BINGO. Noticed that, too.
Guess all the energy was used getting up on the high horse.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:09 PM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: Bob Pawley; Jaime Casanova; Dr NoName;
From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
...125. Intel has designed its compiler purposely to degrade performance when
a program
is run on an AMD platform. To achieve this, Intel designed the compiler to
compile code
along several alternate code paths. Some paths
Just a short,terse list:
Don't use nondefault optimization. There is something going on
with the code that breaks, runtime, when compiled (which works
fine per se) with higher optimization levels. IPA is a real
difficulty.
Remember to set OBJECT_MODE=64 in OS env!
upgrading m4/autoconf and
PROTECTED] (Mohan, Ross) writes:
It would be worthwhile to try to formulate this as a patch to the FAQ_AIX file.
Probably something like
PostgreSQL 8 on AIX 5.3, compiled using VisualAge C
--
- Use only default optimization. Higher optimization
Wow, you mean mail besides my own is considering to be junk?
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:46 PM
To: pgsql-announce@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org;
:
Subject:Re: [GENERAL] Fast request for version checking
Oops! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohan, Ross) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
I have 2.53, yes.
But, I am going to rebuild and re-AC this, so need
to build m4 (1.4.3) in order to get to 2.59 of AConf.
Any reasons to strongly advocate
(ANSI compliant or not) with all
builds.
An RTFM pointer to a doc would be more than ample,
if such explanation already exists!
Thanks!!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 27-May-05 8:35 PM
To: Mohan, Ross
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Folks,
if you go to the root of your postgresql distro
and type
./configure --version
what version of AutoConf was used?
thanks!
--Ross
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
After 5 seconds of intense thought, I suggest that you
check the privileges on your compiler stuff.
Please keep posting and let us know how you fared.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aly Dharshi
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 4:12 PM
Slony is the master-slave (not multi-master IIRC) replication environment.
I haven't used it, but apparently there are cognoscenti among us who have.
I would think, a bit, about what kind of load (e.g. CPU, network, disk
queues, disk allocation, et cetera) you want to balance before picking up
while we're on scalability, any thoughts on needs/plans for 64-bit PG?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL]
LOL! (thanks)
Redfaced, and going back to check compiler flags,
-- Ross
-Original Message-
From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:42 PM
To: Mohan, Ross
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs Firebird?
Mohan
It's nice, but...it couldn't possibly be more subjective, and his ranking
of documentation as 5 out of 10 is funny. He apparently did not even find
these many hosted listservs (only Usenet). shrug
I hope he enjoys his ongoing reviews; I suppose it can't hurt?
-Original Message-
From:
w/o reading the URL docs, it sounds suspiciously like tagged command queueing
for sequential scans.
pause for comedic effect
I wonder what the best way to spend $7K for performance improvement might be?
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Richly deserved IMNSHO. my current employer was bilked for many many months
for a piece of crap E10K that barely outperforms a couple of AMD chips. But
at many, many times the price. We finally upgraded/migrated to AIX/g5 chips
and run what was run on 20 cpus on 2.
If Sun pulls out of its slow
Subject says it all...I've got to do this soon, and since I would
like PG to take over this company like a VIRUS, I'd like this rollout
to go *very* well.
Any comments, caveats, encomiums, exhortations, anecdotes, war stories,
gentle assurances and pointers of all sorts most welcome.
- Ross
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
To: Mohan, Ross
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Oracle Migration. Don't Care about the Corbomite Maneuver, Spock.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 00:35:25 -,
Mohan, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any pointers?
The online
Hello Postgres'ers,
Oracle newbie to PG here, curious about best books and online
resources. A *lot* of what I am finding in google is one to four
year old p*ssing contest with MySQL vs. Postgres (don't care)
or Why doesn't PostGres support five level hypergalactic triple ACID
Phase Inverters on
18 matches
Mail list logo
