On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Robert James srobertja...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to set a variable or parameter for a query?
I have a long query where a certain variable needs to be easy to
change. I'd like to do something like:
threshold = 10.3
SELECT... WHERE x
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Corbett, James
james.corb...@cra-arc.gc.ca wrote:
Hello all:
My first official message so please be gentle with me.
I’m attempting to make a new JDBC Connection Profile via my Eclipse IDE.
Apparently it’s looking for the following jar in the driver wizard:
- Is your postgres server actually up and running?
- Did you add localhost to the addresses served by postgres in pg_hba.conf
(with proper permissions)?
- Have you considered upgrading your postgres installation to a current
version? 8.0.0-rc1 is WAY obsolete.
On 23 March 2013 15:13, News
I noticed on the postgresql website that a certain *Julian Assange* is
mentioned among the contributors to Postgresql.
Out of curiosity, could anybody post in short what exactly he contributed
to the DB?
Thanks, RD
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:15 AM, ERR ORR rd0...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed on the postgresql website that a certain Julian Assange is
mentioned among the contributors to Postgresql.
Out of curiosity, could anybody post in short what exactly he contributed to
the DB?
You can find a list of
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ERR ORR rd0...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed on the postgresql website that a certain Julian Assange is
mentioned among the contributors to Postgresql.
Out of curiosity, could anybody post in short what exactly he contributed to
the DB?
Hi,
I'm talking about our own massively bloated toast table - described in
an earlier post - that I think I can replicate. I didn't mean to
steal your thread, but the problem seems very similar, and we're using
9.1. I don't know a lot about Postgres internals, but to me it smells
like a bug of
I have done the following test pn v9.2.4 with two concurrent sessions:
-- session no.1
tmp1=# create table t1 ( t text );
CREATE TABLE
Tempo: 37,351 ms
tmp1=# create table t2 ( t text );
CREATE TABLE
Tempo: 33,363 ms
tmp1=# create or replace function f1( out tx text )
tmp1-# language plpgsql
Hi,
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 14:37 -0700, ktewari1 wrote:
Hi,
I need to have some different settings(like NAMEDATALEN etc.) and
that's why I'm trying to build postgres from the source and to create an rpm
to be send for install.
Now, the build works fine but, I don't see a way to
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:52 PM, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
Also have a look here
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Using_pg_upgrade_on_Ubuntu/Debian
Thanks a lot, I could successfully upgrade my server
--
Best Regards
Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
Howdy,
After upgrading my Pg from 9.1 to 9.2 the avaliable pgAdmin in ubuntu
21.10 reporotiy can't deal with Pg 9.2.
How can I get recent pgAdmin version for ubuntu 12.10?
P.S.
- I tried ppa:pitti/postgresql but it doesn’t contain on suitable
pgAdmin version for Pg 9.2
- I don’t prefer to build
2013/7/17 Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi mbno...@gmail.com:
Howdy,
After upgrading my Pg from 9.1 to 9.2 the avaliable pgAdmin in ubuntu
21.10 reporotiy can't deal with Pg 9.2.
How can I get recent pgAdmin version for ubuntu 12.10?
P.S.
- I tried ppa:pitti/postgresql but it doesn’t contain on
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 14:37 -0700, ktewari1 wrote:
Hi,
I need to have some different settings(like NAMEDATALEN etc.) and
that's why I'm trying to build postgres from the source and to create an rpm
to be send
2013/7/17 Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi mbno...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Vincenzo Romano
vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it wrote:
Once you sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pitti/postgresql then you go in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitti* and you replace the word with your
Ubuntu version with
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Vincenzo Romano
vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it wrote:
Once you sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pitti/postgresql then you go in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitti* and you replace the word with your
Ubuntu version with precise. By doing so you'll install that version
into
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Vincenzo Romano
vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it wrote:
Did you run apt-get update once you did che change?
sure yes.
--
Best Regards
Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Hi All,
I have an interesting query scenario I'm trying to understand.
I came across this while investigating a slow query in our application.
I've been able to reproduce the scenario in a psql script that sets up the
tables and runs the queries.
Script here http://pastebin.com/CBkdDmWp if
Looby, Denis denis.lo...@hp.com writes:
What I don't understand is why the plan is different just because the
group_id = has changed value?
Does the planner have some statistical info on the contents of non-indexed
rows?
Of course. In this case it knows that a nestloop would be a loser
I have a long running stored procedure that pulls data from 2-3 tables,
updates columns in a row in the IMPORT_STATUS table, creates a couple of
temp tables, and then deletes/inserts/updates back into 3-4 tables...
but never once does anything directly with the USER table.
The long running
guys,
have to use legacy 8.1.
i have 100,000 tables in a schema that need to be queried (optimizing this
by combining them into one will have to wait).
so my query goes like so:
execute 'select * from ' || tabname::regclass || ' where firstname =
john' into e;
but i am getting an error:
On 07/17/2013 02:39 PM, John Smith wrote:
guys,
have to use legacy 8.1.
i have 100,000 tables in a schema that need to be queried (optimizing
this by combining them into one will have to wait).
so my query goes like so:
execute 'select * from ' || tabname::regclass || ' where firstname =
On 07/17/2013 02:39 PM, John Smith wrote:
guys,
have to use legacy 8.1.
i have 100,000 tables in a schema that need to be queried (optimizing
this by combining them into one will have to wait).
so my query goes like so:
execute 'select * from ' || tabname::regclass || ' where firstname =
John Smith-54 wrote
guys,
have to use legacy 8.1.
i have 100,000 tables in a schema that need to be queried (optimizing this
by combining them into one will have to wait).
so my query goes like so:
execute 'select * from ' || tabname::regclass || ' where firstname =
john' into e;
John Smith wrote on 17.07.2013 22:39:
guys,
have to use legacy 8.1.
i have 100,000 tables in a schema that need to be queried (optimizing this by
combining them into one will have to wait).
so my query goes like so:
execute 'select * from ' || tabname::regclass || ' where firstname =
Hello,
I'd like to ask a common question about scale out for postgres.
Our current data volume is about 500GB ~ 1TB in one pg cluster(postgres 9.2).
We've set up master/slave replication to keep sync.
To reach better performance from apps side, we want to use pgbounder like app
to split
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:10:37PM +0800, Xiang Jun Wu wrote:
- Hello,
-
- I'd like to ask a common question about scale out for postgres.
-
- Our current data volume is about 500GB ~ 1TB in one pg cluster(postgres 9.2).
We've set up master/slave replication to keep sync.
- To reach better
david, you're right. i didn't realize it had to be executed inside a
function so now i'm trying this:
-- create function
create or replace function get_tables(sname varchar) returns record as $$
select tablename from pg_tables where schemaname = $1;
$$ language 'plpgsql';
-- query tables
John Smith-54 wrote
any help?
Sorry.
Its hard enough teaching people via e-mail let alone teaching them on an
unsupported version of PostgreSQL that has reduced functionality with
respect to function writing compared to the more recent versions.
You are going to need to some kind of FOR loop
Thanks.
I have fixed the problem. And now the query can run in 4 mins for 1.5 million
records in TABLE1 and 0.5 million records in TABLE2.
The solution is I created a function that gets all event_id from TABLE2 then
travel through each event_id and do the update for TABLE1. This removes the
29 matches
Mail list logo
