Jing Fan wrote:
If the grouping inside CTE is executed, I don't think it would generate
result like
src_id | dest_id | dist
+-+--
3384 |6236 |1
3384 |1739 |2
3384 |6236 |3
3384 |1739 |4
3384 |6236 |5
3384 |
Steve Crawford wrote:
There is a comment in utils/adt/formatting.c:
* This function does very little error checking, e.g.
* to_timestamp('20096040','MMDD') works
I think the place for such warnings in addition to the source-code is in
the documentation. This or similar issues with
Hi everybody. I downloaded and tested 9.3 beta 1 back in june and used
for a while.
Today I upgraded to 9.3.1 but just discovered that database cannot be
directly used, so I need to switch back to the beta version in order to
dump the data.
Is there any site I can download the old beta rpm's ?
On 11/5/2013 10:29 AM, Steve Crawford wrote:
The to_date and to_timestamp functions do minimal input error-checking
and are intended for conversion of non-standard formats that cannot be
handled by casting. These functions will attempt to convert illegal
dates to the best of their ability,
Hello,
How advisable or well known is it to take a 9.0 era db directly to 9.3
using the latest pg_upgrade binary?
I imagine that the upgrade path between adjacent major versions is more
battle tested, but we have several dbs that we would like to bring up to
date without meandering through ever
Hello List :D
I'm working on RBAC implementation over posgresql and I was wondering is
there any common technique to achieve row level access control ?
So far I'm considering using WITH clause in template like this:
WITH table_name AS ( SELECT . ) user_query;
Which would be just prepended
Hi eveyone,
I've been trying to understand the text search parser's behaviour.
Looking at the source code [1] it seems as if there was a
sophisticated FSM mapping the input string to a list of tuples of
category (as defined in [1], lines 32-56, or [2]) and a substring from
the original one order
Maciej Mrowiec wrote:
I'm working on RBAC implementation over posgresql and I was wondering is
there any common technique to
achieve row level access control ?
So far I'm considering using WITH clause in template like this:
WITH table_name AS ( SELECT . ) user_query;
Which would
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:27:52 -0800 (PST)
David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bill Moran wrote
How long that takes is a factor of other settings (as David mentioned) and
also depedent on what other transactions may be running.
While I am inclined to believe this is true the documentation
I don't think that there will be too much trouble, as long as you follow
every changelog tip (9.0-9.1, 9.1-9.2 and 9.2-9.3)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Greg Burek g...@heroku.com wrote:
Hello,
How advisable or well known is it to take a 9.0 era db directly to 9.3
using the latest
I am sorry but I still don't understand why it doesn't work. Possibly I
misunderstand how with recursive works?
In my opinion,
with recursive table as{
seed statement
union
recursive statement
}
In every iteration, It will just generate results from seed statement union
recursive
Jing Fan wrote:
I am sorry but I still don't understand why it doesn't work. Possibly I
misunderstand how with
recursive works?
In my opinion,
with recursive table as{
seed statement
union
recursive statement
}
In every iteration, It will just generate results from seed
But after this iteration, the paths will be:
A B 1
B C 1
C B 1
A C 2
A B 3
in next iteration, the recursive statement will generate (A,C,2), (A,B,3),
and (A,C,4), after the group by, it will still be (A,C,2) and (A,B,3)
so I think it should stop after this iteration.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:10
Jing Fan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Let's assume that we have three nodes A, B and C.
Also, A points to B, B points to C and C points to B.
Let's assume that we already generated (A, B, 1) and (A, C, 2)
in previous iterations.
Then
Yeah, that can explain why it doesn't work.
Thank you very much:)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote:
Jing Fan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at
wrote:
Let's assume that we have three nodes A, B and C.
On 11/06/2013 01:06 AM, Greg Burek wrote:
Hello,
How advisable or well known is it to take a 9.0 era db directly to 9.3
using the latest pg_upgrade binary?
Sure. I have done it all the way back to 8.3 (with 9.2). You should of
course test as pg_upgrade is a tool not a perfect solution.
Hi all,
I recently installed 9.3 into my work servers.
With 9.2 I had streaming replication working. Primary server is on
nirvana, standby server is on dukkha.
Upgrade on nirvana went just fine--no problems there. Initial
installation on dukkha went fine as well, but streaming replication
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Jeff Ross jr...@wykids.org wrote:
_postgresql@nirvana:/var/postgresql $ cat start_hot_standby.sh
#!/bin/sh
backup_label=wykids_`date +%Y-%m-%d`
#remove any existing wal files on the standby
ssh dukkha.internal rm -rf /wal/*
#stop the standby server if it is
Hi,
I have Postgres full text search set up for my application and it's been
working great! However, my users would like their searches to turn up
parts of URLs. For example, they would like a search for foobar to
turn up a document that contains the string
http://example.com/foobar/blah;
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.comwrote:
Hi,
I have Postgres full text search set up for my application and it's been
working great! However, my users would like their searches to turn up
parts of URLs. For example, they would like a search for foobar
On 11/06/2013 01:47 PM, bricklen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.com mailto:zev-pg...@strangersgate.com wrote:
Hi,
I have Postgres full text search set up for my application and it's
been working great! However, my users would like
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.comwrote:
On 11/06/2013 01:47 PM, bricklen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.com mailto:zev-pg...@strangersgate.com wrote:
Hi,
I have Postgres full text search set up
On 11/06/2013 02:04 PM, bricklen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.com mailto:zev-pg...@strangersgate.com wrote:
On 11/06/2013 01:47 PM, bricklen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Zev Benjamin
zev-pg...@strangersgate.com
On 11/6/13, 11:32 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Jeff Ross jr...@wykids.org
mailto:jr...@wykids.org wrote:
_postgresql@nirvana:/var/postgresql $ cat start_hot_standby.sh
#!/bin/sh
backup_label=wykids_`date +%Y-%m-%d`
#remove any existing wal files on
moving from 8.1 to 9.3, and redesigning at the same time (using navicat and
psql).
have access to both 8.1 and 9.3. and by redesigning i mean, going from
multiple databases to multiple schemas.
so what's the best approach?
On 11/06/2013 03:08 PM, zach cruise wrote:
moving from 8.1 to 9.3, and redesigning at the same time (using navicat and
psql).
have access to both 8.1 and 9.3. and by redesigning i mean, going from multiple
databases to multiple schemas.
so what's the best approach?
Having just done that, I
26 matches
Mail list logo
