e convenient to have datatypes for.
Being an open-source project I guess one must show initiative and start a
discussion on -hackers to see what interesst there's in having one in core. I
for one hope there will be.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 90
På tirsdag 14. november 2017 kl. 00:44:11, skrev Peter Geoghegan mailto:p...@bowt.ie>>:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> When sorting on text, we're usually doing so using an multi-column index,
like for instance "CREATE INDEX xxx ON my_tab
På mandag 13. november 2017 kl. 22:28:40, skrev Peter Geoghegan mailto:p...@bowt.ie>>:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> Thanks.
As the person that worked on abbreviated keys, I'd like to hear about
how you get with this. How much faster is it for
should be quite a bit of debug output from that that
specifically mentions abbreviated keys.
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
På mandag 13. november 2017 kl. 21:40:47, skrev Peter Geoghegan mailto:p...@bowt.ie>>:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> Ok, so I have to explicitly specify like this:
>
> create table test(id serial primary key, name varchar collate "nb_NO
På mandag 13. november 2017 kl. 19:07:53, skrev Peter Geoghegan mailto:p...@bowt.ie>>:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> In PG-10, with ICU enabled, is abbreviated keys now enabled?
Yes. ICU will use abbreviated keys on every platform, including Window
Hi.
In PG-10, with ICU enabled, is abbreviated keys now enabled?
If so, using locale=nb_NO.UTF-8, do I have to use a ICU-specific locale to
take advantage of abbreviated keys?
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:a
so did a few more databases using the same steps and they all appeared to
be smaller. Is that normal?
Yep.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
test=*#
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
where ctid not in (select ctid from keep);;
DELETE 2
test=*# select * from dubletten ;
c1 | c2 | c3
++
1 | 1 | 1
1 | 2 | 3
2 | 3 | 4
3 | 4 | 5
4 | 5 | 5
5 | 5 | 5
(6 Zeilen)
test=*#
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www
Hi.
There was a while ago a proposed patch for adding
$subject; https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/454/
Is this being worked on? Any progress in btree-support?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
On 15 August 2017 21:54:56 GMT+02:00, Daryl Stultz
wrote:
>
>>>We are using PostgreSQL 9.3.14 on a managed Amazon RDS with a
>
>
>>Are you using reindex concurrently? There was a bugfix in 9.3.16 (+-1,
>i'm not sure).
>
>Hi Andreas, not that I'm aware
On 15 August 2017 21:24:29 GMT+02:00, Daryl Stultz
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We are using PostgreSQL 9.3.14 on a managed Amazon RDS with a
>
Are you using reindex concurrently? There was a bugfix in 9.3.16 (+-1, i'm not
sure).
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQ
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
over.conf file ?
>
>Alex
I would suggest you repmgr, with this tool you can do "repmgr standby
switchover" to perform such tasks.
Regards, Andreas.
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
t update, nor can I
>run
>vacuum against it as its in recovery mode.
>
>So how do update the stats and how will it affect my queries ?
The standby is read only, vacuum runs on the master and replicated to the
standby. Analyse as well.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The Pos
t primary key, master_id int
references public.master_table);
CREATE TABLE
test=*# create table demo2.demo_table(id int primary key, master_id int
references public.master_table);
CREATE TABLE
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general ma
Am 21.07.2017 um 08:11 schrieb Nikhil:
Schema = tenant. So basically tenant level logging.
On 21-Jul-2017 11:21 AM, "Andreas Kretschmer" <mailto:andr...@a-kretschmer.de>> wrote:
On 21 July 2017 07:10:42 GMT+02:00, Nikhil mailto:nikhilsme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Am 21.07.2017 um 08:01 schrieb Michael Paquier:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
El 20/07/17 a las 16:57, Andreas Kretschmer escribió:
On 20 July 2017 21:46:09 GMT+02:00, "Leonardo M. Ramé"
wrote:
Hi, I wonder if archive_mode=on and archive_command par
r tenant?
Regards, Andreas.
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
n which can return the version of
>the server I'm running?
