On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Tomkinson jor...@moodle.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com wrote:
Right, the useful thing to do in this case is to take a look at how big
all the relations (tables, indexes) involved are at each of the steps
Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Akinde michael.aki...@met.no writes:
Anyway - the situation now is that just the loading process is hanging
on the server, with an IDLE in transaction. But it is definitely the
loading program that is hanging, not the Postgres server.
What the stack traces
thanks for replies.
Craig Ringer wrote:
This is a really, really, REALLY bad idea.
I agree.
John R Pierce wrote:
if you mean client side Javascript running on the end users web browser,
no, it should NOT be allowed to connect to a database server directly.
Web pages have username and password
Kevin Duffy wrote:
I need guidance on how move some changes that I have made to
my production database.
On my development database I made changes to a table called
DEPT. I added a column, added
a couple of records and did some general data cleanup
What I did not do was change
Hi all,
Is there any preferably open source tool to convert Oracle Functions to
PostgreSQL Functions.
Thanks,
Abdul Rehman.
In response to Abdul Rahman :
Hi all,
Is there any preferably open source tool to convert Oracle Functions to
PostgreSQL Functions.
Maybe orafce, see http://pgfoundry.org/projects/orafce/
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: - Header)
Abdul Rahman wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any preferably open source tool to convert Oracle
Functions to PostgreSQL Functions.
No, not that I know of. I assume you mean user-created functions.
There is orafce for adding Oracle functions to Postgres.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
Hello,
I've just read about WAL and tried to set these 2 commands
for my test database (which is doing nothing 99% of time):
archive_command = 'cp -v %p /var/lib/pgsql/data/archive/%f'
archive_timeout = 300 # force a logfile segment switch after this
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
I've just read about WAL and tried to set these 2 commands
for my test database (which is doing nothing 99% of time):
archive_command = 'cp -v %p /var/lib/pgsql/data/archive/%f'
archive_timeout = 300 # force a logfile segment switch after this
Michael Akinde michael.aki...@met.no writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
In the past we've seen this type of thing caused by multithreaded
client programs in which more than one thread tried to use the same
PGconn object without adequate interlocking.
Our application is single-threaded, so it seems
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com [090201 00:00]:
Shouldn't someone have ranted about RAID-5 by this point in the thread?
What? Sorry, I wasn't paying attention...
You mean someone's actually still using RAID-5?
;-)
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a
Hi all,
I am planning to use the Bit String data type for a large number of binary
strings, e.g.
CREATE TABLE myTable (myBitStringCol BIT(3));
I will need to perform (bitwise AND) operations using SELECT on this column,
e.g.
SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE myBitStringCol B'101' =
you're going to have alot of work as ANNOTATIONS and DATATYPES are different
e.g.
--- Postgres function which calcs geo_distance
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION geo_distance (point, point)
RETURNS float8
LANGUAGE 'C' IMMUTABLE STRICT AS '$libdir/earthdistance';
--Oracle has no clue what
George Oakman oakm...@hotmail.com writes:
Is it all I need to do? Will PgSQL know how to index properly a Bit String
column? Should I build the index using a special method, e.g.
CREATE INDEX myBitStringCol_idx ON myTable USING gist(myBitStringCol);
No, the default will be to build a
Gregory Stark st...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Note that something like WHERE myBitStringCol B'101' might be selecting
too much of your table to make an index useful anyways. If each bit is set in
half the table then you're talking about selecting 3/4 of the table in which
case a full table
Hi,
Thanks for the info. I new it would have been too easy! :)
Sorry, I made a mistake earlier, my queries will actually be more like
SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE myBitStringCol B'101' = B'101';
This doesn't make much difference for the indexing problem, but it may help
address
Hi all,
We're looking at setting up a warm-standby server using log shipping and
aren't too sure about how we should trigger failover. Is there a
commonly-used approach which is reliable enough to recommend? Looking at
the documentation, there doesn't seem to be any recommendation. I
野村 wrote:
Web pages have username and password with basic, digest or ldap
authorization. So if I createuser with same user and password, and if
there is md5 or something to encode password, I wonder javascript
connects to postgres securely.
for that to work, irregardless of security
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:55 +, Thom Brown wrote:
We're looking at setting up a warm-standby server using log shipping
and aren't too sure about how we should trigger failover. Is there a
commonly-used approach which is reliable enough to recommend? Looking
at the documentation, there
Hi,
I am new to Postgres and am trying to write a query like the one below
(without any luck)
SELECT col_speed, col_time, (col_speed / col_time) AS distance
FROM speed_ratings
HAVING distance ?
ORDER BY distance
In other words, I want to filter on a calculated column. But I get an
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Sharma, Sid
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:47 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Query question
Hi,
I am new to Postgres and am
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
is it looking like the simple replication will make it into 8.4?
You mean the built-in synchronous replication feature? If so, no.
It was decided that synch-rep will be postponed to 8.5.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Hi !
I'm trying to modify an input parameter of a function, but I receive following
error :
ERROR: $17 is declared CONSTANT
CONTEXT: compile of PL/pgSQL function update_jobreg near line 26
Is there a way to modify an input parameter or I have to declare a local
variable and assign that
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:21:16PM -0800, Mike Ivanov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk wrote:
Depending on where these are on disk and how fast your disks are this
could take up to 30 seconds.
This does not sound very inspiring :-)
It was calculated
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com [090201 00:00]:
Shouldn't someone have ranted about RAID-5 by this point in the thread?
What? Sorry, I wasn't paying attention...
You mean someone's actually still using RAID-5?
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:21 +0900, Jordan Tomkinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca
wrote:
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com [090201 00:00]:
Shouldn't someone have ranted about RAID-5 by this point in
the thread?
--- On Wed, 2/25/09, Jordan Tomkinson jor...@moodle.com wrote:
...
What exactly is wrong with RAID5 and what should we have
gone with?
RAID10 is often used. As others have pointed out, it is very slow for random
writes. It also has issues that expose your data to total loss, see for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.comwrote:
RAID5 outside of RAID 0 is the worst possible RAID level to run with a
database. (of the commonly used raid level's that is).
It is very, very slow on random writes which is what databases do.
Switch to RAID 10.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Jordan Tomkinson jor...@moodle.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com [090201 00:00]:
Shouldn't someone have ranted about RAID-5 by this point in the thread?
What? Sorry, I
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Nico Callewaert wrote:
I'm trying to modify an input parameter of a function, but I receive
following error :
ERROR: $17 is declared CONSTANT
CONTEXT: compile of PL/pgSQL function update_jobreg near line 26
Is there a way to modify an input parameter or I
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:44 +0900, Jordan Tomkinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Joshua D. Drake
j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
RAID5 outside of RAID 0 is the worst possible RAID level to
run with a
database. (of the commonly used raid
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Jordan Tomkinson jor...@moodle.com wrote:
taken before the ~7000 rows were entered.
relation| size
---+
public.mdl_log| 595 MB
public.mdl_forum_posts| 375 MB
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:21 +0900, Jordan Tomkinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca
wrote:
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com [090201 00:00]:
Shouldn't someone have ranted about RAID-5 by this point in
- Original Message -
From: John DeSoi de...@pgedit.com
To: Nico Callewaert callewaert.n...@telenet.be
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Function parameter
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Nico Callewaert wrote:
I'm trying
34 matches
Mail list logo
