Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Each
database uses PostGRESSQL which would mean the most amount
On 04/28/2011 10:46 PM, Basil Bourque wrote:
In PL/pgSQL, how does one generically access the fields of the OLD or NEW
record?
I've tried code such as this:
'NEW.' || quote_ident( myColumnNameVar ) || '::varchar'
But when run by an EXECUTE command, I get errors such as:
ERROR: missing
hi,
group by 1 means group by first output column
order by 2 means order by second output column ascending
Am 30.04.2011 19:00, schrieb Joel Reymont:
What is the meaning of
group by 1 order by 2
e.g. what to the numbers 1 and 2 stand for?
What would change if I do the
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 07:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.pgsql-gene...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited
number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted
at different data centers but
On 04/30/11 10:50 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud'
Each database
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 07:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.pgsql-gene...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited
number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted
at
Hoorah! I was able to complete my single PL/pgSQL function to create history
records tracking individual field value changes generically for all my tables.
Some developers call this an audit trail, though an accountant might say
otherwise.
Thanks for all the replies.
Special thanks to John
On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.pgsql-gene...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
hosted at different data centers but linked over a
On 2011-04-30, Jon Smark jon.sm...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Does Postgresql perform short-circuit boolean evaluation both in SQL
and PL/pgSQL functions?
sometimes.
the planner will rearrange what you write,
for this reason it is very likely that
SELECT count(*) FROM foobar WHERE
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the hint! I'm actually doing a GROUP BY with an inquality
search (HAVING...) and still get long lasting queries, see query (2)
below.
I'm doing an equality search with success with the '-' operator on
the same field 'tags' like in this query (1):
-- Count all restaurants in
Jasen Betts ja...@xnet.co.nz writes:
On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.pgsql-gene...@telemetry.co.uk
wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
hosted at
Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com writes:
I'm doing an equality search with success with the '-' operator on
the same field 'tags' like in this query (1):
-- Count all restaurants in database (amenity = restaurant''):
select count(*) from osm_all_v
where hstore(tags)-'amenity'='restaurant'
Tom Lane wrote:
Jasen Betts ja...@xnet.co.nz writes:
On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.pgsql-gene...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:14:07AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I took a quick look at the gnumed schema and found it to be generally
very thorough and excellent. If you're going to use surrogate keys,
that's they way to do it.
Good to know since I'm only a lowly medical doctor not
having
My database crashed and server won't start ...
--
LOG: database system was interrupted while in recovery at 2011-05-01
19:31:37 CEST
HINT: This probably means that some data is corrupted and you will have
to use the last backup for recovery.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Karsten Hilbert
karsten.hilb...@gmx.net wrote:
I must agree with a recent poster
that what appears to identify as a natural key often really
isn't or else becomes not so later on. It's vastly easier to
then deal with that by re-defining constraints without
I've been looking through the Date/Time functions and operators on the docs and
can't find anything obvious to do this simple task - filter a date column for
entries which are later than a specified date.
gvim
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
On 05/01/2011 07:37 PM, gvim wrote:
I've been looking through the Date/Time functions and operators on the
docs and can't find anything obvious to do this simple task - filter a
date column for entries which are later than a specified date.
gvim
Try WHERE date '2011-04-01' replacing the
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:37 PM, gvim gvi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been looking through the Date/Time functions and operators on the docs
and can't find anything obvious to do this simple task - filter a date
column for entries which are later than a specified date.
select * from table where
On 05/01/2011 01:50 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows
Did you find this via
http://www.reversecurity.com/2011/04/new-details-from-psn-hack.html ?
That was the only Google-indexed source leading to it I
20 matches
Mail list logo