>
>
Select version();
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 20 July 2017 21:46:09 GMT+02:00, "Leonardo M. Ramé"
wrote:
>Hi, I wonder if archive_mode=on and archive_command parameters in
>postgresql.conf are really needed for streaming replication between two
>
>servers (master-slave).
>
>Regards,
No.
Andreas
--
anup job can know the difference between such an INSERT-entry
in origo_email_message_file_operation caused by ROLLBACK and and INSERT-entry
caused by an in-progress insertEmail() operation.
Does anyone have a robust mechanism for cleaning up files in such scenarios?
Thanks.
-- Andre
>together
>somehow? (partitioning, replication, ...)
With current versions you can set shared buffers to, for instance, 40% of ram,
no problem. Tune also the checkpointer.
Regards, Andreas.
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-
På søndag 25. juni 2017 kl. 23:02:32, skrev Adrian Klaver <
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>:
On 06/25/2017 01:34 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På søndag 25. juni 2017 kl. 17:04:02, skrev Adrian Klaver
> mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>:
nment
for developing PG-extentions, not linking Qt in from an extention.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
l Sapir
>Lucee Core Developer
>Lucee.org <http://lucee.org/>
Yeah, use the community version from postgresql.org ;-)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
ing with large objects and streaming to clients
(JDBC). The only solution (I've found) which doesn't explode in memory-usage is
using LOs (OIDs). Note that we're dealing with multi-gigabytes objects, which
need to be "transactional safe" (hence stored in the DB).
--
successfully using logical decoding, correct?
> > I wish PG in some future version will address these quirks so one can
operate on LOs more smoothly.
You're welcome to help...
Every time issues arise regarding LOs there seems to be little interest to
improve matters, and if it do
På torsdag 22. juni 2017 kl. 15:25:20, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com <mailto:ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com>>:
On 22/06/2017 13:38, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På torsdag 22. juni 2017 kl. 11:43:02, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.
På torsdag 22. juni 2017 kl. 11:43:02, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com <mailto:ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com>>:
On 22/06/2017 11:21, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
Hi.
1. Why should one prefer built-in logical replication in pg-10 to pglogical,
does it do anythi
pglogical replicate large objects? I
cannot find any notes about large-objects under "Limitations and
Restrictions":
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/pglogical-docs/
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <ma
>Just wondering if these RPMs are compiled with SSL enabled?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Regards
>Dylan
Yes, it is compiled with SSL.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
ut it.
>
>Try perhaps logical replication. That would save you the bandwidth for
>updating all the indexes at least. It might work for you.
Not only the traffic for indexes, for Vacuum too.
(and that can be a lot)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent
no. For
session-data please consider unlogged tables.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
recommendations?
as far as i know, at the moment only bitmap-index-scans would benefit
from higher values. You can try 16 or 32 as starting point.
(if you have a proper io-controller with cache)
(it has nothing to do with parallel execution of queries)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The
(dumps), but i would strongly advise
against to store the db there. PostgreSQL relys on the fsync, that's not
possible in this case. I'm sure, a total data disaster would not be a
question, only when it would happen.
Why not a PostgreSQL-database somewhere in the cloud?
Regard
e you made any progress making it work for btree?
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
date for an automation
tool like ansible, perhaps?)
use auth_query instead of auth_file.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Am 15.06.2017 um 08:26 schrieb Rory Campbell-Lange:
On 15/06/17, Andreas Kretschmer (andr...@a-kretschmer.de) wrote:
Am 15.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Martin Goodson:
...Do people setup pgbouncer nodes on the database servers
themselves, on application servers, in the middle tier between the
indow-function and for the
result-set. Use alwyas an explicit ORDER BY if you expect an ordered result.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
milar in this way:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=274bb2b3857cc987cfa21d14775cae9b0dababa5
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=721f7bd3cbccaf8c07cad2707826b83f84694832
)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Com
gt;chimera | t_inodes | |
>ShareUpdateExclusiveLock | t | enstore | autovacuum: VACUUM
>public.t_inodes (to prevent wraparound)| 2017-06-13
>12:31:04.870064-05 | 00:28:50.276437 | 40672
>
It is a autocacuum to prevent wraparound, you can't
Am 01.06.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Wetzel, Juergen (Juergen):
Am 31.05.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Wetzel, Juergen (Juergen):
Only 130 rows out of the 3 have ARCHIVED = 0
in this case i would suggest a partial index:
create index on (archived) where archived = 0;
Thanks, Andreas.
