Le 26/06/2015 03:26, Craig Ringer a écrit :
[...]
Sorry to bother again about that, but what about the detached node cleanup
best practice?
Suppose I have 2 nodes, 'node1' and 'node2'. So I am OK to call
bdr_part_by_node_names('node2') on node1 to detach node2. But then, is it
safe to call
Adrian,
Ok, let's start fresh.
app_security.validateSession() calls app_security.cleanSessionTable().
app_security.cleanSessionTable(), when called on its, own, does not
cause me any issues. It operates as designed.
I have added ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT to validateSession(), so that it now reads
Adrian,
what I want is quite simple, I want the function to work as intended. ;-)
Let's step through the function :
(1) perform app_security.cleanSessionTable(p_forcedTimeout,p_sessionTimeout);
Function calls cleanSessionTable.cleanSessionTable is simple. It
calls DELETE on the session
=?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=C5=82kowski?= filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any way to take use of indexes on foreign tables?
Currently (at least with tds_fdw, that I was testing) the planner just
does a dumb full sequential scan in all cases.
That would be something to discuss with
Tim Smith wrote on Friday, June 26, 2015 5:38 PM:
ERROR: cannot begin/end transactions in PL/pgSQL
HINT: Use a BEGIN block with an EXCEPTION clause instead.
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function
app_security.validatesession(app_domains.app_uuid,inet,text,bigint,bigint)
line 16 at SQL statement
Line
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski
filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Is there any way to take use of indexes on foreign tables?
Currently (at least with tds_fdw, that I was testing) the planner just
does a dumb full sequential scan in all cases.
That is
SELECT
On 06/26/2015 09:08 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Adrian,
what I want is quite simple, I want the function to work as intended. ;-)
Well that was my problem, I did not know what was intended.
Let's step through the function :
(1) perform
On 06/26/2015 08:38 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Adrian,
Ok, let's start fresh.
app_security.validateSession() calls app_security.cleanSessionTable().
app_security.cleanSessionTable(), when called on its, own, does not
cause me any issues. It operates as designed.
I have added ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Tim Smith randomdev4+postg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Adrian,
Ok, let's start fresh.
app_security.validateSession() calls app_security.cleanSessionTable().
app_security.cleanSessionTable(), when called on its, own, does not
cause me any issues. It operates as
You need to trap exceptions and in the handler block issue a
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-rollback-to.html
otherwise the the ROLLBACK issued at pg-session end will simply rollback
everything.
David J.
Thanks, will take a look.
--
Sent via
On 06/26/2015 07:24 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
So this is in a plpgsql function?
It is yes, but I thought I would spare you a copy/paste of the entire thing.
The error trapping section currently looks like this :
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
On 06/26/2015 06:38 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hi,
Apologies if I am being incredibly stupid, but I just can't seem to
get this to work for me.
I have a function that validates a web session is still active, so my
code looks something like this :
BEGIN
perform
Hi David,
I should have perhaps made clear this was a saved function, so my
understanding is ROLLBACK can't be used as its implicit.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tim Smith randomdev4+postg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a function that validates a web session is still active, so my
code looks something like this :
BEGIN
perform app_security.cleanSessionTable(p_forcedTimeout,p_sessionTimeout);
SAVEPOINT
So this is in a plpgsql function?
It is yes, but I thought I would spare you a copy/paste of the entire thing.
The error trapping section currently looks like this :
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE EXCEPTION 'Failed to validate
session
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Tim Smith randomdev4+postg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi David,
I should have perhaps made clear this was a saved function, so my
understanding is ROLLBACK can't be used as its implicit.
I am pretty certain ROLLBACK cannot be used but the ROLLBACK TO
SAVEPOINT
On 06/26/2015 09:54 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Well that was my problem, I did not know what was intended.
apt-get install mind-reading ;-)
1) Look before you leap
I'm confused by this option ?
My script reads as follows :
perform
On 06/26/2015 10:49 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Did not see the strict. In any case I thought cleanSessionTable was cleaning
out app_security.app_sessions not app_security.app_val_session_vw.
Yes. cleanSessionTable does the actual cleaning.
The point of the select from
On 06/26/2015 10:02 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Me again, I've reworded it, but its still rolling back !!!
Using the code below, if I call :
select app_security.validateSession('XYZ','10.10.123.43','Z',5,5);
I get an error raised on the select that follows cleanSessionTable.
Which is fine.
BUT,
Did not see the strict. In any case I thought cleanSessionTable was cleaning
out app_security.app_sessions not app_security.app_val_session_vw.
Yes. cleanSessionTable does the actual cleaning.
The point of the select from app_security.app_val_session_vw is that
if the session is valid, the
Me again, I've reworded it, but its still rolling back !!!
