Re: [GENERAL] Question About Serializable

2013-09-18 Thread Aaron Carlisle
No particular effort; I saw a talk on the topic. I said it's academic because I can't think of any real world example where this would matter (the other definition of the word "academic"). On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Aaron Carlisle wrote:

[GENERAL] Question About Serializable

2013-09-18 Thread Aaron Carlisle
The documentation states that "concurrent execution of a set of Serializable transactions is guaranteed to produce the same effect as running them one at a time in some order." I'm not sure how the following behavior fits that definition. (Note that this is just an experiment, not a use case. Pure