Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of
a file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
dot-slash notation preferred by many unix users:
./script.psql
While still allowing the traditional (and Windows compatible) style:
psql -f script.psql
No hope here?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Sergey Konoplev gray...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
PostgreSQL 9.2.7, Linux 2.6.32
Several days ago I found one of my servers out of connections,
pg_stat_activity showed that everything was waiting for the DROP/ALTER
INDEX transaction (see the record
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Pennebaker
andrew.penneba...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of
a file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
dot-slash notation preferred by many unix users:
On 07/18/2014 08:16 AM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line
of a file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
dot-slash notation preferred by many unix users:
./script.psql
While still allowing the traditional
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
wrote:
On 07/18/2014 08:16 AM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line
of a file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
dot-slash notation
Hi:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Andrew Pennebaker
andrew.penneba...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of a
file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with dot-slash
notation preferred by many unix users:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:32:53AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line
of a file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
dot-slash notation preferred by many unix users:
./script.psql
While still
On 07/18/2014 08:52 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:32:53AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
I think the OP is talking about executable scripts so both of
$ psql -f the-file.sql
and
$ ./the-file.sql
(where the-file.sql starts with #!/usr/bin/env
+1
Skickat från min iPhone
18 jul 2014 kl. 17:58 skrev Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com:
On 07/18/2014 08:52 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 08:32:53AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
I think the OP is talking about executable scripts so both of
$ psql -f
Using PostgreSQL 9.3 on Linux Red-Hat platform.
Does PostgreSQL allow editable views?
Thanks in advance.
df
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Ferrell, Denise CTR NSWCDD, Z11 wrote
Using PostgreSQL 9.3 on Linux Red-Hat platform.
Does PostgreSQL allow editable views?
Please do not cross-post, even within these mailing lists. In almost all
cases it is sufficient to post to -general. And besides, this is not really
a server
I personally like Francisco Olarte's approach. Hashbang's don't support
arguments well (
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303128/how-to-use-multiple-arguments-with-a-shebang-i-e)
and being able to put JUST psql as the command to execute the script
doesn't scale across environments. Previously
Frank Pinto wrote
I personally like Francisco Olarte's approach. Hashbang's don't support
arguments well (
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303128/how-to-use-multiple-arguments-with-a-shebang-i-e)
and being able to put JUST psql as the command to execute the script
doesn't scale across
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ferrell, Denise CTR NSWCDD, Z11
denise.ferrell@navy.mil wrote:
Using PostgreSQL 9.3 on Linux Red-Hat platform.
Does PostgreSQL allow editable views?
Yes, it has automatically updatable views since 9.3, see [1].
You can also add a trigger or a rule to
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Francisco Olarte
fola...@peoplecall.com wrote:
Hi:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Andrew Pennebaker
andrew.penneba...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of a
file as a comment? This would enable .psql
Thank you for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Matheus de Oliveira [mailto:matioli.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:22 PM
To: Ferrell, Denise CTR NSWCDD, Z11
Cc: pgsql-ad...@postgresql.org; Forums postgresql
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Editable Views
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at
18 jul 2014 kl. 17:31 skrev Dennis Jenkins dennis.jenkins...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Pennebaker
andrew.penneba...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of a
file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to
As a workaround, I can use this shebang hack:
$ cat hello.psql
--() { :; }; exec psql -f $0
SELECT 'Hello World!';
$ ./hello.psql
?column?
--
Hello World!
(1 row)
$ psql -f hello.psql
?column?
--
Hello World!
(1 row)
But I would prefer to use a traditional
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:41:30AM -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
As an aside - putting an sql extension onto a file that uses psql commands
and features seems wrong...
Weeell, yeah, but, it can make life easier. Take Midnight
Commander for a start -- it recognizes *SQL files by their
.sql
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:51:35PM +0200, Francisco Olarte wrote:
Anyway, this is a little bit complex, as psql many times needs arguments.
Agreed.
Could we please have the PostgreSQL lexer treat #!... on the first line of a
file as a comment? This would enable .psql scripts to be run with
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Pennebaker
andrew.penneba...@gmail.com wrote:
As a workaround, I can use this shebang hack:
$ cat hello.psql
--() { :; }; exec psql -f $0
I hope that isn't patented! grin? Cause I'm gonna use it when I need to.
SELECT 'Hello World!';
$ ./hello.psql
David G Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
While I agree with the sentiment unless someone can present a reason why
allowing and then ignoring a she-bang is a terrible idea then this seems
like a case for letting end-users decide what is best for themselves. The
issue then is that
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David G Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
While I agree with the sentiment unless someone can present a reason why
allowing and then ignoring a she-bang is a terrible idea then this seems
like a case for letting
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It's not just that it's not high on anyone's priority list, it's that
we'd want to be sure that the patch didn't break any existing use-cases
or make things unmaintainable. (This
Hello,
What is the disk overhead for streaming replication? I have noticed that
PostgreSQL’s disk utilization goes up by 3x on the master when a slave is
connected. The setup only uses streaming replication, i.e. archive is off,
there is no archive command. I see with iotop that the wal writer
On 7/18/2014 4:44 PM, Joel Avni wrote:
Hello,
What is the disk overhead for streaming replication? I have noticed
that PostgreSQL’s disk utilization goes up by 3x on the master when a
slave is connected. The setup only uses streaming replication, i.e.
archive is off, there is no archive
Pls remove meee.
On 7/19/14, Ferrell, Denise CTR NSWCDD, Z11 denise.ferrell@navy.mil wrote:
Thank you for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Matheus de Oliveira [mailto:matioli.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:22 PM
To: Ferrell, Denise CTR NSWCDD, Z11
On 07/18/2014 05:39 PM, Thangavel D Duraisamy wrote:
Pls remove meee.
See bottom of this email for link to unsubscribe.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Sergey Konoplev-2 wrote
Hi,
PostgreSQL 9.2.7, Linux 2.6.32
Several days ago I found one of my servers out of connections,
pg_stat_activity showed that everything was waiting for the DROP/ALTER
INDEX transaction (see the record 2 below), that, as I guess, was
waiting for the function call
29 matches
Mail list logo