Using the code below, if I call :
select app_security.validateSession('XYZ','10.10.123.43','Z',5,5);
I get an error raised on the select that follows cleanSessionTable.
Which is fine.
BUT, Postgresql is still rolling back !
If I go back
On 06/25/2015 08:23 PM, litu16 wrote:
Hi Adrian,
but I would like to get the time diff in this format
0years 0months 0days 00:00:00.000
not only hours, minutes, seconds.
is this possible???
Well age:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/functions-datetime.html
does that sort
Hi Adrian,
but I would like to get the time diff in this format
0years 0months 0days 00:00:00.000
not only hours, minutes, seconds.
is this possible???
Thanks Advanced.
--
View this message in context:
娄帅 louis.hust...@gmail.com wrote:
I start two session with the following execute time order:
session1: START TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
session2: INSERT INTO t1 values(1);
session2: COMMIT;
session1: SELECT * FROM t1;
I found session1 got the value 1 which is inserted by
Hi.
Is there any way to take use of indexes on foreign tables?
Currently (at least with tds_fdw, that I was testing) the planner just
does a dumb full sequential scan in all cases.
That is
SELECT drink FROM foreignbar;
-- takes as much time as
SELECT drink FROM foreignbar where drink_key =
Well that was my problem, I did not know what was intended.
apt-get install mind-reading ;-)
1) Look before you leap
I'm confused by this option ?
My script reads as follows :
perform app_security.cleanSessionTable(p_forcedTimeout,p_sessionTimeout);
select * into strict v_row from
I knew I was missing something:(
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING
When an error is caught by an EXCEPTION clause, the local variables of the
PL/pgSQL function remain as they were when the error occurred, but all
changes
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski
filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is WHERE clause push-down implemented in any known fdw?
Google: postgresql fdw where clause push down
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SQL/MED#Open_questions
postgresql_fdw
Is WHERE clause push-down implemented in any known fdw?
Thank you.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=C5=82kowski?= filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any way to take use of indexes on foreign tables?
Currently (at least
I know how to convert a text to timestamp in postgreSQL using
*SELECT to_timestamp('05 Dec 2000', 'DD Mon ')*
but how can I convert a text variable (inside a function) to timestamp??
In my table (table_ebscb_spa_log04) time is a character varying column, in
which I have placed a
Hi folks,
I'm confused about the usage of CONSTRAINT TRIGGER. More specifically, the
documentation says that the name of another table referenced by the
constraint can be specified in a FROM clause:
The (possibly schema-qualified) name of another table referenced by the
constraint. This option
On Friday, June 26, 2015, litu16 litumelen...@gmail.com wrote:
I know how to convert a text to timestamp in postgreSQL using
*SELECT to_timestamp('05 Dec 2000', 'DD Mon ')*
but how can I convert a text variable (inside a function) to timestamp??
Generally, just try casting it.
On Friday, June 26, 2015, ZM Yang zmp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm confused about the usage of CONSTRAINT TRIGGER. More specifically, the
documentation says that the name of another table referenced by the
constraint can be specified in a FROM clause:
The (possibly schema-qualified)
Hi,
(Maybe my subject line should be: `is not distinct from` and indexes.)
In Postgres 9.4, I’ve got a table of ‘items’ that references a table ‘colors’.
Not all items have colors, so I created a nullable column in items like:
color_id bigint references colors
There is also an index
On 06/26/2015 11:41 AM, litu16 wrote:
I know how to convert a text to timestamp in postgreSQL using
*SELECT to_timestamp('05 Dec 2000', 'DD Mon ')*
but how can I convert a text variable (inside a function) to timestamp??
In my table (table_ebscb_spa_log04) time is a character varying
On June 26, 2015 11:59:05 PM Robert Nikander wrote:
Hi,
(Maybe my subject line should be: `is not distinct from` and indexes.)
In Postgres 9.4, I’ve got a table of ‘items’ that references a table
‘colors’. Not all items have colors, so I created a nullable column in
items like:
On Friday, June 26, 2015, Robert Nikander rob.nikan...@gmail.com wrote:
So… is this bad DB design to use null to mean that an item has no color?
Should I instead put a special row in `colors`, maybe with id = 0, to
represent the “no color” value? Or is there some way to make an index work
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Robert Nikander rob.nikan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
(Maybe my subject line should be: `is not distinct from` and indexes.)
In Postgres 9.4, I’ve got a table of ‘items’ that references a table
‘colors’. Not all items have colors, so I created a nullable
Hi,
Apologies if I am being incredibly stupid, but I just can't seem to
get this to work for me.
I have a function that validates a web session is still active, so my
code looks something like this :
BEGIN
perform app_security.cleanSessionTable(p_forcedTimeout,p_sessionTimeout);
SAVEPOINT
39 matches
Mail list logo
