On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT), kabindra kabin...@ttwin.com
wrote:
Hello
I am using pgplus 8.3 in linux(centos) and trying to backup the
database
from windows machine using pgadmin 1.8.4 but i get an error while backing
up. It says version mismatched and use -i option if I want to
I think this is a bug in the version.
If linux and windows pg_dump are not the same and what can be I do to backup
the database.
Thanks
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT), kabindra kabin...@ttwin.com
wrote:
Hello
I am using pgplus 8.3 in linux(centos) and
Hello Gustavo !
Gente, buenos dias.
Como consulto lo triggers desde psql?
Unfortunately I don't know Spanish. As far as I understand your
question was about triggers in postgresql. Trigger is the function
calls automatically on operations insert-delete-update.
--
Best regards,
Sincerely
I think this is a bug in the version.
If linux and windows pg_dump are not the same and what can be I do to backup
the database.
Hi,
In next version(1.10), pgAdmin add a new option to ignore version mismatch
check.
Beta2 is here:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/pgadmin3/release/v1.10.0-beta2/
Life sure would be easier if that were the case Michal, but no... that
is not the case here. The sum is not a simple sum, it is a sum of all
elements having a lower or equal A and the same C. This is a
cumulative sum as pointed out by others.
2009/4/15 Michal Politowski mpol...@meep.pl:
On Wed,
Oh... and also, A, B, C are in the same table.
2009/4/17 Shug Boabby shug.boa...@gmail.com:
Life sure would be easier if that were the case Michal, but no... that
is not the case here. The sum is not a simple sum, it is a sum of all
elements having a lower or equal A and the same C. This is a
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've applied a patch for this. It will be in 8.3.8, or if you're
in a hurry you can grab it from our CVS server or here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090416204228.57931754...@cvs.postgresql.org
just out of
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com wrote:
just out of curiosity - when was it introduced, ie - which version was
the first affected ? We're still on 8.3.5 here.
(I had no idea release-notes have date), it got in by 8.3.4 (changed
right after 8.3.3 was
Thank you Tom. The cron job for vacuum+analyze was not installed on the host.
(I had this idea some seconds after posting)
After vacuum+analyze the performance is good. I am happy.
Nevertheless, on a different host with nearly the same data, a index scan is
used.
foo_hostone_foo=# explain
Is there any kind of a parallel psql client, to control a cluster of
databases, without the need to write a plproxy function for each request?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
What are folks doing to protect sensitive data in their databases?
We're running on the assumption that the _really_ sensitive data
is too sensitive for us to just trust the front-end programs that
connect to it.
The decision coming down from on-high is that we need to encrypt
certain
Michal... I must apologise, your suggestion worked a treat!!!
I never realised it was possible to do a join on a table to itself before!
2009/4/15 Michal Politowski mpol...@meep.pl:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:32:42 +0100, Shug Boabby wrote:
I simplified my problem a little too much and now I'm
In response to chris.el...@shropshire.gov.uk:
What are folks doing to protect sensitive data in their databases?
We're running on the assumption that the _really_ sensitive data
is too sensitive for us to just trust the front-end programs that
connect to it.
The decision coming
Tom Lane wrote:
I've applied a patch for this. It will be in 8.3.8, or if you're
in a hurry you can grab it from our CVS server or here:
Thanks a lot for your effort and the quick response!
Regards,
Christian
--
Deriva GmbH Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
Financial IT
You can get extra (undesirable) results, depending on the name. For
example, if you are searching for the last name of Ricks, you will also
find all authors whose first name is Rick.
I also noticed that the directions for indexing multiple columns don't seem
to be quite right.
In section
so it looks to me, like you are trying to use wrong tool for the job.
