On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Silk Parrot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying build a multi tenant application and are debating which
> approach we should take: (also my understanding is based on that pgbouncer
> connection pool doesn’t work across different user/database pair):
>
> 1. For each
Branden Visser writes:
> I just wanted to update that I've found evidence that fixing the
> planner row estimation may not actually influence it to use the more
> performant merge join instead of hash join. I have found instances
> where the row estimation is *overestimated* by a magnitude of 4x
>
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:32 PM, John McKown
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Kregloh
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is there a way to force the user being sent to LDAP?
>> >
>> > For example I have the following entry in my pg
John McKown writes:
>âPerhaps what is necessary is something akin to the UNIX "sudo" facility.
> That is, an SQL statement prefix which, if used, runs the given SQL
> statement as a PG superuser. You then GRANT(?) authority to that facility
> like you would to a table or database or ... . E.g. G
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Kregloh
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way to force the user being sent to LDAP?
> >
> > For example I have the following entry in my pg_hba.conf file:
> > hostapdb apuser 10.0.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Kregloh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to force the user being sent to LDAP?
>
> For example I have the following entry in my pg_hba.conf file:
> hostapdb apuser 10.0.20.1/22 ldap
> ldapserver="389-ds1.sl.com:389" ldapbasedn=
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:54:00AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > Uh, that is only true if the slowness was in _dumping_ many objects.
> > Most of the fixes have been for _restoring_ many objects, and that is
> > done in the new cluster, so they should be OK.
>
> There have been improvements on both
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:35:23AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> > On 7/27/2016 9:39 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> >>
>> >> That depends on how how many objects there are consuming that 1 TB.
Hi,
Is there a way to force the user being sent to LDAP?
For example I have the following entry in my pg_hba.conf file:
hostapdb apuser 10.0.20.1/22 ldap
ldapserver="389-ds1.sl.com:389" ldapbasedn="dc=sl,dc=com"
- I will be connecting as apuser.
- I will supply my
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:48:57PM -0400, Rakesh Kumar wrote:
> Can an existing stored procedure be modified online while other users
> are executing it. In Oracle, the session doing CREATE OR REPLACE
> PACKAGE would wait for other session to complete. Once the package is
> changed, first time oth
Can an existing stored procedure be modified online while other users
are executing it. In Oracle, the session doing CREATE OR REPLACE
PACKAGE would wait for other session to complete. Once the package is
changed, first time other sessions will get an error "package
invalidated". How is it in PG.
I have a data-set with
- a line number
- a name
- a value
I want to select the rows in line number order, but I want to consolidate
consecutive rows into a single row, concatenating the names, if the value
is null.
For example, here's my data:
values (
(1, 'a', 1),
(2, 'b', 2),
(3, 'c', null),
(
Hi,
We are trying build a multi tenant application and are debating which
approach we should take: (also my understanding is based on that pgbouncer
connection pool doesn’t work across different user/database pair):
1. For each tenant, we create a dedicated database and a dedicated user. Thi
Patrick B wrote:
> This has been resolved.
How?
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http:/
I just wanted to update that I've found evidence that fixing the
planner row estimation may not actually influence it to use the more
performant merge join instead of hash join. I have found instances
where the row estimation is *overestimated* by a magnitude of 4x
(estimates 2.4m rows) and still c
Il 29/07/2016 15:30, David G. Johnston
ha scritto:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at
7:08 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
R
Hello
On 08/01/2016 12:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Edson Richter writes:
From: t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Uh, doesn't the CONTEXT field of error messages give you that already?
Would you give me an example where I can get the info you mention above? Do I
need to enable some kind of parameter to get thi
17 matches
Mail list logo