Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Christian Marschalek writes:
well i ment over apache (with php) to a database :o)
Apache encrypts the connection to the web user, PostgreSQL encrypts the
connection to the database user, which in this case would be Apache.
I.e.:
Web user ---SSL--- Apache ---SSL---
Jarmo Paavilainen wrote:
Just curious, what kind of tables did you set up in MySQL? My
Ehh... there are more than one kind... I did not know. Still with
transactions on PostgreSQL (unsafe method?) MySQL was 2 times as fast as
PostgreSQL. I will check this out, and return to this list with
John Burski wrote:
I really don't understand why people expect computers to do everything
for them, the burden of using tools properly belongs to the user.
Let the congregation say "Amen!"
The counterpoints:
(Complex tool)
A car comes assembled, from the factory, tuned to accelerate, and
Andrew Evans wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:43:32AM -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
I'm a bit late on this thread, but I'm currently wranging a large
set of migrations:
postgreSQL- Oracle
Would you mind explaining why your company's migrating a PostgreSQL
database to Oracle? I'm hoping
Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 04:27:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-2000-05/lw-05-database.html
It mentions PostgreSQL. I was interviewed for the article.
Nice article, but the author should get some facst straight.
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
MySQL is great for small websites with small budgets with read-only data
or data that doesn't change often. It doesn't scale very well at all, and
for larger sites it really falls apart without anyy referential integrity
or supprto for views. But beyond that, you
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
Well, you have binaries for NT, but what about home users/developers on 95?
98? mySQL even does OS/2. Really.
For home use/development, run either Linux or FreeBSD in another partition on
your Win9x machine. Or, even use one
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2000-01-14, Alfred Perlstein mentioned:
issue: how to secure cgi's that access postgres
problem: passwords for postgres database are stored
in plain text in scripts. (lets assume, perl,
not a compiled language)
points:
make
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Ron Chmara [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000116 16:18] wrote:
Snip_ Of security items.
All these options don't take into account that perhaps you don't
want people _on the same box_
Well, I assumed that web clients, using cgi, was the "Subject:",
so I didn'
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Huynh, Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 2:16 AM
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Intro/Win9X
Well, is there NT version for evaluation?
Well, there's no PostgreSQL evaluation. And what is
Robert wrote:
Hi,
one of the important factors that contributed to the popularity and success of
Apache, Perl, Tcl/Tk etc. was their platform independence. I'm big fan of Unix (and
even bigger of Postgres ;-), but BeOS, MacOS X, even Win2000 all look quite
interesting too and I don't want
11 matches
Mail list logo
