On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Anupama Ramaswamy anumr_0...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lets suppose at this point there is 0 delivery lag but bytes of replay
lag.
All your answers are here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html
Standby mode is exited and the server switches
Anupama Ramaswamy wrote:
I would like to setup a 2 servers with streaming replication, one master and
another hot standby.
I want to use the standby for read-only queries. So I want the replication
lag to be as small as
possible.
So I choose streaming replication over WAL shipping.
When
Jack.O'Sullivan wrote:
I am working for a client who is interested in migrating from Oracle to
Postgres. Their database is
currently ~20TB in size, and is growing. The biggest table in this database
is effectively a BLOB
store and currently has around 1 billion rows.
From reading around
2014-04-12 15:04 GMT+02:00 Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net:
On 04/12/2014 06:29 AM, Rémi Cura wrote:
(please note that this random string function is NOT the good way to
do it, i should random int then use it as index to an array
containing all the letter)
Thanks a lot for this new
On 11/04/2014 16:45, Jack.O'sulli...@tessella.com wrote:
With point two, does this mean that any table with a bytea datatype is
limited to 4 billion rows (which would seem in conflict with the
unlimited rows shown by http://www.postgresql.org/about)? If we had
rows where the bytea was a null
On 09/04/2014 22:40, CS_DBA wrote:
Hi All;
We have a client with this requirement:
At rest data must be encrypted with a unique client key
Any thoughts on how to pull this off for PostgreSQL stored data?
Some time ago I did this, mostly as an experiment but IIRC it works
decently:
Hello,
Don't know if this is better asked on the CentOS ML or here, but...
CentOS 6 supplies 8.4.20 but I want to use hot standby - the issue is that the
PGDG
packages don't install into the usual place they are installed in version
specific directories,
including the data, binaries,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
CentOS 6 supplies 8.4.20 but I want to use hot standby - the issue is that
the PGDG
packages don't install into the usual place they are installed in
version specific directories,
including the data, binaries, libraries
On 04/14/2014 09:02 AM, Moshe Jacobson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com
mailto:scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
CentOS 6 supplies 8.4.20 but I want to use hot standby - the issue is that
the PGDG
packages don't install into the usual place they are
Hi,
I am facing below *-lpgport *issue while installing pg_bulkload utility on
fedora 14 OS.
Details:
*OS* : *Fedora 14*
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 18
23:57:44 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
*PG* : PostgreSQL 8.4.9
*pg_bulkload* 3.1.4
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
How did you deal with binaries and libraries, as well as third party apps
like perl modules or php/apache modules?
All of this is managed through the /etc/alternatives system. I'm honestly
not sure how all of it works,
On 04/14/2014 06:21 AM, chiru r wrote:
Hi,
I am facing below *-lpgport *issue while installing pg_bulkload utility
on fedora 14 OS.
Details:
*OS* : *Fedora 14*
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 18
23:57:44 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
*PG* :
Actually Just what the docs say:
http://pgbulkload.projects.pgfoundry.org/pg_bulkload.html#install
$ cd pg_bulkload
$ make USE_PGXS=1
$ su
$ make USE_PGXS=1 install
Thanks Adrian...
USE_PGXS is already present in MAKEFILE.
simple make and Make Install is working fine in Centos 5.9,i have
On 04/14/2014 07:21 AM, chiru r wrote:
Actually Just what the docs say:
http://pgbulkload.projects.__pgfoundry.org/pg_bulkload.__html#install
http://pgbulkload.projects.pgfoundry.org/pg_bulkload.html#install
$ cd pg_bulkload
$ make USE_PGXS=1
$ su
$ make USE_PGXS=1
On 04/14/2014 07:21 AM, chiru r wrote:
Actually Just what the docs say:
http://pgbulkload.projects.__pgfoundry.org/pg_bulkload.__html#install
http://pgbulkload.projects.pgfoundry.org/pg_bulkload.html#install
$ cd pg_bulkload
$ make USE_PGXS=1
$ su
$ make USE_PGXS=1
On Monday, April 14, 2014 09:13:51 AM Steve Clark wrote:
How did you deal with binaries and libraries, as well as third party apps
like perl modules or php/apache modules?
The 8.4 library package usually ends up installed to satisfy other package
requirements.
Binaries get handled through the
Okay,installed postgresql-devel.x86_64 package on fedora14 OS.
Google blogs says it seems Fedora Postgresql-devel package not
supported libpgport.
*http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4ee2338f.1040...@dunslane.net
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4ee2338f.1040...@dunslane.net*
Is there
I have several related tables that represent a call state. Let's think of
these as phone calls to simplify things. Sometimes I need to determine the
last time a user was called, the last time a user answered a call, or the
last time a user completed a call.
The basic schema is something like
Hi all. I'm trying to make an efficient query to list all documents related
to a company and also documents related to employees and projects for that
company. I have this sample-schema: create table entity( id integer primary
key, entity_type varchar not null, check (entity_type IN
I have been struggling to install slony 2.0 for past few days.
