Dhaval Shah wrote:
I am setting up Postgres for OpenSSL + FIPs.
I am compiling Postgres with OpenSSL FIPS library using the
-with-openssl option. The question I have is, just doing that
suffice? Or do I have to modify the postgres source code?
Since I read through the OpenSSL FIPS
Anyone know of a decent diff tool for comparing two schemas?
I Had a go with
http://apgdiff.sourceforge.net/
but it appears it doesn't quote it's sql properly. A shame, otherwise it'd be
just what I need.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
dbwrench has this option, afair - called 'reverse synchronize'.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
you can also look at:
http://www.sqlmanager.net/en/products/postgresql/dbcomparer
Not free but it's a nice product, with nice support give it a try.
You can also check at other products from EMS, very nice! Especially the
SQL Manager:
Hello,
are these statements true:
* «You should always index fks. The only exception is when the
matching unique or primary key is never updated or deleted» ?
* «Small tables do not require indexes» ?
* «Create an index if you frequently want to retrieve less than
about ~15%
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:06:47PM +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote:
Hi,
first, many thanks to all for the great work, i'm waiting for 8.4.
I have played with the new possibilities:
test=# select typ, ts, rank() over (partition by typ order by ts desc ) from
foo;
typ | ts
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Now i want only 3 records for every typ:
test=# select typ, ts, rank() over (partition by typ order by ts desc )
from foo where rank = 3;
ERROR: column rank does not exist
LINE 1: ...rtition by typ order by ts desc )
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:23:16PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Now i want only 3 records for every typ:
test=# select typ, ts, rank() over (partition by typ order by ts desc )
from foo where rank = 3;
ERROR:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
I tried this:
SELECT
typ,
ts,
rank() over w AS foo_rank
FROM
foo
WINDOW w AS (partition by typ order by ts desc)
WHERE
foo_rank 4;
ERROR: syntax error at or near WHERE
LINE 8: WHERE
^
RTFM ... WINDOW goes
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:34:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
I tried this:
SELECT
typ,
ts,
rank() over w AS foo_rank
FROM
foo
WINDOW w AS (partition by typ order by ts desc)
WHERE
foo_rank 4;
ERROR: syntax
Hi, this is basically what I would like to improve :
1) A user searches for a product on category and location.
a) The query is run and the result (limit 30) are returned and shown.
b) The same query is ran again but now I return the count on how many
matches there was totally. (This has to be
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
We don't appear to be able to use the actual thing in the target list
either.
Would you translate that into English? Or at least an example without
trivial syntax errors?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Hi chaps,
I've got a question about inheritance here, and I think I may have gotten the
wrong end of the stick as to how it works, or at least when to use it.
What I intended to do was have a schema audit with an empty set of tables in
it, then each quarter restore our audit data into schemas
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:41:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
We don't appear to be able to use the actual thing in the target list
either.
Would you translate that into English? Or at least an example without
trivial syntax errors?
This works:
SELECT
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Basically, there is no way I've found so far to qualify any window
function in the target list, which makes a giant POLA violation.
The FM points out in at least two places that window functions logically
execute on the output of the WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:43 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
The numbers in the table names are due to hibernate generating the
query.
Well, that's what auto-generated schemas and queries do, I guess.
Now we are getting somewhere.
Someone suggested tweaking the genetic algorithm parameters.
Has
good idea although tweaks to geqo_pool_size, geqo_generations, and
geqo_selection_bias will affect all queries
For larger and unwieldy queries you might want to look at breaking the queries
down to smaller pieces e.g.
Break each statement to 2 tables with 1 join (preferrably inner join with
Jeff Davis wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:43 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
The numbers in the table names are due to hibernate generating the
query.
Well, that's what auto-generated schemas and queries do, I guess.
The schema is not auto generated. It evolved as I created my
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:35 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
The schema is not auto generated. It evolved as I created my
inventory system.
It is relatively easy for humans to understand. Or at least for me
since I wrote it.
On second look, there aren't that many tables. There are just a lot of
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 13:37 -0500, Martin Gainty wrote:
good idea although tweaks to geqo_pool_size, geqo_generations, and
geqo_selection_bias will affect all queries
Only queries that invoke GEQO.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 19:37 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I have not looked into the detail of the explain, and I do see visually
that very different plans are being chosen.
It would help to share these plans with
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Lavoie bruno.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
are these statements true:
«You should always index fks. The only exception is when the matching unique
or primary key is never updated or deleted» ?
No. If the table that fks to another table has 10 rows
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Lavoie bruno.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
are these statements true:
Got interrupted by a coworker... The other two questions:
«Create an index if you frequently want to retrieve less than about ~15% of
the rows in a large table»
PostgreSQL tends
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
The order doesn't matter. Analyze doesn't know anything about the
indexes, it knows about the fields / tables. I.e. if you run analyze,
then create the index, you get the same basic result as if you create
the index then run analyze.
There is an
Weird. I wonder if the attachment is too big and the mailing list
server is chopping it off of the email.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu,
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Weird. I wonder if the attachment is too big and the mailing list
server is chopping it off of the email.
I just tried it by sending text only instead of text and html. We will
see if it goes through this time.
Other than that do you see anything weird about my email?
