[GENERAL] Using Postgres with Latin1 (ISO8859-1) and Unicode (utf-8) character sets.

2004-11-08 Thread J. Michael Crawford
I am posting this to the General and JDBC groups so that it's in the archive -- I know many people have had problems with Latin1 characters, and I'd like to share what has worked for us. If anyone can add this information to a more permanent FAQ, I'd be much obliged. --- Using Postgres with

Re: [GENERAL] [JDBC] Using Postgres with Latin1 (ISO8859-1)

2004-11-08 Thread J. Michael Crawford
: On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, J. Michael Crawford wrote: Even in Java, where you can do all sorts of character-encoding translation, it can be impossible to translate data retrieved from Postgres if it's in the wrong encoding. We've tried changing the JVM encoding, altering the jdbc driver

Re: [GENERAL] [JDBC] Using Postgres with Latin1 (ISO8859-1)

2004-11-08 Thread J. Michael Crawford
anything that covered all the bases. If there's a way to remove/correct/comment my posting, I'm fine with that. - Mike At 04:55 PM 11/8/2004, Oliver Jowett wrote: J. Michael Crawford wrote: Encoding translations that didn't work: a) Getting encoded bytes from the result set. We tried

Re: [GENERAL] UTF-8 - ISO8859-1 conversion problem

2004-10-29 Thread J. Michael Crawford
In my experience, there are just some characters that don't want to be converted, even if they appear to be part of the normal 8-bit character system. We went to Unicode databases to hold our Latin1 characters because of this. There was even a case where the client was cutting and pasting

Re: [GENERAL] UTF-8 - ISO8859-1 conversion problem

2004-10-29 Thread J. Michael Crawford
Correction: Four things that need to be done, THREE if you're not serving up html. Sorry for the editing error. - Mike At 01:19 PM 10/29/2004, J. Michael Crawford wrote: In my experience, there are just some characters that don't want to be converted, even if they appear to be part