On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I try to get columns from my database with a singel SELECT, but I stuck.
>
> I have 3 tables like:
>
>
> 1) categories (serial,cat)
>
> 2) manufacturers (serial,m_name)
>
> 3) products
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Max Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> We have a PostgreSQL database. There are 26 tables and we use serial type
> as primary key. We had a insert error as “duplicate key value violates
> unique constraint, DETAIL: Key (id)=(1) already exists.”
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amitabh Kant <amitabhk...@gmail.com> writes:
> > command: "/var/tmp/pgbin.SPOsRj4D/bin/pg_ctl" -w -l
> "pg_upgrade_server.log"
> > -D "/usr/local/p
Hi
I am trying to upgrade an exisitng Postgresql cluster from 9.1 to 9.5 on
FreeBSD. pg_upgrade fails with the following error:
[Verbose Output: http://pastebin.com/YhR8vD03]
==
$ /usr/local/bin/pg_upgrade -k -d /usr/local/pgsql/data91 -D
/usr/local/pgsql/data
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, ajmcello wrote:
> Reducing worker mem shaved about 12 minutes off the query time.. Thanks
> for the suggestion. I lowered it to 10MB instead of 100MB
>
> [SNIP]
>
> >>> [postgresql.conf]
> >>> max_connections = 10
> >>>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
> On 29/07/2016 21:06, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>> On 2016-07-29 12:59, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 07:49:36PM +0200, Maeldron T. wrote:
>>>
And yes, I hate upgrading PostgreSQL
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Amitabh Kant <amitabhk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Andreas .. I thought of going the replication way .. But having
> done a sample run couple of hours ago, it seems it will work out without
> making any changes . Will update this thread o
ndr...@a-kretschmer.de>
wrote:
> Read the doc about Replikation. I think you can simply set up the New
> machine AS streaming Replikation slave and promote it than AS master - with
> no downtime.
>
> Am 20. Dezember 2015 02:50:57 MEZ, schrieb Amitabh Kant <
> amitabhk...@gmail.com
&g
Hi
I have a Postgresql 9.1 instance running on FreeBSD 9.0 (64 bit). The
machine is now running out of space and no extra hard disk can be added to
the machine. I am planning to move the instance to another machine which is
running FreeBSD 10.2 (64 bit) with the same Postgresql version.
One idea
Hi
I need to upgrade a PG cluster from 9.1 to 9.4 running on dedicated FreeBSD
9.2 server. Earlier I followed the simple pg_dump / pg_restore, but now
that the cluster has grown to around 700 GB (1 TB total HD size), I am now
inclined towards using pg_upgrade.
pg_upgrade requires both binary to
/pgsql_94/data to /usr/local/pgsql/data
9. Copy any settings you want to restore and that's it.
Above is the basic steps as I remember from memory. But I've successfully
upgraded many databases this way.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I need
Hi
A development box hard disk failed which was running a PG instance with
multiple databases on it. I got the data recovered with some bad sector
errors. Ran another instance of PG (same version), and was to able to take
dump (using pg_dump) of all but one database. For one database I am
:
Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.com writes:
A development box hard disk failed which was running a PG instance with
multiple databases on it. I got the data recovered with some bad sector
errors. Ran another instance of PG (same version), and was to able to
take
dump (using pg_dump) of all
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.com writes:
As for running the sql command as suggested by Tom, here is the result:
template1=# select * from pg_class where pg_relation_filenode(oid) =
11678
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:33 AM, François Beausoleil franc...@teksol.infowrote:
Hi all!
Does PG perform that much better on FreeBSD? I have some performance
issues on a Ubuntu 12.04 which I'd like to resolve. iowait varies a lot,
between 5 and 50%. Does FreeBSD better schedule I/O, which
David
I just tried installing PG 9.2.2 on FreeBSD 8.3 and initdb went smoothly
without any problems. the only difference would be that I had it running in
a virtualbox instance. My config were as follows;
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p5 (binary updated through freebsd-update)
PG 9.2.2 (installed through
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, David Noel david.i.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you use ports to install postgresql?
Yes
What is the version of postgresql and freebsd you are using?
postgresql client and server v. 9.2.2. If all else fails I could try
downgrading to a previous version of
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/13/2012 08:18 AM, David Noel wrote:
On 12/13/12, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/2012 07:38 AM, David Noel wrote:
I'm running into the following error message when running initdb
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David Noel david.i.n...@gmail.com writes:
I've tried initdb directly:
initdb -D /zdb/pgsql/data
...and still seem to wind up with the error:
creating template1 database in /zdb/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL:
could not
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, David Noel david.i.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/12, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David Noel david.i.n...@gmail.com writes:
/zdb is a zfs volume I've created for cvs and postgres.
zfs eh? What happens if you point initdb at a non-zfs volume?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Vishalakshi Navaneethakrishnan
nvishalak...@sirahu.com wrote:
Hi Friends,
We have our production environment database server in Postgres 8.3
version. we have planned to upgrade to lastest version 9.1. Dump from 8.3
and restore in Postgres 9.1 takes more
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Andrew Barnham andrew.barn...@gmail.comwrote:
Scratch that. An immediate show stopping pitfall occurs to me: the
necessity to match CPU/OS Architecture between primary server and replicate
target. Doubtful that there are any consumer NAS products out there
I run the same config (FreeBSD 9 with PG 9.1.x) on couple of servers, and
they seem to be working fine without any error messages. The only other
setting I have in my sysctl.conf is kern.maxfiles .
