Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump-restore concurrency

2010-07-21 Thread paladine
ob (inserting data) Craig Ringer wrote: > > On 21/07/10 19:26, paladine wrote: >> >> Hi all >> I prefer doing pg_dump - psql restore to vacuum full and >> is there anyone know whether postgresql can insert data concurrently >> while >> restoring a ta

[GENERAL] pg_dump-restore concurrency

2010-07-21 Thread paladine
Hi all I prefer doing pg_dump - psql restore to vacuum full and is there anyone know whether postgresql can insert data concurrently while restoring a table for not losing any data. thanks in advance... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/pg_dump-restore-concurrency-tp29224

Re: re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-27 Thread paladine
mn to integer again ? Vick Khera wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:16 AM, paladine wrote: >> Anyone know another method ? >> > > options to reclaim disk space: > > vacuum full > dump/restore (sometimes faster than vacuum full) > cluster (not mvcc safe a

Re: re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-27 Thread paladine
' and then run ' vacuum analyse verbose ' In your opinion, Is autovacuuming more efficient way ? Steve Crawford wrote: > > On 05/26/2010 07:16 AM, paladine wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> How can I reduce disk space postgresql used ? >> I tried to del

Re: re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-27 Thread paladine
ce though I run this command 'delete from db ' ? Thom Brown wrote: > > On 26 May 2010 15:50, paladine wrote: >> >> It is default value ( #checkpoint_segments = 3    # in logfile segments, >> min >> 1, 16MB each ) >> Many of my database configu

Re: re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-26 Thread paladine
using shell scripts ( when the disk filled up I delete it from db etc. ) Steve Crawford wrote: > > On 05/26/2010 07:50 AM, paladine wrote: >> It is default value ( #checkpoint_segments = 3# in logfile segments, >> min >> 1, 16MB each ) >> Many of my database con

Re: re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-26 Thread paladine
sed object (1GB size) These are maybe normal operations but I don't understand that although I delete many rows from my db and regularly vacuum , reindexing operations, how doesn't postgresql give back that deleted areas for reusing. Thom Brown wrote: > > On 26 May 2010 15:16,

re[GENERAL] ducing postgresql disk space

2010-05-26 Thread paladine
Hi all, How can I reduce disk space postgresql used ? I tried to delete many rows from my database and I am running ' vacuum analyze reindexdb ' commands regularly but my disk space on my linux machine didn't reduce. I know that ' vacuum full ' command can do that but I don't want to use that