>
> > 1. Is there any plans to add "non-strict mode" (configurable via options
> on
> > server/table/column level) to allow pushing down conditions for all data
> > types?
>
> No. You might as well call it a "return random answers" mode.
>
Its bad. I think most users would be happy to have "auto
Hi,
when i ran below statement its working fine..
select string_agg(part_id::text,':') from part;
But,
SELECT tab_to_largeStringcheck(cast(string_agg(part_id::text,':')as
t_varchar2_tab)) FROM part
[image: Inline image 1]
when i ran like
SELECT
qa.tab_to_largeStringcheck(string_agg(part_id
On 7/25/2014 5:58 PM, Prabhjot Sheena wrote:
We do have i/o problem during heavy loads because we share mount point
from netapp across different machines which we are getting rid in few
weeks by moving stuff to Amazon aws and than IO issues will go away
with fast iops
Netapp has to be some of
Thanks a lot Kevin. This is what i did to improve query performance. i
recreated all the indexes on work_unit table and have been running vacuum
analyze through cron job 3 times a day on two tables that are in the query.
The query performance is between 2 to 3 seconds now. The strange thing i
noti
This is probably an easy one for most sql users but I don't use it very often.
>
>
>
>We have a postgres database that was used for an application we no longer use.
> However, we would
>
>like to copy/dump the tables to files, text or csv so we can post them to
>sharepoint.
>
>
>
>Copy seems to b
>The presence of absence of the length limiter on a varchar will not impact
>the query plan. And I'm pretty sure you cannot even store a too long
>varchar in an index. It will error on the attempt (as opposed to
>truncating).
The max size is almost one block. After that you get an error:
FEHL
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> I found a interesting extension
> http://code.malloclabs.com/pg_schema_triggers
Ah, I remember that. I find that approach more cumbersome to use than
mine. Note the ALTER cases can't tell you much about exactly how the
relation has changed; you have to run compa
Bill Moran wrote
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:20:57 +0100
> Rebecca Clarke <
> r.clarke83@
> > wrote:
>
> Note that this is speculation on my part, but the
> point being that if those columns are usually as narrow as your
> examples you might want to try changing them to VARCHAR(50) or
> something a
Hello
I found a interesting extension
http://code.malloclabs.com/pg_schema_triggers
Regards
Pavel
2014-07-25 20:01 GMT+02:00 Alvaro Herrera :
> Vasudevan, Ramya wrote:
> > >> You could compare list of tables before (_start) and after (_end) the
> ddl. Doing it in plpgsql will be tricky, but i
Hi William:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:04 PM, William Nolf
wrote:
> We have a postgres database that was used for an application we no longer
> use. However, we wouldlike to copy/dump the tables to files, text or csv
> so we can post them to sharepoint.
>
How BIG is your public schema? A
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:20:57 +0100
Rebecca Clarke wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Here's the EXPLAIN output of a couple of the queries:
A few suggestions in addition to David's comment about doing
EXPLAIN ANALYZE:
1) When experimenting, one thing to try might be making a single
G
Vasudevan, Ramya wrote:
> >> You could compare list of tables before (_start) and after (_end) the ddl.
> >> Doing it in plpgsql will be tricky, but if you'd use some other language -
> >> like plperl - it's relatively simple:
> >> http://www.depesz.com/2013/12/18/waiting-for-9-4-plperl-add-eve
Rebecca Clarke-2 wrote
> Thanks for the reply. Here's the EXPLAIN output of a couple of the
> queries:
Typically you want to provide EXPLAIN ANALYZE output so that comparisons
between planner estimates and reality can be made.
David J.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045
>> Sure - just check differences in appropriate catalogs. pg_attribute,
>> pg_trigger, pg_proc.
>> In any way - if you want to really use it - you'll have to write in C.
Thank You Depesz. I think that answered my question.
Thank You
Ramya
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the reply. Here's the EXPLAIN output of a couple of the queries:
SELECT the_geom,oid from mytable
where the_geom && ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((529342.334095833
180696.22173,529342.334095833 181533.44595,530964.336820833
181533.44595,530964.336820833 180696.22173,529342
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Vasudevan, Ramya <
ramya.vasude...@classmates.com> wrote:
> >> You could compare list of tables before (_start) and after (_end) the
> ddl. Doing it in plpgsql will be tricky, but if you'd use some other
> language - like plperl - it's relatively simple:
> http://
16 matches
Mail list logo