Mike,
thanks for pointing me to the "Template Pattern Modifier" ,-)) I've just
found it in the doc with your help and it works now perfectly.
Thanks,
Soeren
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 04:17:52PM +0200, Soeren Gerlach wrote:
>
> > I've an integer column i
' 99 99'), ' MM DD')
results in a timestamp "2171-11-05 22:00:00" ??? The int-to-char
conversion works well ("2004 12 17") but the to_timestamp() doesn't work
as expected - why?
I&#x
h
Postgres but more with a general approach. If you decide to switch from
Linux to Solaris (or other way round) in some time you get likely lots of
work to do if you now stay to a specific solution.
Best regards,
Soeren Gerlach
---(end of broadcast)-
> Soeren Gerlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * pg_dump takes 2/3 of the [single] CPU, postmaster the other 1/3 for
> > both dumps
>
> Really!? Hmm, that seems fairly backwards ... thinks ...
>
> In the -Fc case this makes some amount of sense because pg_dump
= 3
sort_mem = 1000
vacuum_mem = 16384
What is the best starting point to look at? I'm sure I'm doing something
badly wrong but neither the docs nor some older mails from this group seem
to offer a hint to me.
Thanks a lot,
Soeren Gerlach
--