Why not just normalize names to #3 ?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 19:21:03 you wrote:
Janning Vygen vy...@kicktipp.de writes:
Now i see that the errors occur _exactly_ every 4000 seconds (1 hour, 6
minutes and 40 seconds). I have no clue as i only have one cronjob at
night concerning postgresql. I have no autovacuum running
Take the performance hit, If people on high want the data encrypted,
then
they have to suffer the performance penalty, however bad.
As reasonable as that sounds, I don't think it's true. We've already
brainstormed a dozen ways to work around the performance issue (creative
hashing,
Greetings,
I need to implement the classical problem of threaded comments in a Postgresql
database. I know that the upcoming 8.4 release includes Common Table
Expressions, so I have to ask: is this feature the mother-of-all-solutions
to the threaded comments problem, or is it still worth
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Cultural Sublimation
cultural_sublimat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Greetings,
I need to implement the classical problem of threaded comments in a Postgresql
database. I know that the upcoming 8.4 release includes Common Table
Expressions, so I have to ask: is this
On Thursday 16 April 2009 6:50:46 pm Irwan Hendra wrote:
Hi
I have table A with pk that is being referenced by 5 other tables as
foreign key
I have put all those tables reference to be ON DELETE CASCADE
However for some reason when I tried to delete one of the row in table A,
out of 5
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:06:13PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
I disagree. We're already addressing the issues of security on the
application level through extensive testing, data validation out the
wazoo (to prevent SQL Injection and other application breaches). All
our servers are in highly
In response to Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:06:13PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
I disagree. We're already addressing the issues of security on the
application level through extensive testing, data validation out the
wazoo (to prevent SQL Injection and other
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:52:30AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk:
For example; you say that you don't trust the application, yet the user
must trust the application as they're entering their secret into it.
How does the user ascertain that the
Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com writes:
In next version(1.10), pgAdmin add a new option to ignore version mismatch
check.
This is a really bad idea, as it opens you up to the possibility of
silently wrong dumps.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Cultural Sublimation cultural_sublimat...@yahoo.com writes:
I need to implement the classical problem of threaded comments in a Postgresql
database. I know that the upcoming 8.4 release includes Common Table
Expressions, so I have to ask: is this feature the mother-of-all-solutions
to the
In response to Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk:
As far as the trust factor, you've blurred the lines a bit. My job
is to ensure that the user doesn't know or care about the lines between
application and database, but trusts the system as a whole. However,
I need to clearly define those
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com writes:
In next version(1.10), pgAdmin add a new option to ignore version mismatch
check.
This is a really bad idea, as it opens you up to the possibility of
silently wrong dumps.
Jeff Cook j...@deserettechnology.com writes:
I'm attempting to remove constraints (primary/foreign keys) ahead of a
massive import. Once the data has been imported, I would like to
regenerate the constraints I removed. This process is recommended in
PostgreSQL's documentation and incidentally
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com writes:
In next version(1.10), pgAdmin add a new option to ignore version mismatch
check.
This is a really bad idea, as it opens you up to the
Bill Moran wrote:
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Eric Soroos wrote:
an index on the encrypted SSN field would do this just fine. if
authorized person needs to find the record with a specific SSN, they
encrypt that SSN and then look up the ciphertext in the database...
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:33:15AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
The goal is not to trust any one part of the system.
As a result, we can protect the data across multiple security failures.
As far as I know this isn't a good way to go about designing secure
systems. You're better off defining a set
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As of 8.4, pg_dump ignores --ignore-version altogether, because of the
way it's been rampantly abused. There was never any intention that that
should be a flag to use routinely; it was meant to get you out of
emergency
We have a script wrapper for psql which reads a configuration file and
constructs a psql command to connect to the configured instance of postgres.
We would like to include a search_path setting in the configuraration file
and have the wrapper use that to set the search_path for the psql session.
Hi Thank you both for your responses and apologies for the late reply!
Tom you were correct! :) I split the If statements into 2 for the old and
new tests and it all worked! :)
Thanks once again for all your help! :)
t.
