Hi All,
I want to migrate from PostgreSQL to Oracle and need any tool preferably
open source. And I am specially concerned with stored procedures /
functions.
Regards,
Abdul Rehman.
You were just converting from Oracle to Postgres two days ago, so it
shouldn't take much to convert back.
Josh Trutwin wrote:
I found the following on a blog post
(http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/08/avoiding-empty-updates/)
which had a rule to prevent empty updates:
CREATE RULE no_unchanging_updates AS
ON UPDATE
TO test_table
WHERE ROW(OLD.*) IS NOT DISTINCT FROM ROW(NEW.*)
DO
2009/2/27 Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com
wrote:
First of all, I wonder why the same query divided up in half - and
using temporary table works as expected, and with everything together
I'm betting it's your use
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/27 Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com
wrote:
First of all, I wonder why the same query divided up in half - and
using temporary
2009/2/27 Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
Nope.
as far as I can understand it, if I do the same thing in two steps,
and in one step. And the latter is broken, because of some internal
process/optimization/whatever - that's a bug to me.
Unless I am expecting it to work, and it was just
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/27 Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
Nope.
as far as I can understand it, if I do the same thing in two steps,
and in one step. And the latter is broken, because of some internal
Hello,
i have a query that returns a result set like this:
item | size | stock
123 | XL | 10
123 | XXL | 5
123 | XS | 3
and i would like get the results like this:
item | XL | XXL | XS
123 | 10 | 5 | 3
i have been thinking how to do it with a plpgsql function but the
Linos, 27.02.2009 11:41:
Hello,
i have a query that returns a result set like this:
item | size | stock
123 | XL | 10
123 | XXL | 5
123 | XS | 3
and i would like get the results like this:
item | XL | XXL | XS
123 | 10 | 5 | 3
i have been thinking how to do it with a plpgsql
Thomas Kellerer escribió:
Linos, 27.02.2009 11:41:
Hello,
i have a query that returns a result set like this:
item | size | stock
123 | XL | 10
123 | XXL | 5
123 | XS | 3
and i would like get the results like this:
item | XL | XXL | XS
123 | 10 | 5 | 3
i have been thinking
In response to Linos :
Hello,
i have a query that returns a result set like this:
item | size | stock
123 | XL | 10
123 | XXL | 5
123 | XS | 3
and i would like get the results like this:
item | XL | XXL | XS
123 | 10 | 5 | 3
Other solution with plain SQL:
A. Kretschmer escribió:
In response to Linos :
Hello,
i have a query that returns a result set like this:
item | size | stock
123 | XL | 10
123 | XXL | 5
123 | XS | 3
and i would like get the results like this:
item | XL | XXL | XS
123 | 10 | 5 | 3
Other solution with
Alban Hertroys dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl writes:
On Feb 26, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
looks like you completely misunderstood my question.
I'm not surprised. What do you expect with random capitalisation, random
table
alias names and random indentation
Hi all
I remember, a while ago somebody mentioning an odbc driver for postgres
that is not dependant on a working postgres client installation.
Unfortunately I lost the link to it, can anybody remember?
(
I tested it then and it worked fine for simple task, but then switched
back to the
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Gregory Stark st...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Uh, we get a lot of really mangled SQL and explain plans -- I don't see
anything wrong with these. If the question was unclear it sounds like it's
just because it's a fairly subtle problem and was hard to describe.
Hello i have the same table with the same data in my development machine and in
a small server in production. The table is this:
Tabla «modelo_subfamilia»
Columna| Tipo | Modificadores
---+---+---
nombre| character
Linos wrote:
2009-02-27 13:51:15 CET 127.0.0.1LOG: duración: 4231.045 ms sentencia:
SELECT nombre, subfamilia_id, id_familia, hasta, foto,
id_seccion, id_categoria FROM modelo_subfamilia
PSQL with \timing:
-development: Time: 72,441 ms
-server: Time: 78,762 ms
but if i load it from QT
Richard Huxton escribió:
Linos wrote:
2009-02-27 13:51:15 CET 127.0.0.1LOG: duración: 4231.045 ms sentencia:
SELECT nombre, subfamilia_id, id_familia, hasta, foto,
id_seccion, id_categoria FROM modelo_subfamilia
PSQL with \timing:
-development: Time: 72,441 ms
-server: Time: 78,762 ms
1)Strip all Postgres and or user-specific custom datatypes
for ex if you see an in or out var declared as fubar chances are this wont map
correctly in Oracle
2)Get to know packages..they work well to aggregate and organise
2a)Functions and Procedures which are used for a specific purpose for
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:30 +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I remember, a while ago somebody mentioning an odbc driver for postgres
that is not dependant on a working postgres client installation.
Unfortunately I lost the link to it, can anybody remember?
ODBCng?
