Le 22/12/2010 21:34, Mark Watson a écrit :
> Hello all,
> (Postgres 8.4.6 Windows)
> I am stumped as to why I cannot import this using copy from within pgadmin
> (the following table is created in an existing database with an encoding of
> WIN1252 and the Postgres server_encoding is UTF8) :
> CREAT
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 12:34:58 pm Mark Watson wrote:
> Hello all,
> (Postgres 8.4.6 Windows)
> I am stumped as to why I cannot import this using copy from within pgadmin
> (the following table is created in an existing database with an encoding of
> WIN1252 and the Postgres server_encoding
Hello all,
(Postgres 8.4.6 Windows)
I am stumped as to why I cannot import this using copy from within pgadmin
(the following table is created in an existing database with an encoding of
WIN1252 and the Postgres server_encoding is UTF8) :
CREATE TABLE test
(
col_descr text
)
WITH (
OIDS=FALSE
)
On Wednesday 22. December 2010 20.03.23 Bob Pawley wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am attempting to see if my Postgresql installation is running.
>
> I’ve found this -
> [root user only] ./database_service.pl status
>
> I don’t understand what is meant by root user.
>
> I also don’t know how “./database_serv
On 12/22/2010 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver writes:
On 12/22/2010 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I begin to wonder if the subdirectory $PGDATA/base/26468499 is there at
all?
Alright I am going to show my ignorance here, but why would it not be?
$PGDATA/base/1663/26468499
1663 is the
Original Message
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] "could not accept SSPI security context"
From: Reto Schöning
To: Brar Piening
Date: 22.12.2010 17:08
"The security database on the server does not have a computer account
for this workstation trust relationship"
[...]
Is there anythin
Hi
I am attempting to see if my Postgresql installation is running.
I’ve found this -
[root user only] ./database_service.pl status
I don’t understand what is meant by root user.
I also don’t know how “./database_service.pl status” is used.
Bob
Filip Rembiałkowski wrote:
> 2010/12/21 Andreas Kretschmer :
> >
> > I'm looking for a solution to split read and write access to different
> > servers (streaming replication, you know ...). Can i do that with
> > pgpool? (setting backend_weightX=0 or 1)? I have read the doc, but i'm
> > not sure
Adrian Klaver writes:
> On 12/22/2010 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I begin to wonder if the subdirectory $PGDATA/base/26468499 is there at
>> all?
> Alright I am going to show my ignorance here, but why would it not be?
> $PGDATA/base/1663/26468499
1663 is the pg_default tablespace, which refers
On 12/22/2010 07:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sim Zacks writes:
FATAL: could not open relation 1663/26468499/1259: No such file or
directory
I begin to wonder if the subdirectory $PGDATA/base/26468499 is there at
all?
/var/lib/postgresql/8.2/data/base/26468499 does exist, and there are
1212 files
On 12/22/2010 07:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sim Zacks writes:
FATAL: could not open relation 1663/26468499/1259: No such file or
directory
I begin to wonder if the subdirectory $PGDATA/base/26468499 is there at
all?
/var/lib/postgresql/8.2/data/base/26468499 does exist, and there are
1212 files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
"William Gordon Rutherdale (rutherw)" wrote:
> Clearly something is broken in the system, as it's contradicting itself
> by sending me emails but failing to recognise that same email address
> when I attempt to unsubscribe.
I confirmed that r
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:32:44AM -0500, Andy Chambers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the caveats described in the documentation for table
> inheritance is that foreign key constraints cannot cover the case
> where you want to check that a value is found somewhere in a table
> or in that table's descend
Sim Zacks writes:
>>> FATAL: could not open relation 1663/26468499/1259: No such file or
>>> directory
>> I begin to wonder if the subdirectory $PGDATA/base/26468499 is there at
>> all?
> /var/lib/postgresql/8.2/data/base/26468499 does exist, and there are
> 1212 files in it, but so far all th
On 12/22/2010 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sim Zacks writes:
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
directory
Does the not connect also apply to starting postgres in single user mode?
Same error with single us
On 12/22/2010 07:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sim Zacks writes:
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
directory
Does the not connect also apply to starting postgres in single user mode?
Same error with single u
On 12/22/2010 06:45 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/22/2010 08:37 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
On 12/22/2010 06:28 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/22/2010 07:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
We are using postgresql 8.2.17 on Gentoo
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open r
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Kelly Burkhart
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> have you ruled out sending all the data you need to send into say, a
>> plpgsal function and doing the work there?
>>
>
> Not sure that would do what they need, which is get a list
Sim Zacks writes:
> Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
> ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
> directory
>> Does the not connect also apply to starting postgres in single user mode?
> Same error with single user mode.
> postgres --single -D /v
"Craig Harris" writes:
> does any one know why the SEQSCAN node has TWO TARGETENTRYs?
It doesn't stop to notice that the Var is not referenced by any upper
nodes in this particular scenario.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgre
Hello and thanks for this great application named pgql.
