Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> >
> > The PostgreSQL cannot to push join - in slow case, the UNIONS should be done
> > first - and it requires full scan ar_tran_inv - used filter (posted AND
> > (deleted_id = 0) is not too effective - maybe some comp
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2017-09-14 15:09 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule :
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-14 14:59 GMT+02:00 Frank Millman :
>>>
>>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> 2017-09-14 10:14 GMT+02:00 Frank Millman :
Hi all
This is a follow-up to a recent quest
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's desired behavior, exactly, but there's no very
>> good way to improve it. pg_ctl has no visibility into what the postmaster
>> is thinking.
> The function signature (and docs) for pg_reload_co
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> jotpe writes:
> > A system administration applied an invalid line into the pg_hba.conf
> > file and called "service postgresql reload". Since that command doesn't
> > return any error and leaves with exit code 0 it seams that new
> > configurat
W dniu 18.09.2017 o 17:26, Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais pisze:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:15:46 +0200
> Rafal Pietrak wrote:
>
>> W dniu 16.09.2017 o 09:33, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais pisze:
[-]
>
> About FK, just look at pgsql trigger code around real FK and adjust to your
jotpe writes:
> A system administration applied an invalid line into the pg_hba.conf
> file and called "service postgresql reload". Since that command doesn't
> return any error and leaves with exit code 0 it seams that new
> configuration was applied.
> Of course postgresql added a warning to
A system administration applied an invalid line into the pg_hba.conf
file and called "service postgresql reload". Since that command doesn't
return any error and leaves with exit code 0 it seams that new
configuration was applied.
Of course postgresql added a warning to the log file: "pg_hba.c
Sorry I'm asking this question to the list, but the Devart's
documentation is very sparse.
I would like to call pg_try_advisory_lock( bigint ) and corresponding
pg_advisory_unlock( bigint ) from my DAL library.
Does someone use this ORM, and call server functions using it? How is it
done, an
On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:15:46 +0200
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> W dniu 16.09.2017 o 09:33, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais pisze:
> >
> [-]
> >
> > I wrote something about this some years ago, this might do the trick for
> > you, maybe with some adjustments depending on your schema. The mai
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 08:17 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I don't have any specific suggestion for an additional column, other than
> Berend's idea. However, I strongly advise against the use
> of ENUM's. They can create a major problem in t
On 09/18/2017 08:17 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
[snip]
I don't have any specific suggestion for an additional column, other than
Berend's idea. However, I strongly advise against the use
of ENUM's. They can create a major problem in the event one needs to be
removed.
Because it will internally
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Berend Tober wrote:
> Alexander Farber wrote:
>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> In a word game I store all player moves in the table:
>>
>> CREATE TYPE words_action AS ENUM (
>> 'play',
>> 'skip',
>> 'swap',
>> 'resign',
>> 'ban',
>>
Alexander Farber wrote:
Good evening,
In a word game I store all player moves in the table:
CREATE TYPE words_action AS ENUM (
'play',
'skip',
'swap',
'resign',
'ban',
'expire'
);
CREATE TABLE words_moves (
mid BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:36 PM, James Sewell wrote:
> When Iook at timeline 15 I see this:
>
> 20 C74/4500no recovery target specified+
This refers to timeline 20. Are there other entries in this history
file? Isn't timeline 15 a direct parent of timeline 20?
> As 00150C730
Hi Craig,
So, is it safe to drop those list from this query output?
select riname from pg_replication_identifier where riname not in
(select external_id from pg_replication_identifier_progress);
I cannot read pg_get_replication_identifier_progress function, is it likely
c function?
On Fri, S
15 matches
Mail list logo
