Tom Lane wrote:
Geoffrey KRETZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was wondering when a PREPARE statement is check. (ie : is it normal
that the following statement doesn't return an error : PREPARE stmnt AS
"") ?
Hm?
regression=# PREPARE stmnt AS &quo
Hi,
I was wondering when a PREPARE statement is check. (ie : is it normal
that the following statement doesn't return an error : PREPARE stmnt AS
"") ?
Geoffrey Kretz
Four J's Development Tools
---(end of broadcast)--
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:49, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:38, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Hi,
I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4
behaviours.
With PGS 7.2 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) V
Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:38, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Hi,
I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4
behaviours.
With PGS 7.2 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) doesn't fail
With PGS 7.4 :
INSERT INTO t
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:38, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Hi,
I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4
behaviours.
With PGS 7.2 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) doesn't fail
With PGS 7.4 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VA
Hi,
I've got a question about a difference beetween PGS 7.2 and PGS 7.4
behaviours.
With PGS 7.2 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) doesn't fail
With PGS 7.4 :
INSERT INTO table (col1, col2) VALUES (val1) failed
Is it a known bug ?
Thx.
Geoffrey KRETZ
Four J's De
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 18:08:44 +0200,
Geoffrey KRETZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
Is it still possible to find
P.S. The original request was posted as a reply to another thread. This
is not a nice thing to do. It messes up the archives and can hide the
fact that your request is new, causing some people who could have helped you
to ignore it.
I'm sorry for that, I don't mind to bother anyone (I've just r
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/
Sorry for the typo. It should be:
ftp.postg
Hello,
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
Is it still possible to find such an old version of pgs available for
download ?
Thx in advance
Geoffrey Kretz - Four J's Develop
Richard Huxton wrote:
Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
I've a table temp_tab with 5 fields (f1,f2,f3,...),and I'm a
launching the following request :
INSERT INTO temp_tab VALUES (1,2,3)
It will insert the values in the three first row whereas with
informix or db2 for exemple, it will return an
Richard Huxton wrote:
Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
Hello,
Is it a way to make the following UPDATE statement work with PGS 7.4
(UNIX) :
UPDATE dbit2 SET (dbit2_key,dbit2_c10,dbit2_vc200) =
(ABS(-1),NULL,'xx') WHERE dbit2_key=1
Or am I force to use the following syntax :
UPDATE dbit2 SET
bit2_vc200 =
'xx' WHERE dbit2_key=1
Geoffrey KRETZ - Four J's Development Tools
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
ow whereas with informix
or db2 for exemple, it will return an error.
So is that normal ?
Geoffrey Kretz - Four J's Development Tools
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregi
14 matches
Mail list logo
