On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:55 -0500, Bryan Murphy wrote:
I'm having a problem upgrading a cluster from 9.0.7 to 9.1.3. Here's
the error:
Please send /srv/pg_upgrade_dump_globals.sql
Also, can you restart the old system
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:55 -0500, Bryan Murphy wrote:
I'm having a problem upgrading a cluster from 9.0.7 to 9.1.3. Here's
the error:
Please
I'm having a problem upgrading a cluster from 9.0.7 to 9.1.3. Here's the
error:
psql:/srv/pg_upgrade_dump_globals.sql:54: ERROR: duplicate key value
violates unique constraint pg_authid_oid_index
DETAIL: Key (oid)=(10) already exists.
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Here's the verbose output
Last night we were hit by the out of memory killer. Looking at the
following graph, you can clearly see unusual memory growth. This is a
database server running Postgres 9.0.0.
http://mediafly-public.s3.amazonaws.com/dbcluster02-master-month.png
We have another server, running Postgres 9.0.1
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ben Chobot be...@silentmedia.com wrote:
Any advice? What should I be looking for?
Any particular reason you are running the OOM killer on a database server?
Why have the kernel set to overcommit memory in the first place?
Simply an oversight. That being
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
I have used PostgreSQL 9.0 + pgpool-II 3.0 and they work fine with md5
auth. Your log seems to indicate that the password in pool_passwd and
the one in pg_shadow are not identical. Can you verify that?
The query result:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
I have used PostgreSQL 9.0 + pgpool-II 3.0 and they work fine with md5
auth. Your log seems to indicate that the password in pool_passwd
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm sorry, when I went back over to double check my steps I realized I ran
the wrong command. I am *still* having the problem. It appears that the
MD5 hashes now match, but it's still failing. I have postgres
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Unfortunately the gdb backtrace does not show enough information
because of optimization, I guess. Can you take a backtrace with
optimization disabled binary?
You can obtain this by editing Makefile around line 147.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Sorry for delay. I had a trip outside Japan.
No problem.
I found nasty bug with pgpool. Please try attached patches.
I tried the patch file and I still cannot connect. The only other
difference is that I've already
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Sorry for not enough description about pool_passwd. It's located under
the same directory as pgpool.conf. So the default is
/usr/local/etc/pool_passwd.
You need to create /usr/local/etc/pool_passwd if the uid to run
I can't get md5 authentication working with postgres 9rc1 and pgpool-II 3.0.
I see references to pool_passwd in the pgpool documentation, but I see
nothing indicating *where* this file should exist and how pgpool finds it.
I've set my accounts up in pcp.conf, however, I do not believe this is
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Try doing a binary search with LIMIT. E.g., if you have 20M reecords,
do a SELECT * FROM ... LIMIT 10M. (throw away the results) If that
broke, check the upper half, if not, check the lower one (with
OFFSET).
If you
I'm running into this issue again:
psql --version
psql (PostgreSQL) 8.3.7
COPY items_extended TO '/dev/null';
ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 25693266 in pg_toast_25497233
Unfortunately, I do not know where these are coming from and I cannot
replicate the data in at least one of
We have a production database that contains data which is easily
recreated at runtime. I'm considering upgrading this to 9.0 beta1 to
get some experience with the new hot standby system on a server that
is under medium to heavy load.
Obviously, being a production database, it's inconvenient if
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
What do you mean by an instance failure here? The actual EC2 image getting
corrupted so that it won't boot anymore, or just the instance going down
badly?
The instance going down, badly. The last time it happened, what
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Nikhil G. Daddikar wrote:
I was wondering if any of you are using (or tried to use) PG+EC2/EBS on a
production system. Are any best-practices. Googling didn't help much. A few
articles I came across scared me a bit.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
If there's another server around, you can have your archive_command on the
master ship to two systems, then use the second one as a way to jump-start
this whole process. After fail-over, just start shipping from the new
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ogden li...@darkstatic.com wrote:
I have looked all over but could not find any detailed docs on setting up a
warm standby solution using PostgreSQL 8.4. I do know of
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/warm-standby.html but was
wondering if there was a
We had a hardware failure last week and had to switch over to our spare.
Unfortunately, at some point we managed to get some data corruption. I've
been going through the database table by table, record by record, trying to
find the problems and fix them.
This one has me stumped. We have one
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Bryan Murphybmurphy1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've identified 82 bad records. When I try to query for the records,
we get the following:
ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value
Could I run pg_resetxlog on a warm spare? Would that give the same result?
Unfortunately, this is our production system and I simply cannot bring it
down at the moment to run pg_resetxlog.
Bryan
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:23
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.com writes:
Here's the xmin/xmax/ctid for three problematic records:
prodpublic=# select xmin,xmax,ctid from items_extended where id in
('34537ed90d7546d78f2c172fc8eed687
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Hm, what's your current XID counter? (pg_controldata would give an
approximate answer.) I'm wondering
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
For what it's worth at EDB I dealt with another case like this and I
imagine others have too. I think it's too easy to do things in the
wrong order or miss a step and end up with these kinds of problems.
I would really like
PM, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming we are running a Postgres instance that is shipping log files to 2
or more warm spares, is there a way I can fail over to one of the spares,
and have the second spare start receiving updates from the new master
without missing a beat? I can
Assuming we are running a Postgres instance that is shipping log files to 2
or more warm spares, is there a way I can fail over to one of the spares,
and have the second spare start receiving updates from the new master
without missing a beat? I can live with losing the old master, and at least
Hey guys, I'm having difficulty restoring some of our backups. Luckily, I'm
only trying to do this to bring up a copy of our database for testing
purposes, but this still has me freaked out because it means we currently
have no valid backups and are only running with a single warm spare.