Sorry for the
Am 31.05.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Wetzel, Juergen (Juergen):
Only 130 rows out of the 3 have ARCHIVED = 0
in this case i would suggest a partial index:
create index on (archived) where archived = 0;
Thanks, Andreas.
Sorry for the confusion about the table names.
The hint with the partial
create index on (archived) where archived = 0;
You can also increase the statistics for the columns subject and mailContent
ALTERTABLEALTERCOLUMN SETSTATISTICS=1000;
(as example, the default-value is 100)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
Am 26.05.2017 um 14:07 schrieb doganmeh:
I tried varchar(12) also, nothing changed. My questions is 1) I have
672x12=8,064 characters in the first row (which are actually the headers),
why would it complain that it is 8760. I am assuming here type `text`
occupies 1 byte for a character.
plea
Not possible - yet.
Am 25. Mai 2017 13:48:59 MESZ schrieb Jayadevan M :
>Hi,
>
>I designed three tables so that one table inherits another, and the
>third
>table references the parent table. If a record is inserted into the
>third
>table and the value does exist in the parent table indirectly, bec
his indicates that the folder_id column, which is part of the index, isn't
actually "part of the index", meaning it's not used in the index for some
reason.
Can you tell me how to craft an index so that folder_id = ANY
('{44965,2470520}'::bigint[]) is part of t
ommand service_promote_command|
Keep me informed if that works, thx.
Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
ge-repo. Maybe you'll have more luck asking that other places than a
PG-mailing-list.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
of failure just to replace them back.
Is it doable? How?
What about just re-installing the previous version the same way you installed
the "patch-release"-version?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
olumns AS cols
where cols.table_schema =
'public' AND cols.table_name = 'abcatcol' ORDER BY
cols.ordinal_position ASC;
is this better?
Regards, Andreas Kretschme?
--
Andreas Kretschmer
http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Tr
.
You can use the overlap - operator:
test=*# select array[1,2,3,4] && array[1,4,5,7];
?column?
--
t
(1 Zeile)
test=*# select array[1,2,3,4] && array[10,40,50,70];
?column?
--
f
(1 Zeile)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www
> any special cases (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/
> sql-dropindex.html). This is with PostgreSQL 9.3.15.
>
> The actual command is:
>
> drop index if exists employer_employerid_key cascade;
>
> Any ideas if this is normal or why it happens?
Drop the co
1, c2, c3], 'asc'::text))=({1,2,3})«
existiert bereits.
test=*#
(sorry for german messages, it means error, dublicate entry ...)
Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
--
Andreas Kretschmer
http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via
ou can take care that there are no open
transactions running on the master, without data loss.
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/repmgr/blob/master/README.md
Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
--
Andreas Kretschmer
http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training &
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. März 2017 17:28
> An: Tom Lane
> Cc: Schmid Andreas; 'pgsql-general@postgresql.org'
> Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] createuser: How to specify a database to conn
Hi
I'm trying to add a new DB user with the following command from my client
machine:
createuser -h my.host.name -U mysuperusername --pwprompt newusername
I'm getting the following message:
createuser: could not connect to database postgres: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf
entry for host "10.0.0.1", use
Ping...
Any feedback is welcome, thanks.
På torsdag 12. januar 2017 kl. 13:13:34, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh <
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>>:
Hi PostgresPro-guys.
I've asked this before but didn't get any response, so I'll try again. I know
ou give an example with definition of index
and explain-plan?
It would be interesting to see how this performs vs. contrib/intarray.
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
Hello Ive been running into an issue with postgresql not hitting index on
select queries.
Below is the sql query I used to test my issue.
