Jeff Janes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:25 AM, mads.tand...@schneider-electric.com wrote:
I have a question about sync streaming replication.
I have 2 postgresql 9.1 servers set up with streaming replication. On the
master node the slave is configured as a synchronous standby. I've
Hi,
I am currently working on a conversion project. We plan to make our application
PostgreSQL compliant. And for this we have chosen PosgreSQL 9.2.4.
Currently our application works along with Oracle 11g. In Oracle schema we have
created Synonyms. The context is this: In Oracle schema we have
Panneerselvam Posangu wrote:
I am currently working on a conversion project. We plan to make our
application PostgreSQL compliant.
And for this we have chosen PosgreSQL 9.2.4.
Currently our application works along with Oracle 11g. In Oracle schema we
have created Synonyms. The
context is
Panneerselvam Posangu, 05.06.2013 11:30:
Currently our application works along with Oracle 11g. In Oracle
schema we have created Synonyms. The context is this: In Oracle
schema we have couple of users. They own tables, views, and other
objects. We create synonyms for a given object ,grant needed
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote:
Jeff Janes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:25 AM, mads.tand...@schneider-electric.com
wrote:
I have a question about sync streaming replication.
I have 2 postgresql 9.1 servers set up with streaming replication.
On 05/06/2013 03:02, 任洪彩 wrote:
Hi,
Yes, you are right.
But -d option not suitable for me. Because our flatform use -C option
and -d template1 option to create the database described in the dump
file to restore the dump file.
The whole command like this:
#
It appears that the culprit is a cached query plan, the tables in the UNION
have changed and no long match however the View does not throw a each
UNION query must have the same number of columns error.
Is there a way to force the View's query plan to be updated on each access?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Mike Summers msummer...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that the culprit is a cached query plan, the tables in the UNION
have changed and no long match however the View does not throw a each UNION
query must have the same number of columns error.
Is there a way to
From what I'm reading the View is frozen when it's created, including it's
plan, and the usual solution is to use a set returning function... is this
not true?
I've double checked all schemas and the view is only defined once.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Mike Summers msummer...@gmail.com wrote:
From what I'm reading the View is frozen when it's created, including it's
plan, and the usual solution is to use a set returning function... is this
not true?
No it is not. Here:
smarlowe=# create table a (id int);
Note that the view DEFINITION is frozen, the query PLAN is NOT.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Thanks Scott, interesting.
Other than the tests in the original post do you have any suggestions?
Thanks for your time.
On 05/06/2013 13:20, 私人邮箱 wrote:
no，I can't...
Actually the dump file comes from another site...
在 2013-6-5，19:28，Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie 写道：
On 05/06/2013 03:02, 任洪彩 wrote:
Hi,
Yes, you are right.
But -d option not suitable for me. Because our flatform use -C option
and -d
Mike Summers msummer...@gmail.com writes:
Other than the tests in the original post do you have any suggestions?
If you're speaking of
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJGeMG89QbDxMab7-aPD_yXVsGx7Q=auxym9ufvaq06crz4...@mail.gmail.com
that has nothing to do with cached plans, obsolete or
Thanks Tom,
I've found other discussion of this, that aggregates foul-up the planner
with views.
GROUP BY DISTINCT don't work, we're trying to grab a subset of records
and backfill any nulls to present a complete, single record... we're stuck
with a view as this is used by a Rails app.
We'll
Hi,
I am currently working on a conversion project. We plan to make our application
PostgreSQL compliant. And for this we have chosen PosgreSQL 9.2.4.
Currently our application works along with Oracle 11g. In Oracle schema we have
created Synonyms. The context is this: In Oracle schema we have
no，I can't...
Actually the dump file comes from another site...
在 2013-6-5，19:28，Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie 写道：
On 05/06/2013 03:02, 任洪彩 wrote:
Hi,
Yes, you are right.
But -d option not suitable for me. Because our flatform use -C option
and -d template1 option to create the database
Hello,
I'm running this PostGIS Raster query
select
st_scalex(rast),
st_scaley(rast),
st_skewx(rast),
st_skewy(rast),
st_width(rast),
st_height(rast),
rid,
st_upperleftx(rast),
st_upperlefty(rast),
st_numbands(rast)
from
my_postgis_raster_table
I want to remark that, even when
I posted this question on StackOverflow, and the only person to answer
recommended I ask these lists for more details and link to the question:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16927331/postgresql-point-ops-with-gist-postgis-spatial-index
My question is:
The 9.0 release
Well, your objects are larger than the page size, so you're getting them out of
the toast tables, not directly out of main storage. You may also have your type
declared as 'main' storage, which means it's zipped up, so it's being unzipped
before you can access it, that's also an overhead.
Hi All,
I would like to ask for some suggestions regarding the following scenario.
I have a cash drawer table and for each cash drawer I have a function that
collects and transforms data from different tables (and a web service using
www_fdw). In normal scenarios I would have a function to
Create the gist index on table containing points using the following syntax:
CREATE INDEX index name ON table name USING GIST (geometry column name);
After the index is created use the criteria st_contains(polygon,point) in the
where clause of select statement:
Select * from tablename where
I've setup two 9.2.4 servers to serve as master-slave in a streaming
replication scenario. I started with a fresh database on the master, setup the
replication, then imported using pg_restore about 30GB of data. The master and
slave are geographically separated, so replication of this amount
On 6/5/2013 1:39 PM, David Greco wrote:
I've setup two 9.2.4 servers to serve as master-slave in a streaming
replication scenario. I started with a fresh database on the master,
setup the replication, then imported using pg_restore about 30GB of
data. The master and slave are geographically
Ioana Danes wrote
Hi All,
Is there any similar syntax that only invokes the procedure once and
returns all the columns?
Generic, adapt to fit your needs.
WITH func_call AS (
SELECT function_call(...) AS func_out_col
)
SELECT (func_out_col).*
FROM func_call;
Basically you have to execute the
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org]
on behalf of John R Pierce [pie...@hogranch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 5:00 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble with replication
On 6/5/2013 1:39 PM, David Greco wrote:
I’ve
Pardon my lack of specificity. I'm familiar with spatial indexes and at
least somewhat familiar with ST_Contains and its internal bounding box
check. Maybe it would help to clarify why I found this point_ops operator
class so interesting. Currently, my queries are often getting bad estimates
for
On 06/05/2013 05:20 AM, 私人邮箱 wrote:
no，I can't...
Actually the dump file comes from another site...
So use the -f option to pg_restore to save the custom format file to a
text file. Edit the text file and then run using psql.
Ex:
pg_restore -C -f whatever_name.sql
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:23 AM, David Greco david_gr...@harte-hanks.comwrote:
On the master or on the slave, or on both? I thought shipping the archived
WAL files from the master to the slave did this already?
In your case you need to transfer the WAL files using streaming
replication, so
On 06/05/2013 06:17 PM, 任洪彩 wrote:
Hmm...It seem like a wonderful solution.
But, i can't change the way to restore.
Then you will not be able to do what you want.
For some reason, the way to restore as follows.
pg_restore -C -h xxx -p xxx -U xxx -d template1 -e -v xxx.pgdump
Does any one
Hmm...It seem like a wonderful solution.
But, i can't change the way to restore.
For some reason, the way to restore as follows.
pg_restore -C -h xxx -p xxx -U xxx -d template1 -e -v xxx.pgdump
Does any one can give a clarification about whether the dump file support
modify?
By the way, dump
31 matches
Mail list logo
