Re: [GENERAL] Case insensitive collation

2013-01-21 Thread Marcel van Pinxteren
As I mentioned in my original post, I don't want to use citext or lower(). I tested on Windows, but as I mentioned in one of my first posts, collation and case sensitivity are separate things. With this, we are back at the beginning of the circle, so I'll leave it there. Maybe I'll check back in

Re: [GENERAL] Case insensitive collation

2013-01-21 Thread Marcel van Pinxteren
To be honest, the reason I don't want to use citext and lower(), is me being lazy. If I have to use these features, there is more work for me converting from SQL Server to Postgresql. I have to make more changes to my database, and more to my software. But, developers are generally lazy, so you

Re: [GENERAL] Case insensitive collation

2013-01-18 Thread Marcel van Pinxteren
Desired behaviour: 1. If there is a row with 'ABC' (in a unique column) in the table, a row with 'abc' should not be allowed 2. If I do SELECT * FROM aTable WHERE aColumn = 'ABC', I should see a row with 'abc' as well (if there is one in the table) This has been described in this mailing list a

[GENERAL] Case insensitive collation

2013-01-16 Thread Marcel van Pinxteren
(with 122 tables). Regards, Marcel van Pinxteren

Re: [GENERAL] Case insensitive collation

2013-01-16 Thread Marcel van Pinxteren
to investigate). Met vriendelijke groet, Marcel van Pinxteren -- Volg onze bouw op http://nieuwekampen.blogspot.com On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Marcel van Pinxteren marcel.van.pinxte...@gmail.com writes: Therefore the question