2013/7/15 Luca Ferrari :
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Vincenzo Romano
> wrote:
>
>> I am only concerned about how late is done the binding between a table
>> name and the actual OID for other functions, views and triggers.
>
>
> Well, it should work like this: once the parser decides that a
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Granthana Biswas
wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. Have you implemented this while sharding your
> database? Did it cause any performance issues?
I used it for just several mission critical featured in one project,
not widely. What about performance issues - it
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Vincenzo Romano
wrote:
> I am only concerned about how late is done the binding between a table
> name and the actual OID for other functions, views and triggers.
Well, it should work like this: once the parser decides that a query
looks good, it seaches for the
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Granthana Biswas
wrote:
> Inspite of being aware that PLPROXY does autocommit for DML functions called
> on shards, I was wondering if there is any way around to put a set of DML
> functions called from Router on shards inside a transaction so that all
> updates o
Thanks for your reply. I will take a look.
Kul.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Build-RPM-from-Postgres-Source-tp5763633p5763746.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsq
Robert James wrote
> I'd like a stored procedure which does something like:
>
> INSERT INTO...
> SELECT... -- This should be returned as multicolumn, multifield - just
> like a table or view
>
> When I run it, though, instead of getting a table, I get one field
> with all the data in it as a comp
I'd like a stored procedure which does something like:
INSERT INTO...
SELECT... -- This should be returned as multicolumn, multifield - just
like a table or view
When I run it, though, instead of getting a table, I get one field
with all the data in it as a compound type. I'd like to return the
I don't believe you can use JOIN explicitly in this situation because it's
an UPDATE, but I believe you can accomplish the same effect with FROM and
WHERE.
UPDATE table SET column1 = TRUE
FROM table2
WHERE table1.event_id = table2.event_id;
I would make sure there's an index on table2.event_id if
2013/7/14 Luca Ferrari :
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Vincenzo Romano
> wrote:
>> Hi all
>> I'm making some experiments with table archiving and I'd like to
>> "replace" a full table F with an empty one E.
>> In order to do this I see only one way:
>>
>> ALTER TABLE F RENAME TO T;
>> ALTER T
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Vincenzo Romano
wrote:
> Hi all
> I'm making some experiments with table archiving and I'd like to
> "replace" a full table F with an empty one E.
> In order to do this I see only one way:
>
> ALTER TABLE F RENAME TO T;
> ALTER TABLE E RENAME TO F;
> ALTER TABLE T
Nevermind, got the answer here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17638774/syntax-error-at-or-near-on
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hello!
In PostgreSQL 8.4.13 why do I please get the syntax error
ERROR: syntax error at or near "on"
LINE: ... references balkan_users(id) check (id <> author) on delete ...
for the following 2 statements?
create table balkan_users (
id varchar(32) primary key,
first_name varch
2013/7/14 Haiming Zhang :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am using postgres 9.1, I have a question about updating big table. Here is
> the basic information of this table.
>
> 1. This table has one primary key and other 11 columns.
>
> 2. It also has a trigger that before updat
Hi All,
I am using postgres 9.1, I have a question about updating big table. Here is
the basic information of this table.
1. This table has one primary key and other 11 columns.
2. It also has a trigger that before update records, another
table got updated first.
14 matches
Mail list logo