Linux server detail : Linux vmbndbdev01 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun
22 12:19:21 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have 2 versions of postgresql installed 8.4.18 and 9.1.12, but only 9.x is
in use.
I get following
On 04/14/2014 07:56 AM, chiru r wrote:
Okay,installed postgresql-devel.x86_64 package on fedora14 OS.
Google blogs says it seems Fedora Postgresql-devel package not
supported libpgport.
_http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4ee2338f.1040...@dunslane.net
The bigger issue is that the RedHat
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:27:29 -0700
Robert DiFalco robert.difa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several related tables that represent a call state.
And so on for calls_connected, calls_completed, call_errors, etc.
So for my question -- is the choice between these a personal preference
sort of
Hi,
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:13 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
How did you deal with binaries and libraries, as well as third party
apps like perl modules or php/apache modules?
I added Provides: to each package, along with a ldconfig file, so that
the dependencies are satisfied.
Regards,
--
But then I lose a bunch of data like the TIMESTAMPTZ of the call, answer,
connection, etc. Btw, currently these tables never need to be UPDATEd. They
are immutable in the current design. And in the end I'm not sure how the
proposal of one table and a state that is updatable changes the basic
On 04/14/2014 04:22 PM, Robert DiFalco wrote:
But then I lose a bunch of data like the TIMESTAMPTZ of the call,
answer, connection, etc. Btw, currently these tables never need to be
UPDATEd. They are immutable in the current design. And in the end I'm
not sure how the proposal of one table and
Thanks so much. That clarifies.
-Anupama
On Monday, April 14, 2014 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Anupama Ramaswamy anumr_0...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lets suppose at this point there is 0 delivery lag but bytes of replay
lag.
All
Thanks for your response.
So are you saying that if I setup the following in my recovery.conf
restore_command =.
It will it be used only when the streaming replication falls behind more than (
wal_keep_segments ) or replication stream is not available (master goes down) ?
Thanks for your
Hi Folks,
I set up postgresql on a CentOS 5 Linux months ago. I had a process that
ran every night and connected to the database. Everything was working fine
until a few days ago when my process tried to connect and failed. Now I'm
getting:
# service postgresql status
postgresql: unrecognized
On 04/14/2014 05:33 PM, Augori wrote:
Hi Folks,
I set up postgresql on a CentOS 5 Linux months ago. I had a process that
ran every night and connected to the database. Everything was working
fine until a few days ago when my process tried to connect and failed.
Now I'm getting:
# service
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
It's certainly possible that software updates have occurred. There are a
lot of people working on this machine, so I'm not aware of which changes
have been
Augori aug...@gmail.com writes:
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
Sure looks that way.
It's certainly possible that software updates have occurred. There are a
lot of people working on
On 4/14/2014 5:33 PM, Augori wrote:
# service postgresql status
postgresql: unrecognized service
Does this mean it's gone? Does anyone have any suggestions?
the 'service' command on rhel/centos/etc runs /etc/rc.d/init.d/$1 $2
so, ls -l /etc/rc.d/init.d/postgres*and see what the service
Things like this. AVG ring time before answer, average connected call
duration. % of calls never answered. % of calls that are answered that are
connected. Number of times John has answered a call versus how many times
we've called him.That sort of stuff.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Rob
On 4/14/2014 7:17 PM, Augori wrote:
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
It's certainly possible that software updates have occurred. There
are a lot of people working on this machine, so I'm
On 4/14/2014 7:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Augoriaug...@gmail.com writes:
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
Sure looks that way.
It's certainly possible that software updates have occurred.
On 04/14/2014 07:17 PM, Augori wrote:
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
Yes, it is not running.
It's certainly possible that software updates have occurred. There are
a lot of people
On 04/14/2014 07:52 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/14/2014 7:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Augoriaug...@gmail.com writes:
Here's what the ps command gives:
root@server# ps ax | grep post
9165 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep post
Does this mean it's not running?
Sure looks that way.
It's certainly
Hi all,
woohoo!
service postgresql-9.2 status
(pid 9924) is running...
It seems that I was looking for the service by the wrong name, as John
guessed correcty.Also, Tom, it's good to know that the data won't
necessarily go away if I need to reinstall at some point.
thank you so much
On 04/14/2014 08:25 PM, Augori wrote:
Hi all,
woohoo!
service postgresql-9.2 status
(pid 9924) is running...
It seems that I was looking for the service by the wrong name, as
John guessed correcty.Also, Tom, it's good to know that the data
won't necessarily go away if I need to
Hi all,
I'm experiencing an issue where certain queries appear to
non-deterministically hang, with a CPU pinned at 100%.
I say hang, where really I've given up after ~12 hours execution. The
exact same query can then be terminated and run in 90 seconds, with none
of the underlying data changing.
Fenn Bailey fenn.bai...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing an issue where certain queries appear to
non-deterministically hang, with a CPU pinned at 100%.
I say hang, where really I've given up after ~12 hours execution. The
exact same query can then be terminated and run in 90 seconds, with
41 matches
Mail list logo
