Re: [GENERAL] Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ?

2013-11-30 Thread Noel Diaz
Thomas, RIGHT ON! Sometimes I have seen this feature used to hide multiple round trips and intermediate result processing from the clients Some others is simply because the client is generating a predefined data structure that has little resemblance to the schema and this "feature" becomes conv

Re: [GENERAL] Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ?

2013-11-30 Thread Noel Diaz
lder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.db2.udb.apdv.java.doc%2Fdoc%2Ftjvjdmlt.htm Hopefully I shed some light in my incomplete description Thank you for the prompt reply, Noeldr On Saturday, November 30, 2013 4:33 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote: On 30 Nov 2013, at

[GENERAL] Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ?

2013-11-30 Thread Noel Diaz
Hi, My firm is considering a very large move from PAID RDBMS to Postgresql.  The lack of full support for Stored Procedures is currently a deal breaker. We use many features, like: - output parameters - Callable statements to call the procs - Multiple result sets - nested procedure calls Is ther