CREATE TABLE idxtbl (
id BIGINT,
aint BIGINT,
btime TIMESTAMPTZ,
ctext TEXT,
dbool BOOLEAN,
PRIMARY KEY(id)
);
--Inserted 10 mil random data
/* TEST TIMESTAMP
p often is't enough
because often there is some other dimention which is *very* relevant to limit
the results (like what folder, or account, to search for email-messages in,
instead of searching for all in the system).
Thanks.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +
ified);
Am I missing something?
Yes, you've not shown us:
1. The query
2. The schema
3. Complete EXPLAIN-output
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
På lørdag 07. januar 2017 kl. 18:25:42, skrev Tom Lane mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>:
Andreas Joseph Krogh writes:
> På lørdag 07. januar 2017 kl. 17:48:49, skrev Tom Lane <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>:
> If you've got just one problem query, it might be worth your ti
På lørdag 07. januar 2017 kl. 17:48:49, skrev Tom Lane mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>:
Andreas Joseph Krogh writes:
> I wonder; In general, is there any downside of having join_collapse_limit =
14
> on modern hardware (32 cores, 64GB RAM), and geqo_threshold=16 ?
> I'm aw
s and performance was acceptable again.
I wonder; In general, is there any downside of having join_collapse_limit = 14
on modern hardware (32 cores, 64GB RAM), and geqo_threshold=16 ?
I'm aware of it increasing planning-time, but is this really an issue in
practice?
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph
Kisung Kim wrote:
> And finally I found that auto_explain is the cause of the problem.
real hardware or virtual hardware? On virtual there are sometimes
problems with exact timings, please read:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/pgtesttiming.html
Regards, Andreas Kretsch
//www.jetbrains.com/datagrip/
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
ome/postgres/ [PG961] pg_restore -V
pg_restore (PostgreSQL) 9.6.1
postgres@pgbox:/home/postgres/ [PG961] pg_restore -h localhost -p 5439
-F d -C -j 2 /var/tmp/exp/
This runs fine but where does it connect to? Nothing is listening on
port 5439.
No, that can't run.
Andreas
På tirsdag 20. desember 2016 kl. 11:42:56, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com <mailto:ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com>>:
On 20/12/2016 12:27, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På tirsdag 20. desember 2016 kl. 11:02:27, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.
På tirsdag 20. desember 2016 kl. 11:02:27, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <
ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com <mailto:ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com>>:
On 20/12/2016 11:43, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
[snip]
BEGIN;
ALTER TABLE person ADD CONSTRAINT person_pk PRIMARY KEY (entity_id);
alter table
L
UNIQUE, name VARCHAR NOT NULL ); CREATE TABLE address ( id BIGINT PRIMARY KEY,
person_idBIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES person (id) ); CREATE TABLE phone ( id
BIGINT PRIMARY KEY, person_entity_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES person
(entity_id), numberVARCHAR NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO person (id, entity_
ry (!) update creates a new row-version and marks the old row as
'old', but don't delete the old row.
A Vacuum marks old rows as reuseable - if there is no runnung
transaction that can see the old row-version. That's how MVCC works in
PostgreSQL.
Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
-
but the 2016 Jaguar XF MPG gets 24 mpg.
-- Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
Samuel,
Please note that the accepted convention in this forum is to bottom post.
Please do not top post.
The accepted convention in this forum is to not have purple signature:-)
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
e problem with "no" seems to be the same.
One can always specify 'simple' as the config, eliminating any "stop-wprd
smartness":
andreak=> select to_tsquery('simple', 'a:*');
to_tsquery
'a':*
(1 row)
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
Am 23. November 2016 20:31:21 MEZ, schrieb John R Pierce :
>On 11/23/2016 11:20 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> How do I determine which those are? Just based on the timestamp if
>the
>> WAL file, such that I could do something like take the timestamp of
>> the last basebackup and delete all WAL
Is there any way to check whether the row already exists before checking
constraints ? I still want it to fail if it turns out to be a new row
(which would violate the not null constraint), but updates the row if it
already exists.
