There are no differences between the 2 servers that I can imagine would stop
this install. Both were sucessfully running PostgrSQL 9.4.5 prior to the
update.
The /data directory is not even being created. After uninstalling there is
no /PostgreSQL subdirectory under C:/Program Files/. The installe
On 1/10/16 3:44 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
It might be about time to come up with an extension that's a replacement
for large objects.
What would it take to fund such an extension?
Time and/or money.
It would "have to" support:
- Migrate existing LOs away from pg_largeobject
-
On 19 January 2016 at 11:44, dinesh kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:37 PM, drum.lu...@gmail.com <
> drum.lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've created a function that allows me to do an huge update.
>>
>> But I need to limit this function. I need to do 50k rows (example) and
>> th
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:37 PM, drum.lu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I've created a function that allows me to do an huge update.
>
> But I need to limit this function. I need to do 50k rows (example) and
> then stop it. After that I need to continue from the rows that I've
> stopped... I'll ha
>
> It is customary to restrict emails to a single list or at least make
> others aware when you do have a legitmate need to cross-post.
>
> Specifically your post on -admin <“Break” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL
> 9.2>
>
> Yes, it didn't belong on -admin in the first place but posting it here
>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:37 PM, drum.lu...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I've created a function that allows me to do an huge update.
>
> But I need to limit this function. I need to do 50k rows (example) and
> then stop it. After that I need to continue from the rows that I've
> stopped... I'll have to mo
I've created a function that allows me to do an huge update.
But I need to limit this function. I need to do 50k rows (example) and then
stop it. After that I need to continue from the rows that I've stopped...
I'll have to modify the call function *select batch_number()* as well.
How can I do th
On 18/01/2016 19:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 10:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
>>> pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment w
On 01/18/2016 10:38 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:02:33AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
O.k. so I let every thing sit with V7 for several days and we have received
no further feedback. I believe we have reached a point where we can
reasonably consider this Final or at le
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:02:33AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> O.k. so I let every thing sit with V7 for several days and we have received
> no further feedback. I believe we have reached a point where we can
> reasonably consider this Final or at least Final Draft.
While the verbiage seems O
On 01/18/2016 10:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
* Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
tolerated.
Personally, I was comfortable with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> This final draft incorporates all reasonable feedback I have received as
> well as rewriting it in a more conversational tone from Kevin Grittner's
> efforts.
Looks great to me. Thanks for all your efforts in this.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
> * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
> pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
> tolerated.
Personally, I was comfortable with the rest of it, but this one
made me squirm
Hello,
O.k. so I let every thing sit with V7 for several days and we have
received no further feedback. I believe we have reached a point where we
can reasonably consider this Final or at least Final Draft.
This final draft incorporates all reasonable feedback I have received as
well as rewr
On 01/18/2016 07:40 AM, DerekW wrote:
I am running Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 and upgrading from 9.4.5 to 9.5.
I was unable to get pg_upgrade to work so my upgrade path is: 1) Backup
with pg_dumpall 2) Uninstall 9.4 3) Install 9.5 4) Restore data This
worked sucessfully on one server. I am now ha
I am running Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 and upgrading from 9.4.5 to 9.5. I
was unable to get pg_upgrade to work so my upgrade path is:1) Backup with
pg_dumpall2) Uninstall 9.43) Install 9.54) Restore dataThis worked
sucessfully on one server. I am now having issues following the same
procedure on a
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 06:26 +, Kaliappa, Karthic wrote:
> We are looking to upgrade our application from postgres 9.4 to 9.5,
> but we are unable to find the RPM named 'pg_catcheck-95' for RHEL (ht
> tp://yum.postgresql.org/9.5/redhat/rhel-6-x86_64/).
> Whereas it is available for Fedora,
What is the best practice to make sure the DDL operation will
fail, possibly after a timeout, if one of the node is down?
statement_timeout
Ok. Thank-you for pointing this. I have just tried it, and this work
great even for nodes that are not properly power off (plug removed).
18 matches
Mail list logo