Hello,
I'm having some troubles with the correct use of the execute plpgsql
statement. Where I work, we have a postgresql db hosting a set of
schemas all with the same tables and, from time to time, we upgrade
the schemas to a new version coding a stored procedure like the
following
Hello,
I have a pgsql database hosting xml data in xml columns. The data,
have !DOCTYPE declarations at the beginning, so it is saved with
XMLPARSE (DOCUMENT text)
when I try to restore a database from dump, pg_restore complains
because the data it tries to restore is not an xml content
Thank you very much for your advice, I guess I'm wasting my time in
this 'problem'. I'm going to check that class, it seems pretty useful.
And by the way...yes, this is a born-dead app (at least on the client
side) and it's likely to be ported to .NET in the future, but like I
said before, it's
Hi, check this out:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-05/msg00938.php
I would say that execute is the only way to achieve some things
related to schemas and temp tables.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Is there a way in psql to hide the row counts but keep the column headers?
The man page talks about \t and --tuples-only, but both of those also
suppress column headers.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:30 +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I remember, a while ago somebody mentioning an odbc driver for postgres
that is not dependant on a working postgres client installation.
Unfortunately I lost the link to it, can anybody remember?
ODBCng?
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 19:06 +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:30 +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I remember, a while ago somebody mentioning an odbc driver for postgres
that is not dependant on a working postgres client installation.
Maxim Boguk mbo...@masterhost.ru writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Could you send me a dump of this test_table off-list? It seems like
there must be something strange about the stats of last_change_time,
but I don't feel like guessing about what it is ...
Here attached is small part of table (1160
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Enrico Sirola enrico.sir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some troubles with the correct use of the execute plpgsql
statement. Where I work, we have a postgresql db hosting a set of schemas
all with the same tables and, from time to time, we upgrade the
Linos wrote:
Richard Huxton escribió:
Linos wrote:
2009-02-27 13:51:15 CET 127.0.0.1LOG: duración: 4231.045 ms sentencia:
SELECT nombre, subfamilia_id, id_familia, hasta, foto,
id_seccion, id_categoria FROM modelo_subfamilia
PSQL with \timing:
-development: Time: 72,441 ms
-server:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:34:08 +
Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
CREATE TRIGGER prevent_empty_updates BEFORE UPDATE ON test FOR
EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE prevent_empty_updates();
Actually after writing this, this TOO does not seem to work after
an ADD COLUMN. :/ Any
Richard Huxton escribió:
Linos wrote:
Richard Huxton escribió:
Linos wrote:
2009-02-27 13:51:15 CET 127.0.0.1LOG: duración: 4231.045 ms sentencia:
SELECT nombre, subfamilia_id, id_familia, hasta, foto,
id_seccion, id_categoria FROM modelo_subfamilia
PSQL with \timing:
-development: Time:
I just did a Vacuum Analyze on a DB. It worked OK, but I got...
NOTICE: max_fsm_relations(1000) equals the number of relations checked
HINT: You have at least 1000 relations. Consider increasing the configuration
parameter max_fsm_relations
I browsed around and learned that this has to do
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:37 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
I just did a Vacuum Analyze on a DB. It worked OK, but I got...
NOTICE: max_fsm_relations(1000) equals the number of relations checked
HINT: You have at least 1000 relations. Consider increasing the
configuration
In response to Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com:
I just did a Vacuum Analyze on a DB. It worked OK, but I got...
NOTICE: max_fsm_relations(1000) equals the number of relations checked
HINT: You have at least 1000 relations. Consider increasing the
configuration parameter
There is no way I have 1000 tables/indexes. But maybe it's counting
table/index file extensions in the mix? What's the metadata query to see these
1000 relations?
-dave
-Original Message-
From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmo...@potentialtech.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:03 PM
To:
In response to Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com:
There is no way I have 1000 tables/indexes. But maybe it's counting
table/index file extensions in the mix? What's the metadata query to see
these 1000 relations?
Are you counting tables, indexes, sequences, pg_toast tables, system
Ya, most of it's system stuff. OK, I see where the 1000 comes from. I bumped
it up to 1200 in postgresql.conf. Is there a way I can spin that in without
rebooting the DB (and kicking my user off)?
-dave
-Original Message-
From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmo...@potentialtech.com]
Sent:
In response to Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com:
Ya, most of it's system stuff. OK, I see where the 1000 comes from. I
bumped it up to 1200 in postgresql.conf. Is there a way I can spin that in
without rebooting the DB (and kicking my user off)?
No. Unless something has changed
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
Is there a way I can spin that in without rebooting the DB (and kicking
my user off)?
Nope:
# select name,context from pg_settings where name='max_fsm_pages';
name | context
---+
max_fsm_pages | postmaster
That's
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com writes:
In response to Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com:
There is no way I have 1000 tables/indexes. But maybe it's counting
table/index file extensions in the mix? What's the metadata query to see
these 1000 relations?
Are you counting tables,
For the time being, I dropped a few tables in a scratch DB that I was
experimenting with. I just reran the app that gave me the messages before and
this time no messages. Tonight, I'll cycle the DB with the new fsm value.
Thanks for all the help!
(BTW, just have to say that the help I get
41 matches
Mail list logo