Tom Lane-2 wrote:
sub_woofer tqzeli...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
IF
I have found the correct combinations to solve this problem.
Let me brief what I have done,and the way is simple.
1.download latest middlegen from CVS
(:pserver:anonym...@middlegen.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/middlegen)
2.build the source with ant,then I have middlegen2.2-dev bundles jar
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Mary Sipple msip...@iii.com wrote:
We have a script wrapper for psql which reads a configuration file and
constructs a psql command to connect to the configured instance of postgres.
We would like to include a search_path setting in the configuraration file
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Mary Sipple msip...@iii.com wrote:
We have a script wrapper for psql which reads a configuration file and
constructs a psql command to connect to the configured instance of postgres.
We would like to include a search_path setting in the configuraration file
Mary Sipple wrote:
We have a script wrapper for psql which reads a configuration file and
constructs a psql command to connect to the configured instance of postgres.
We would like to include a search_path setting in the configuraration file
and have the wrapper use that to set the search_path
Hi,
I have a PostgreSQL installation with 8 databases (counting postgres,
template0, and template1). I run 'vacuumdb -z' daily on 3 of the largest
user databases. The vacuumdb logs show the 'max_fsm_pages' need to be
increased with almost each vacuum. So I did a 'vacuumdb -av' on all the
I am trying to upgrade my postgresql data from 7.0.3 to 8.3.7 with marginal
success. I tried pg_dumpall and got the tables but lost most of the data.
I also tried pg_dump but keep getting FATAL 1: Database whatever does not
exist in the system catalog errors. I also tried using the latest
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:19:31AM -0700, stevefoss wrote:
I am trying to upgrade my postgresql data from 7.0.3 to 8.3.7 with
marginal success. I tried pg_dumpall and got the tables but lost
most of the data. I also tried pg_dump but keep getting FATAL 1:
Database whatever does not exist
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:19:31 -0700 (PDT), stevefoss
sfos...@autotraninc.com wrote:
I am trying to upgrade my postgresql data from 7.0.3 to 8.3.7 with
marginal
success. I tried pg_dumpall and got the tables but lost most of the
data.
I also tried pg_dump but keep getting FATAL 1: Database
I am running PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on Windows 2003 Server.
I have a setup where WAL files are archived to another drive on the
same machine. The command looks like this:
archive_command = 'COPY %p F:/recovery/%f'
This works well, but I often get the following error in the log:
[2009-04-17 12:07:34
stevefoss wrote:
I am trying to upgrade my postgresql data from 7.0.3 to 8.3.7 with marginal
success. I tried pg_dumpall and got the tables but lost most of the data.
I also tried pg_dump but keep getting FATAL 1: Database whatever does not
exist in the system catalog errors.
No
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Mary Sipple msip...@iii.com wrote:
We have a script wrapper for psql which reads a configuration file and
constructs a psql command to connect to the configured instance of postgres.
We would like to include a search_path setting in the configuraration file
and
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
Your library problems are likely because you just copied the binary? I
assume you didn't actually install postgresql.
That's what it looked like to me --- you can't just copy an executable
that's been built on a far newer platform. However, you
I can only say for my own little experience. Features like that, allow
users to exchange less (none?) data between app and pg.
That's the main advantage of CTE.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
I'm running into a situation where postmaster is consuming significantly
more memory than I would expect. This only seems to happen when I
combine savepoints with differences between client and database
encoding. I originally discovered this while running some Java code
which uses JDBC (the
Dylan Adams dad...@bybaxter.com writes:
I'm running into a situation where postmaster is consuming significantly
more memory than I would expect. This only seems to happen when I
combine savepoints with differences between client and database
encoding. I originally discovered this while
Tom Lane writes:
I think this example is pretty artificial. The fundamental reason
memory is increasing is that each subtransaction can require
some state
storage. In the example the per-subtransaction CurTransactionContexts
are not getting used for anything except encoding conversion on
51 matches
Mail list logo