Amitabh
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Carl von Clausewitz clausewit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I have the following table structure on Postgres 8.4 :
STRUCTURE: tblunit
unit_id [integer]
unit_location [character varying]
DATA:
1,'location1'
2,'location2'
3,'location3'
STRUCTURE: tbloperator
operator_id [integer]
operator_name [character varying]
DATA:
1,'operator1'
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Phoenix Kiula phoenix.ki...@gmail.comwrote:
snip
Another idea.
I use CSF/LFD firewall.
For TCP_IN, I have enabled 6432 port number.
Do I also need to enable it elsewhere, such as TCP_OUT or UDP_IN etc?
Could you just try disabling the firewall for once?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Phoenix Kiula phoenix.ki...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com
wrote:snip
[databases]
MYDB = host=127.0.0.1 dbname=MYDB user=MYUSER client_encoding=utf8
port=5432
;; Configuation section
[pgbouncer]
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 20.11.2011 04:21, Phoenix Kiula napsal(a):
snip
My guess is that you actually require a password when connecting to the
database, but you haven't specified a password in the pgbouncer.ini
file. You have to specify it in
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Phoenix Kiula phoenix.ki...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Phoenix Kiula phoenix.ki...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tomas Vondra t
Hello
I have a simple table 'location' :
id - Int (associated with a sequence)
name - Character varying (100)
I have to delete all records where values in name field are all in upper
case. For example, if the test data is as follows:
idname
1abcc
2Abc dsase
3CDF FDER
4
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
klep...@svana.orgwrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 03:12:44PM +0530, Amitabh Kant wrote:
Hello
I have a simple table 'location' :
id - Int (associated with a sequence)
name - Character varying (100)
I have to delete all records
There have been several discussions for SSD in recent months although not
specific to Fusion IO drives.
See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-04/msg00460.php . You
can search the archives for more such reference.
Amitabh
2011/8/11 Ondrej Ivanič ondrej.iva...@gmail.com
Hi,
Hi Siva
Not sure if it would help, but try passing -O in your pg_restore command.
Amitabh
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Siva Palanisamy siv...@hcl.com wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your reply. As usual Backup worked perfectly. When I tried
restore using the command you provided, I got
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Jeff Hamann jeff.d.ham...@gmail.comwrote:
snip
Please don't respond with Why don't you just use the ports collection?
There's reasons - like: 1) need to build from source, 3) it's for a
tutorial, and 3) postgresql90-server isn't building.
Respectfully,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Alexander Farber
alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Cedric and others,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/19 Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com:
[pgbouncer]
logfile =
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Chetan Suttraway
chetan.suttra...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello
If I have partitioned a table based on a foreign key in a manner where
every child table will only have data
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:52 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/26/11 10:01 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 26 Feb 2011, at 18:04, Amitabh Kant wrote:
Now if I partition the table T2 based on field T1id, making sure that
each distinct T1id is provided its own child table
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:30 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/26/11 10:42 AM, Amitabh Kant wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:52 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.commailto:
pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/26/11 10:01 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 26 Feb 2011
Hello
If I have partitioned a table based on a foreign key in a manner where every
child table will only have data for single value of the foreign key, do I
need to create a index for the foreign key in the primary and/or child
tables? I am using version 8.4
With regards
Amitabh
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:21 PM, tamanna madaan
tamanna.ma...@globallogic.com wrote:
Hi All
Any idea about this problem ??
Thanks..
Tamanna
-Original Message-
From: tamanna madaan
Sent: Fri 8/20/2010 11:54 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: error while
section
as he is running FreeBSD 7.0?
Amitabh Kant
://masivakumar.blogspot.com
pgtune [http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgtune/] is already available for
this purpose.
Amitabh Kant
/static/sql-vacuum.html
With regards
Amitabh Kant
Hello
I need to compare the bit values of a integer field in my table. For
example, I have a table called t1 with just one field a1 having
following values:
a1
==
0
12
8
0
1
10
7
19
I am trying to fetch all records where the 3rd binary bit is 1, which from
the above example should be 12
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:53 PM, A. Kretschmer
andreas.kretsch...@schollglas.com wrote:
In response to Amitabh Kant :
test=# select * from t1;
a1
0
12
8
0
1
10
7
19
(8 rows)
test=*# select a1 from t1 where (a12)::bit = B'1';
a1
12
7
(2 rows)
Regards
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, György Vilmos vilmos.gyo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
releases to see, how performance has changed during the past years from
version to version.
You can find the article here:
Just to add to this list, I have been using Postgresql to store data
for multiple GPS applications handling more than 150-200 vehicles.
Some of the tables that I have are running into 20 - 25 million rows
at the max, and on average 10 million rows. I am yet to see a problem
from the database side,
You would get better results if you posted in mysql forums.
http://forums.mysql.com/
Amitabh
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
47 matches
Mail list logo