Hi,
We are the following msg in the postgres logs.
"could not create file "base/16384/11500": File exists"
Some links indicate that the issue is related to OIDs.
Please help me in understanding why the message is appearing and how the
issue can be resolved.
Regards,
Harshitha
Hi David,
Thanks, that's exactly what it was.
Jake
On 9 October 2011 10:05, David Johnston wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2011, at 21:45, Jake Stride wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been staring at this for hours and was hoping somebody could
>> point me in the right direction.
>>
>> I have a trigger setup on
2011/10/8 René Fournier
>
> Thanks. Based on some further reading, this is what I came up with, in
> order to hopefully use the GiST index to greatest benefit:
>
> gc3=# SELECT datasetnam, r_hnumf, r_hnuml, r_stname_c, r_placenam,
> ST_Distance(ST_GeomFromText('POINT(-114.053205 51.069644)',4269)
On 9 October 2011 18:38, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/10/9 Pavel Stehule :
>> 2011/10/9 Tom Lane :
>>> Pavel Stehule writes:
2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
> On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> It has a sense - index only scan it is faster (and significantly
>> faster) on w
Hello PostgreSQL members:
I'm a user of PostgreSQL. Now I have a question when using it.
When I want to save a bytea value into a file, what should I do?
Is there any function dealing with that in PostgreSQL? (like lo_export() to
deal with the large-object) (# I didn't find any)
Sorry for int
2011/10/9 Pavel Stehule :
> 2011/10/9 Tom Lane :
>> Pavel Stehule writes:
>>> 2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It has a sense - index only scan it is faster (and significantly
> faster) on wider tables - or tables with strings where TOAST is not
2011/10/9 Tom Lane :
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>> 2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
>>> On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
It has a sense - index only scan it is faster (and significantly
faster) on wider tables - or tables with strings where TOAST is not
active. Maybe there is a so
Pavel Stehule writes:
> 2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
>> On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> It has a sense - index only scan  it is faster (and significantly
>>> faster) on wider tables - or tables with strings where TOAST is not
>>> active. Maybe there is a some issue because on thin ta
On 9 October 2011 11:51, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
>> On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> 2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
On 8 October 2011 21:13, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
>> On 8 October 2011 19:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I did
2011/10/9 Thom Brown :
> On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
>>> On 8 October 2011 21:13, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
> On 8 October 2011 19:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I did it. It is strange, so your times are significantly slo
On 9 October 2011 04:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
>> On 8 October 2011 21:13, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> 2011/10/8 Thom Brown :
On 8 October 2011 19:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> I did it. It is strange, so your times are significantly slower than I
>>> have. Have
Thank you.
I got also the following code:
First import the XML into a staging table:
CREATE TABLE xml_import
(
xml_data xml
)
with product_list as (
select
unnest(xpath('/soap12:Envelope/soap12:Body/pl:GetProductListResponse/pl:GetProductListResult/pl:ProductList/pl:Product',
xml_data,
You can do this by converting the characters in raw dump file directly.
iconv -f 8859_1 -t UTF-8 backup.db.psql > backup.db.psql.utf8
Then convert the line in backup.db.psql.utf8 from:
SET client_encoding = 'SQL_ASCII';
to:
SET client_encoding = 'UTF8';
--
View this message in context:
http:/
There was dblink contrib module which reads data from other PostgreSql
database using tcp/ip connection.
Maybe there is similar for http/asmx data retrieval ?
About periodic call of stored procedure, is there cron contrib for PosgreSql
? Or can we force some code call on autofacuum or after
eve
14 matches
Mail list logo