On 31 Dec 2010, at 5:14, tamanna madaan wrote:
Moreover, it cant be waiting for a lock as
other processes were able to update the same table at the same time.
That only means it wasn't waiting on a TABLE-lock, occurrences of which are
quite rare in Postgres. But if, for example, an other
Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 12:05 -0500, Andrew Sullivan a écrit :
[about Abiword]
It's intended as a word processor rather than a text
editor, isn't it?
It works with text files too. It's not a problem.
--
Vincent Veyron
http://marica.fr/
Progiciel de gestion des dossiers de contentieux et
Hi,
I am trying to insert new records from multiple SQL dumps into an existing
table. My problem is that the database table does not have some of the
columns used in the sql dumps. So when I try to import the dumps psql fails
with: ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end
Hey gvim,
2010/12/30 gvim gvi...@gmail.com
Is it possible, with PostgreSQL 9.0, to restrict access to specific table
rows by `id`? I want a user to be able to INSERT new rows but not UPDATE or
DELETE rows with `id` 1616.
I believe that first you need to restrict SELECT. You can do it by
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:44:43AM +0530, tamanna madaan wrote:
However, This is not a very long running query.
This was supposed to update only one row in a table.
That it's supposed to update only one row does not mean it wasn't a
very long running query.
Moreover, it cant be waiting for a
Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com writes:
Stack trace:
#0 0x0031a147c15c in memcpy () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00450cb8 in __memcpy_ichk (tuple=0x7fffb29ac900) at
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:51
#2 heap_copytuple (tuple=0x7fffb29ac900) at heaptuple.c:592
#3
2010/12/31 Håvard Wahl Kongsgård haavard.kongsga...@gmail.com:
Is it possible to overriding the default psql behavior, so that the sql
session simply ignores any missing fields?
Do you still have the original database? Re-run your table exports
without the unneeded columns using COPY, then
Well I created the SQL files from multiple shapefiles. Used the shp2sql (
postgis 1.5) to generate the SQL dumps.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
2010/12/31 Håvard Wahl Kongsgård haavard.kongsga...@gmail.com:
Is it possible to overriding the default psql
Interesting. That's exactly what we have been doing -- trying to update the
same rows in multiple txns. For us to proceed in production, I will take
steps to ensure we stop doing that, as it's just an app bug really.
The table in question -- v_messages -- is an empty base table with 76
Here is the ddl for the tables in question. There are foreign keys to other
tables that I omitted.
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3323804/parts.sql parts.sql
--
View this message in context:
I decided last night to rename my 'public' schema (Not sure of that's
a good / bad idea) since I'm still learning about how schema's work on
PostgreSQL. My question is:
1. If I have a constraint (specifically 'unique') on a specific table,
when I rename the public schema, does that impact my
Hi,
Can I ask for implementing binary in / out at least for following types:
void - usefull when using binary and procudre returns void
acl - in this way that role's/user's name will be visible in binary stream, so
there will be no need to requerying for user's name by the oid.
Kind regards,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:53 PM, bricklen brick...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference in ctid, and the values of xmin and relfrozenxid,
seems to confirm my suspicion that this wasn't just random cosmic rays.
You did something
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:13 PM, bricklen brick...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:53 PM, bricklen brick...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The difference in ctid, and the values of xmin and relfrozenxid,
seems to confirm my
Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com writes:
Here is the ddl for the tables in question. There are foreign keys to other
tables that I omitted.
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3323804/parts.sql parts.sql
Hmmm ... what is message_status_enum? Is that an actual enum type, or
some
bricklen brick...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:53 PM, bricklen brick...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
You did something on the source DB that rewrote the table with a new
relfilenode (possibly CLUSTER or some form of ALTER
Sorry, I left that out. Yeah, I wondered that too, since these tables do
not use toast.
CREATE TYPE message_status_enum AS ENUM ( 'V', 'X', 'S', 'R', 'U', 'D' );
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Tom Lane-2 [via PostgreSQL]
Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, I left that out. Yeah, I wondered that too, since these tables do
not use toast.
Hm. Well, given that the stack trace suggests we're trying to access a
tuple value that's not there (bogus pointer, or data overwritten since
the pointer was
Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com writes:
Enclosed is the query plan -- 21000 lines
Um ... nope?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 2010-12-31, Håvard Wahl Kongsgård haavard.kongsga...@gmail.com wrote:
--90e6ba488359a7721f0498b43825
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am trying to insert new records from multiple SQL dumps into an existing
table. My problem
On Friday 31 December 2010 9:06:19 am Håvard Wahl Kongsgård wrote:
Well I created the SQL files from multiple shapefiles. Used the shp2sql (
postgis 1.5) to generate the SQL dumps.
And the shp2pgsql docs say:
Appends data from the Shape file into the database table. Note that to use
this
Maybe it doesn't work from gmail. I'll try uploading from here.
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3323933/plan.txt plan.txt
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/seg-fault-crashed-the-postmaster-tp3323117p3323933.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL -
I wrote:
The odds seem pretty good that the corrupt compressed data message
has the same origin at bottom, although the lack of any obvious data
to be compressed in this table is confusing. Maybe you could get that
from trying to copy over a garbage value of that one varchar column,
though.
The number of matching rows on these queries is anything from 0 to 1. I
don't think I can tell how many would have matched on the ones that
crashed. Although I suspect it would have been toward the 1 end. I've
been trying to get a reproducable test case with no luck so far.
I assume
Gordon Shannon gordo...@gmail.com writes:
I assume you can now see the plan? I uploaded it twice, once via gmail and
once on Nabble.
Yeah, the Nabble one works. Now I'm even more confused, because the
whole-row var seems to be coming from the outside of the nestloop, which
is about the
Unfortunately it's now impossible to say how many were updated, as they get
deleted by another process later. I may be able to restore part of a dump
from 2 days ago on another machine, and get some counts from that, assuming
I have the disk space. I'll work on that.
I do not believe there
26 matches
Mail list logo
