b...@byeh.net writes:
> Is this supposed to happen given the queries above? Why? Is there some
> sort of interaction happening between the missing DISTINCT ON ORDER BY
> and the window ORDER BY? is this a bug?
Yes, your query is underspecified, yes, no.
The PG SELECT reference page explains corre
On 01/27/2017 05:40 PM, Brian Mills wrote:
First of all, Thank you for your time to assist me learning. I really
appreciate it.
root# ps ax | grep post
1364 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/lib/postfix/master
5198 pts/3S 0:00 su postgres
5221 pts/3S 0:00 /usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin
I am having an issue where the subquery version of a query and the CTE
version of a query are generating different results.
Postgresql version 9.5.5 on Linux Ubuntu 14.04.
Table definition:
Table "dealerinventorychange"
Column | Type |
Modifiers
---+
First of all, Thank you for your time to assist me learning. I really
appreciate it.
root# ps ax | grep post
1364 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/lib/postfix/master
5198 pts/3S 0:00 su postgres
5221 pts/3S 0:00 /usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin/postgres -D
/etc/postgresql/9.3/main
5222 ?
On 01/27/2017 01:31 PM, Brian Mills wrote:
Hi,
I have a Atlassian Confluence Wiki that depends on postgres, but I
haven't much experience with postgres other than for this purpose.
A few days ago, the hard disk filled, so all services stopped working.
When the admin realised this he increased t
Hi,
I have a Atlassian Confluence Wiki that depends on postgres, but I haven't
much experience with postgres other than for this purpose.
A few days ago, the hard disk filled, so all services stopped working.
When the admin realised this he increased the disk size (its in a cloud, so
that was eas
Hello everyone,
In my application I am using this logical replication decoder:
https://github.com/xstevens/decoderbufs
A year ago I had a problem with some values being nil due to not
implemented decoding of EXTERNAL ONDISK values. I managed to hotfix it, it
kind of work until now.
Could someon
John R Pierce writes:
> On 1/16/2017 11:27 AM, Patrick B wrote:
>> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON note (timezone('Etc/UTC'::text, d_date));
> why did you prefix your index with timezone('etc/UTC'::text ??? that
> doesn't make sense to me at all. is timezone() some function you've
> defined? I'
On 1/16/2017 11:27 AM, Patrick B wrote:
Sorry about that.. just wanted to understand how to index a timestamp
column. I was able to do this way:
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON note (timezone('Etc/UTC'::text, d_date));
why did you prefix your index with timezone('etc/UTC'::text ??? that
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Patrick B wrote:
>
>
> 2017-01-12 16:48 GMT+13:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh :
>
>> På torsdag 12. januar 2017 kl. 03:15:59, skrev Patrick B <
>> patrickbake...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've got a slow query, running at 25 seconds.
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Rakesh Kumar
wrote:
> Ver 9.6.1
>
> In a streaming replication can it be assumed that if both primary and
> standby are of the same hardware, then the rate at which transactions are
> applied on the standby will be same as that on primary. Or standbys are
> always
11 matches
Mail list logo