I've setup pg on a windows machine and have installed phppgadmin. The
phppgadmin php application comes up correctly in a browser but I get an error
message when viewing the databases. The apache log shows this:
"[Wed Dec 22 10:27:34 2010]
On 12/22/2010 08:37 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
On 12/22/2010 06:28 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/22/2010 07:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
We are using postgresql 8.2.17 on Gentoo
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
Given:
create table t1 ( c1 timestamp without time zone, c2 int );
explain verbose select to_char ( c1, '' ) from t1
group by to_char ( c1, '' );
does any one know why the SEQSCAN node has TWO TARGETENTRYs?
Why do we project "c1" as well as "to_char( c1 . )" ?
On 12/22/2010 06:28 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 12/22/2010 07:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
We are using postgresql 8.2.17 on Gentoo
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
directory
After one minute of these erro
On 12/22/2010 06:08 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
This is our production database and crashed at the end of the day. If
possible, I would really not like to lose a full days work by restoring
yesterdays backup.
So the errors in postgres started after
On 12/22/2010 07:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
We are using postgresql 8.2.17 on Gentoo
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
directory
After one minute of these errors on every statement run we had what
looks lik
ok we moved to VS08 and I can at last experiment with the npgsql code. I
tried forcing "kerberos" instead of "negotiate" in the call to
AcquireCredentialsHandle in SSPIHandler.cs. The exception message I then get
in the first call to InitializeSecurityContext() is
"The security database on the ser
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Sim Zacks wrote:
> This is our production database and crashed at the end of the day. If
> possible, I would really not like to lose a full days work by restoring
> yesterdays backup.
>
So the errors in postgres started after your server crashed? Sounds
like the
We are using postgresql 8.2.17 on Gentoo
Our postgresql database stopped working with the error
ERROR: could not open relation 1663/26468499/26470404: No such file or
directory
After one minute of these errors on every statement run we had what
looks like a memory failure:
Dec 22 16:37:44 lo
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 December 2010 20:36
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Cc: William Gordon Rutherdale (rutherw)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cannot unsubscribe
>
> On Tuesday 21 December 2010 4:16:00 pm William Gordon Ruth
Filip,
The period type + exclusion constraint was exactly the avenue I was taking, and
I was also perplexed that period was not defined as immutable. Your solution,
to force period() to be immutable, seemed like a reasonable one (though it
didn't work, see below).
I tried implementing this on m
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Kelly Burkhart
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Merlin Moncure writes:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you just unconditionally flush there,
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 7:18:00 am William Gordon Rutherdale (rutherw)
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I haven't a clue what my password is supposed to be.
It would have been in the confirmation reply that you got when you signed up,
on
the off chance you still have it:)
>
> Clearly something
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Kelly Burkhart
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Merlin Moncure writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If you just unconditionally flush there, it will result in an extra
network message in the normal c
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Merlin Moncure writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If you just unconditionally flush there, it will result in an extra
>>> network message in the normal case where there's not another query
>>> to do. The current cod
Hi there,
I wanted to install postgreSQL on a Windows XP machine, but during the
install it says:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3315027/error.png
Anyone knows what to do? The user is an admin, and there is enough free disk
space to write for.
Thanks in advance.
Rens
--
View t
Richard Broersma writes:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Andy Chambers wrote:
>> create table guidebooks (
>> city check (city in (select name
>> from cities)),
> This is a nice idea. They only problem is that PostggreSQL doesn't
> support sub-selects in a tables che
2010/12/22 Thomas Kellerer :
> I'm curious why you use this syntax as you have fixed values and could use
> the "standard" VALUES construct without problems:
>
> INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (1, '2010-01-01', '2010-12-31');
no particular reason; just two keystrokes less :-)
The SQL code is postgres-sp
Filip Rembiałkowski, 22.12.2010 14:28:
INSERT INTO tbl SELECT 1, '2010-01-01', '2010-12-31';
INSERT 0 1
I'm curious why you use this syntax as you have fixed values and could use the
"standard" VALUES construct without problems:
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (1, '2010-01-01', '2010-12-31');
Regards
2010/12/21 McGehee, Robert :
> PostgreSQLers,
> I'm hoping for some help creating a constraint/key on a table such that there
> are no overlapping ranges of dates for any id.
>
> Specifically: Using PostgreSQL 9.0.1, I'm creating a name-value pair table as
> such this:
>
> CREATE TABLE tbl (id IN
Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 10:49 -0500, McGehee, Robert a écrit :
> PostgreSQLers,
> I'm hoping for some help creating a constraint/key on a table such that there
> are no overlapping ranges of dates for any id.
>
> Specifically: Using PostgreSQL 9.0.1, I'm creating a name-value pair table as
Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 10:49 -0500, McGehee, Robert a écrit :
> PostgreSQLers,
> I'm hoping for some help creating a constraint/key on a table such that there
> are no overlapping ranges of dates for any id.
>
> Specifically: Using PostgreSQL 9.0.1, I'm creating a name-value pair table as
interesting project. do you have any documentation describing how it works?
merlin
Hi Merlin,
Thank you for your interest in the project.
Here is how to get it up and running so that you can try out the same
application that you see running on: http://173.230.133.34:8080/
0.
43 matches
Mail list logo