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 19:37 -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I have not looked into the detail of the explain, and I do see visually
that very different plans are being chosen.
It would help
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
I just tried it by sending text only instead of text and html. We will see
if it goes through this time.
Other than that do you see anything weird about my email?
Still nothing. Do you have webspace you
You're not going to get anywhere using Postgres for this kind of task.
Especially if you have millions of products like we do in our database.
We switched to using Solr for our search indexing and querying. It's
way faster than Postgres for obtaining counts like you need. We still
fetch
Tom Lane wrote:
I read it like this:
#0 0x0827441d in MemoryContextAlloc () -- real
#1 0x08274467 in MemoryContextStrdup ()-- real
#2 0x0826501c in database_getflatfilename () -- real
#3 0x0826504e in database_getflatfilename () -- must be write_database_file
#4
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to set up a warm standby server, but have problems with running
it on the backup. I feel that I have done like the documentation says:
The WAL is being copied to the slave using rsync.
Doing SELECT pg_start_backup(); (in psql)
Copying the data directory to the
David Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Jason Long
mailing.l...@supernovasoftware.com wrote:
I just tried it by sending text only instead of text and html. We will see
if it goes through this time.
Other than that do you see anything weird about my email?
Still nothing.
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
I recompiled from the Debian source package and added --enable-cassert
(--enable-debug was already there). I replaced the Debian standard
packages with the recompiled versions and started up the cluster. Now it
is hitting a failure on one of
Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk writes:
So far I don't get any errors, but when I start postgres on the slave (I'm
using pg_ctl), I get the error 'FATAL: incorrect checksum in control file'.
Both servers are running PostgreSQL-8.3.5, configured with exactly the
same options (just prefix
Tom Lane wrote:
Justin Pasher just...@newmediagateway.com writes:
I recompiled from the Debian source package and added --enable-cassert
(--enable-debug was already there). I replaced the Debian standard
packages with the recompiled versions and started up the cluster. Now it
is hitting a
Justin Pasher wrote:
Dang it. I wonder why the --enable-debug option doesn't seem to actually
be enabling debug. :( For reference, here is the configure command that
the package uses according to the config.log (in case you spot anything
wrong).
Maybe the executable is getting
Tom Lane wrote:
#1 0xb7c37811 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7c38fb9 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0x0828cdf3 in ExceptionalCondition ()
#4 0x082a8cd2 in MemoryContextAlloc ()
#5 0x082a8d67 in MemoryContextStrdup ()
#6 0x0829749c in
I wrote:
... and you've seemingly not managed to install the debug symbols where
gdb can find them.
But never mind that --- it turns out to be trivial to reproduce the
crash. Just create a database, set its datfrozenxid and datvacuumxid
far in the past (via a manual update of pg_database),
On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Glyn Astill wrote:
Hi chaps,
I've got a question about inheritance here, and I think I may have
gotten the wrong end of the stick as to how it works, or at least
when to use it.
What I intended to do was have a schema audit with an empty set of
tables in
Hello,
seems like the usenet gateway is down again (my last successful
contact to news.postgresql.org dates back 10 days).
Is this a known problem?
Rainer
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Hi,
I'm looking for a trigger (any language) that can clone the inserted
row and insert it in another postgres server elsewhere. Is this
possible? Practical? Thoughts?
I know there are some replication systems out there, but I'm hoping a
simple trigger will suffice since I only need to clone
You are perfectly right, master is 32bit and slave is 64bit. I didn't even
consider that that would matter when just copying the data. First I was using
different versions on the two boxes, but ended up installing 8.3.5 on both of
them.
How do I install a 32bit PostgreSql on my 64bit
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk wrote:
You are perfectly right, master is 32bit and slave is 64bit. I didn't even
consider that that would matter when just copying the data. First I was
using different versions on the two boxes, but ended up installing 8.3.5 on
That is almost too simple ;-)
Thanks for the suggestion,
Leif
- Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk
wrote:
You are perfectly right, master is 32bit and slave is 64bit. I
didn't even consider that that
Tom Lane wrote:
What is happening is that autovacuum_do_vac_analyze contains
old_cxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(AutovacMemCxt);
...
vacuum(vacstmt, relids);
...
MemoryContextSwitchTo(old_cxt);
and at the time it is called by process_whole_db,
Does postgresql have a system table that has the table structure of
user tables, like systables and sysobjects in MS SQL Server?
--
Vincent
I'm using python and can execute standard select,update,delete,functions.
What I'd like to do is execute a sql script (a text file). But I don't know
how?
Some thing like:
import psycopg2
import psycopg2.extensions
conn = psycopg2.connect(host=%s dbname=%s user =%s password
=%s
Hi,
Can anyone comment on the practicality of using the code for array_agg
from the dev repos, file src/backend/utils/adt/array_userfuncs.c in 8.3 as
a user defined function? It looks like this code was recently added, Nov
13th/14th. There are two functions, array_agg_transfn and
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Vincent Predoehl
vpredo...@phoenixwebgroup.com wrote:
Does postgresql have a system table that has the table structure of user
tables, like systables and sysobjects in MS SQL Server?
There's the pg_* views and tables that have all of that, and to see
how they
49 matches
Mail list logo
