This affirmation that it indeed does work set me straight. I inadvertently made
a previously immutable UUID function volatile; it was providing the UUIDs in
the query.
> On Nov 9, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Kevin Wooten writes:
>> I am assuming I am crazy and mi
I am assuming I am crazy and missing something completely obvious but I cannot
get postgres (9.3.5) to use an index on a UUID, ever.
The main table has a natural composite key (2 uuids and a timestamp) with which
it always uses the timestamp as the index condition and filters on the UUIDs.
Th
Regardless of type used… the driver and server should agree on the results.
On Jan 3, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
>> Only thing I can think of is the JDBC driver and Postgres have a difference
>> of opinion on the precision of
> On 11/22/2013 2:27 PM, Kevin Wooten wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wooten wrote:
>>
>>> My apologies for posting what is almost certainly somewhat of a repeat
>>> question but I have searched and attempted everything I can think of and
>&g
On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wooten wrote:
> My apologies for posting what is almost certainly somewhat of a repeat
> question but I have searched and attempted everything I can think of and
> cannot figure it out myself.
>
> The basic question is… Is it possible to g
My apologies for posting what is almost certainly somewhat of a repeat question
but I have searched and attempted everything I can think of and cannot figure
it out myself.
The basic question is… Is it possible to get a scrollable cursor that, within a
transaction, can insert/update/delete rows