Our
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2009, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.com wrote:
What am I doing wrong? FYI, we're running 8.3.7.
See the documentation on PITR backups for how to do this correctly.
I've read through the PITR
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Bryan Murphy bmurphy1...@gmail.comwrote:
I've read through the PITR documentation many times. I do not see anything
that sheds light on what I'm doing wrong, and I've restored older backups
successfully many times in the past few months using this technique
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The database is performing too frequent restartpoints.
This has been optimised in PostgreSQL 8.4 by the addition of the
bgwriter running during recovery. This will mean that your hot spare
will not pause while waiting
I have two hot-spare databases that use wal archiving and continuous
recovery mode. I want to minimize recovery time when we have to fail
over to one of our hot spares. Right now, I'm seeing the following
behavior which makes a quick recovery seem problematic:
(1) hot spare applies 70 to 75 wal
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com wrote:
What does vmstat say about the bi/bo during this time period? It sounds
like the volume of random I/O produced by recovery is just backing up as
expected. Some quick math:
I'll have to capture this, unfortunately I won't
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com wrote:
1) Decrease the maximum possible segment backlog so you can never get
this
far behind
I understand conceptually what you are saying, but I don't know how to
practically realize this. :) Do you mean lower
Hey guys, we just moved our system to Amazon's EC2 service. I'm a bit
paranoid about backups, and this environment is very different than
our previous environment. I was hoping you guys could point out any
major flaws in our backup strategy that I may have missed.
A few assumptions:
1. It's OK
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
1. It's OK if we lose a few seconds (or even minutes) of transactions
should one of our primary databases crash.
2. It's unlikely we'll need to load a backup that's more than a few days
old.
How do you handle failover and
Hey guys, we're changing the way we version our database from some old
unsupported (and crappy) ruby migrations-like methodology to straight
SQL scripts. We currently run CruiseControl.NET on a windows machine
pointed to a test database server hosted on linux for our builds. At
each build we
I'm a bit of a novice writing tsearch2 queries, so forgive me if this
is a basic question.
We have a table with 2million+ records which has a considerable amount
of text content. Some search terms (such as comedy, new, news, music,
etc.) cause a significant performance hit on our web site.
On Dec 5, 2007 9:49 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only access-share locks, but that could still be an issue if anything in
your system likes to take exclusive locks. Have you looked into
pg_locks to see if anything's getting blocked?
pg_dump is entirely capable of causing an
On Dec 6, 2007 10:09 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why dump such a table at all? It evidently doesn't contain any
data you need to preserve ...
I forget which version you are running, but 8.2 pg_dump has an
--exclude-table switch which'd work peachy for this.
I did not know about
When we run pg_dump on our database, our web site becomes completely
unresponsive. I thought pg_dump was runnable while the database was
still being actively used? Anyway, I'm not entirely sure why, but
here's what I'm seeing.
pg_dump -v database_name | gzip output_file
25% to 50% CPU usage (4
Sorry about the formatting, here's the dump as a text file.
Thanks,
Bryan
On Dec 5, 2007 10:05 AM, Bryan Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we run pg_dump on our database, our web site becomes completely
unresponsive. I thought pg_dump was runnable while the database was
still being
On Dec 5, 2007 10:14 AM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pg_dump uses Access Share if I recall. You can operate normally while
running pg_dump. I am having a hard time parsing that. Could you instead
go over to pgsql.privatepaste.com and send back a paste link?
On 10/17/07, Joao Miguel Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your intention is to eliminate the unused indexes rows you should run
'vaccum' and/or 'vacuum full' and/or 'reindex'.
This also has the consequence of freing filesystem space and returning
it back to the OS.
Check it out here:
Is there a way I can track index usage over a long period of time?
Specifically, I'd like to identify indexes that aren't being regularly
used and drop them.
Bryan
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
First question... did you create the appropriate indexes on the appropriate
columns for these tables? Foreign keys do not implicitly create indexes in
postgres.
Bryan
On 7/30/07, Cultural Sublimation [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm fairly new with Postgresql, so I am not sure if the
I highly recommend you use the Npgsql driver, and if you're feeling really
saucy try NHibernate on top of that.
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/npgsql
http://www.nhibernate.org/
Bryan
On 7/23/07, longlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,all
i have a local system with windows xp.
i want to use c#
where
I have yet to find a lot of guidance on the issue.
Bryan
On 3/29/07, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bryan Murphy wrote:
I think the other guys suggestion will work better. ;)
Really, the table was just an example off the top of my head. I believe
we do use a boolean as the deleted flag. We
Is it possible to declare a unique constraint in combination with a deleted
flag?
For example, if I have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE
(
ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
Key VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,
Value VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,
Deleted INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0
);
can I declare a unique constraint that
Thanks! That works great!
Bryan
On 3/29/07, Jonathan Hedstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bryan Murphy wrote:
Is it possible to declare a unique constraint in combination with a
deleted flag?
For example, if I have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE
(
ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
Key
, Bryan Murphy wrote:
Is it possible to declare a unique constraint in combination with a
deleted flag?
For example, if I have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE
(
ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
Key VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,
Value VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,
Deleted INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0
);
can
51 matches
Mail list logo
