Re: [GENERAL] 2.5TB Migration from SATA to SSD disks - PostgreSQL 9.2

2016-09-08 Thread David Gibbons
> > > Isn't this heading in the wrong direction? We need to be more precise > than 0 (since 0 is computed off of rounded/truncated time stamps), not less > precise than 0. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > Hmm, You may be right, reading it 4 more times for comprehension it looks like it should be set to -

Re: [GENERAL] 2.5TB Migration from SATA to SSD disks - PostgreSQL 9.2

2016-09-02 Thread David Gibbons
You can reduce the time much further by pre copying the files. Then during the maintenance window only copy the deltas basically. On Sep 1, 2016 9:43 PM, "Patrick B" wrote: > > > 2016-09-02 15:36 GMT+12:00 Venkata B Nagothi : > >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Patrick B >> wrote: >> >>> H

Re: [GENERAL] 2.5TB Migration from SATA to SSD disks - PostgreSQL 9.2

2016-09-02 Thread David Gibbons
> > > So is that really possible? Just copy the data between folders? if so, > i'll probably chose option 2!!! > Even that is 2.5TB I don't think the copy will take longer than 20 > minutes... and I'd still be able to perform reads... > > I'll do some test to see if option 2 can be done :) > > Than

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

2016-01-06 Thread David Gibbons
Uhm, you mean this one? https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b0bc65729070b9cbdbb53ff042984a3c545a0e34 +If however, anyone feels personally abused, threatened, or otherwise +uncomfortable due to this process, that is not acceptable. If so, +please contact the