Since if that is not possible, I would need to do a query to deter
Hi,
Basically I wanted to do a partial update inside pg (9.5), but it seems
that a partial update fails when not all of constraint is fulfilled (such
as the not null constraint)
Below are the sql queries I used,
CREATE TABLE jobs (
id integer PRIMARY KEY,
employee_name TEXT NOT NULL,
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Merlin Moncure < mmonc...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Andreas Brandl < m...@andreas-brandl.de >
>> wrote:
>> You just posted the same question a few days ago -- were the answers
>> there uns
till on 9.1 unfortunately - upgrade is going to follow soon after this.
Thanks!
Andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
På tirsdag 15. november 2016 kl. 08:48:37, skrev Oleg Bartunov <
obartu...@gmail.com <mailto:obartu...@gmail.com>>:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: This item isn't valid, is it?
* There isn't phrase
search was introduced, this isn't really true, or am I
missing something?
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
AND folder_id = ANY(
ARRAY[2,3]::BIGINT[]) ORDER BY received_timestamp DESC LIMIT 10;
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
till on 9.1 unfortunately - upgrade is going to follow soon after this.
Thanks!
Andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
På onsdag 09. november 2016 kl. 15:54:13, skrev Adrian Klaver <
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>:
On 11/08/2016 06:45 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På onsdag 09. november 2016 kl. 03:02:54, skrev John R Pierce
> mailto:pie...@hogranch.com>
enance_work_mem is used by vacuum and create index operations
(including implicit index creation such as add foreign key).
There is no such thing in PG.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
+ dopt.outputBlobs = false;
+ break;
Then this IF sets it back to TRUE:
+ if (dopt.include_everything && !dopt.schemaOnly && !dopt.outputBlobs)
dopt.outputBlobs = true;
...making it impossible to turn off dumping of blobs.
-- Andr
is working.
Are there some plans to make dumping large tables (typically LOs) benefit from
parallelism?
Thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
t getting this in master is of
course the best.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
På søndag 23. oktober 2016 kl. 19:15:17, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh <
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>>:
På søndag 23. oktober 2016 kl. 17:06:57, skrev Guillaume Lelarge <
guilla...@lelarge.info <mailto:guilla...@lelarge.info>>:
2016-03-08 21:06 GMT+01
På søndag 23. oktober 2016 kl. 17:06:57, skrev Guillaume Lelarge <
guilla...@lelarge.info <mailto:guilla...@lelarge.info>>:
2016-03-08 21:06 GMT+01:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>>: På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 21:03:01, skrev
David G. Johnston mailto:david.g.
På tirsdag 18. oktober 2016 kl. 12:39:03, skrev Magnus Hagander <
mag...@hagander.net <mailto:mag...@hagander.net>>:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: På torsdag 13. oktober 2016 kl. 16:09:34,
skrev Bruce Momjian mailt
th --dry-run | grep your_table_name
Thanks to Julien, sqlsmith's master branch now has an option
--exclude-catalog that inhibits use of catalog relations. If you are
building from github, you might want to give it another chance with this
option. I'll probably do a proper release in next tw
På torsdag 13. oktober 2016 kl. 16:09:34, skrev Bruce Momjian mailto:br...@momjian.us>>:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> I would assume that having pg_largeobject in a separate tablespace is more
and
> more common these days, having real-
velopment of pg_upgrade to cope with this
configuration or somehow motivate to getting this issue fixed?
Would any of the PG-companies (2ndQ, EDB, PgPro) take a stab at this?
Any feedback welcome, thanks.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
fy the problematic queries ( for instance using
pg_stat_statements) and send this to the team behind odoo.
Andreas.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes
037990/connecting-to-postgres-via-database-url-and-unix-socket-in-rails)
Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
--
Andreas Kretschmer
http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@post
On 27 September 2016 01:52:26 CEST, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>Any ideas why pg_xlog is going so high?
archive_command failed? If that happens the wal's will not deleted, you should
see error-messages in the log.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
It is binary compatible, so yes. But trust me, there is problem with the new
version.
On 20 September 2016 06:00:59 CEST, KGA Official wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but our
>change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data
>preservat
1 - 100 of 1080 matches
Mail list logo