Slightly off topic for this thread... I figured I give it a whirl...
I've often wondered what sort of performance increase one would get by placing
the WAL on a solid-state drive like a 2 or 4GB TiGi. Has anyone tested this
type of setup for a performance gain? For a 2GB drive it runs ~$3000. It
PostgreSQL 7.4.2 ... The tables in question have been vacuumed.
...stepping gingerly into the woods of foreign keys... I need some advice:
Given a foriegn key structure:
table1.p1 uniqueidentifier
table2.p1 uniqueidentifier
table3.p1 uniqueidentifier
table4.p1 uniqueidentifier
table4.q1 uniqueid
COPY works for whole tables, and can't append rows. You're going to have to
escape your linebreaks and tabs to use COPY ... As I recall, you can specify
your own custom column and row delimiters... You might consider creating some
type of primary key for the table. A "serial" column would work fin
You want
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/uniqueidentifier/projdisplay.php
CG
--- Ivar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to generate GUID("f741d0ce-351c-4c8d-9625-d23765ca7f45") values in
> postgre ?
>
>
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)-
For my particular case, word repetition shouldn't be relevant in determining
the rank of a document. If I strip() the vector, I loose what relevance
proximity and weight add to the rank. It seems impossible, yet I ask anyway: Is
it possible to eliminate the second (third, fourth, fifth, etc.) occur
pg_dump: query to get data of sequence "profile_id_seq" returned name
"profiles_id_seq"
I renamed a sequence using PgAdmin II from profiles_id_seq to profile_id_seq.
Any suggestions on getting everything synched to the proper names again?
CG
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SB