application and I hope someone can
help me out.
This could not happen at a worse time as a consulting firm is at my
clients to recommend a new financial system and the inventory
system(which I developed) keeps locking up.
I have a dynamically built query
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 18:44 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
The query that hangs the system is requesting a count(*)
based on some parameters the users selects.
Can you show an example of the full offending query? How big is the
table?
And maybe 1 in 20 will not complete.
If you really have nothing
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:56:51 -0800
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I know many perfectly intelligent people that are better served
through diagrams, pdf and color than a mailing list. Most of them
make sure geeks like us, *EAT*.
Does that mean they are not intelligent or
I have a dynamically built query that will periodically(2 times a day and
becoming more frequent) make my server totally unresponsive.
does this query involve more than geqo_threshold (default 12) tables?
If so, this most probably is geqo (genetic query optimizer) kicking
in. Try to fiddle
I am setting up Postgres for OpenSSL + FIPs.
I am compiling Postgres with OpenSSL FIPS library using the
-with-openssl option. The question I have is, just doing that
suffice? Or do I have to modify the postgres source code?
Since I read through the OpenSSL FIPS documentation, it mentions to
Hi,
ltree and pg_trgm with UTF8 support are available from CVS HEAD, see
See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-06/msg00356.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-11/msg00139.php
Oleg
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, pepone.onrez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM,
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 19:37 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I have not looked into the detail of the explain, and I do see visually
that very different plans are being chosen.
It would help to share these plans with us...
See EXPLAIN ANALYZE below for three different plans
83 matches
Mail list logo
