pg_start_backup will flush old transactions, thus you have full DB backup.
Unless you want them archived, no need to keep them
Regards,
Bohdan
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Joey K. wrote:
During week 2, after the base backup, can we remove week 1's base and WAL
files?
--
Sent
Hello,
I am fiddling around with pgpool-II and online recovery. Recovery depends
on remote starting of a cluster. This means I need to ssh into a box,
start clustern (with PITR recovery) and terminate that ssh connection.
If I use the following script:
ssh -T remote export
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Bohdan Linda wrote:
/opt/postgres-8.3.3/bin/psql -h remote -p postgres
psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
I am attaching additional info. The /dev/null is understable, but what I
am worried is that if I query status of a server via
Hello,
If you just want to ship segments to a standby server on a timely basis,
the setting to tune should be archive_timeout, no?
just curious, how would the stand-by DB process the segments?
Regards,
Bohdan
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
I have done some research recently and found on acceptable:
- DBdesigner4, which is depreceated and replaced by MySQL workbench. Is
OSS, but no linux version yet. Also has clunky pgsql support
- Aqua data studio (www.aquafold.com). It's java app which I am using for
some time already.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
8.0 is incapable of reordering outer joins, which is likely the cause of
your problem.
Thank you, will try.
Bohdan
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Hello,
I have noted one very strange thing which I would like to discuss with
you. I have noted that outer joins on nested views takes heavily longer
than the inner ones. Example:
REATE VIEW ports_view AS
SELECT
ports.pid,
nodes.nname
FROM
ports JOIN nodes ON nodes.nid =
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:38:09PM +0200, Scott Marlowe wrote:
OK. Assuming that the 50G is mostly dead space, there are a few
possibilities that could be biting you here, but the most likely one
is that your Free Space Map settings aren't high enough to include all
the rows that have been
Hello,
I would like to ask an opinion on vacuuming general. Imagine situation
that you have single table with 5 fields (one varchar). This table has
during the day
- cca 620 000 inserts
- 0 updates
- cca 620 000 deletes
The table is vacuumed daily, but somehow after several months I got to
size
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Harald Armin Massa wrote:
do not vacuum DAILY. set up autovacuum to run AT LEAST every minute.
autovacuum will flag the deleted rows as to be reusable by next
insert. Make sure to use 8.3.latest, it's much more easy to setup
autovacuum then before.
Hello,
I have the following problem. A multiuser app has authentization and
authorization done based on pgsql.
The frontend is web based so it is stateless; it is connecting to database
on every get/post. There is also a requirement that the user is
transparently logged in for some period of
Hello,
thank you everyone for the answers. I went through and I forgot add one
thing. The web-app is frontend, thus basically PL/PGSQL launcher and all
changes are audited, so common login is unwelcome.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:40:49PM +0200, Steve Manes wrote:
I keep the user's login
Hello,
Can the PGSQL database be configured that it performs authentication
against PAM and if fails the it tries against internal mechanizm?
I would like to migrate to PAM, but I do not want to promote some users to
system wide.
Till now I am able to do one or the other way.
Thank you,
Bohdan
Hello,
I am restricted to 8.0.7 version of postgresql and I am facing two problems
when trying to build generic auditing function. I went through documentation
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/plpgsql-trigger.html
example:
Example 35-3. A PL/pgSQL Trigger Procedure For Auditing
Hello,
with help of Bricklen, I have found that the problem is the scope of call
EXECUTE. When this is called it seems to be launched outside of the trigger's
scope and OLD/NEW is not defined. (Manual suggests it)
The remaining question is how to compare OLD.* and NEW.* in generic way for
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:21:32PM +0200, Chander Ganesan wrote:
I think you'll typically find that you can get one or the other -
synchronous replication, or load balancing...but not both. On the other
Hi,
I am in very similar position, but I am more failover oriented. I am
considering
Hello,
I am sorry for this little offtopic, but recently I was looking for some
matured DB frontend. I am licensed user of Aquafold Datastudio and before
I will start to spend another money for next licenses, I would like to ask
you if there are some similar frontends out there, but with three
Hello all,
I would like to use password authentication for pgsql users for remote
backup purposes. I don't like the fact storing cleartext password on a
system. From documentation, i have learnt that passwords can be encrypted
by md5 and crypt methods.
But we know, that md5 is rather weak
Thank you for the explanation.
Cheers,
Bohdan
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:57:32AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
This is the bit that's been bugging me this whole thread. Who owns the
data? I've had to help people out with programs where they could type
data in but couldn't get the reports they wanted out. Furtunatly,
Access's access
Hello,
may I ask, how(or which) ip is checked against pg_hba.conf IP entry in NAT
environment?
Could it be, that psql client packs IP address of the client into athentication
data?
Regards,
Bohdan
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget
No. Why? Describe your problem.
I have got response like bellow, when connecting to server in completely
different network than 172.x.x.x
--
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection rejected: FATAL: no
pg_hba.conf entry for host 172.x.x.x, user XxXxXx, database
yYyYyY, SSL off
Hi,
I started thinking of some security access management. Basically imagine
this scenario according users:
1) Writer does only inserts to black hole.
2) Reader does only reports on inserted data, cannot modify or add
anything
3) Maintainer can run a task on the data, but cannot read or
Hello,
I have read that 7.x version had a model all or nothing in transactions.
Thus I have upgraded to version 8 and would like to do the following:
plpgsq code does time intensive data manipulation + database vacuuming.
This data manipulation is splitted logically into several steps. After
Tanks guys,
That was exactly what I was looking for.
B.
---BeginMessage---
On 8/9/05 11:08 am, Bohdan Linda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I started thinking of some security access management. Basically imagine
this scenario according users:
1) Writer does only inserts to black hole
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:53:47PM +0200, Michael Fuhr wrote:
One way would be to use contrib/dblink to open another connection
to the database so the status messages could be inserted in a
separate transaction.
This could do the trick for logging, even writting of a package that would
do all
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:39:50PM +0200, Bohdan Linda wrote:
commit it now. You have to do some extra bookkeeping and you can't
commit several prepared transactions atomically (as far as I know),
but that's one way you could make
Hello,
I have encountered on (for me) wierd thing. When dropping an user, the
database will not forget his permissions. After his recreation he has the
original permissions.
I use an approach of dropping all users when recreating the database
environment and user recreation to avoid any
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:07:24PM +0200, Michael Fuhr wrote:
tables, and a VACUUM might start or complete immediately after you
issue the query but before you read the results). This method is
therefore unreliable.
I intend to do the VACUUM FULL during quiet hours, thus the chance of
fitting
From the postgresql manual
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/maintenance.html :
The standard form of VACUUM is best used with the goal of maintaining
a fairly level steady-state usage of disk space. If you need to return
disk space to the operating system you can use VACUUM
Hello,
Is there any way how to detect running command VACUUM by reading pg_* tables?
The idea is to detectect when table is not accessible due maintainance. The
approach of explicitely setting a flag into status table is not very
convenient, while I want to cover also non-systematic
I would have a slight offtopic question, this is issue only of pgsql or
there are some other db solutions which have good performance when doing
this kind of replication across the world.
Regards,
Bohdan
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:01:49AM +0200, William Yu wrote:
It provides pseudo relief if
32 matches
Mail list logo
