On 18/08/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, it's a work of a simplistic perlscript IIRC. It simply looked for
> the first match it could find, based on the list found in the registry
> (the whole concept is a bit of an ugly hack, but it's
Oh, you didn't say you were on Windows
I did, but it was buried in the first paragraph...
Magnus, did you have a specific reason for choosing Europe/Dublin,
or was it just alphabetically first? Europe/London looks at least
marginally closer to what one would think "GMT" means:
Does it have
On 28/07/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alistair Bayley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was puzzled as to why it is set to Dublin when my machine's Time
> Zone is GMT. I saw in the docs that in the absense of an entry in the
> .conf file or a
On 26/07/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alistair Bayley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first line of output puzzles me: why is '1916-10-01 02:25:20'
> 2627158159 seconds before 2000-01-01, while '1916-10-01 02:25:21' is
> 26271560
(forwarded from pgsql-interfaces because no response there; can
anybody tell me if I really have a bug, or am just a bit dim?)
Hello,
Below is a test C program, which fetches some timestamp literals and
prints their internal representation, which is the number of seconds
after 2000-01-01, stored
