Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:26:26PM +0100, PFC wrote:
It seems that contrib/intagg crashes my server :
I see the same thing with PostgreSQL 8.0.0 (REL8_0_STABLE) on Solaris 9
and FreeBSD 4.11.
The intagg source code says
NOTE: This module requires
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think it is an internal thing with gcc that the size of a pointer and
sizeof(int) are always the same, regardless of machine word size...
with a 64-bit binary, sizeof(int) and sizeof(void *) should both be 8,
which still causes them to be equal.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:22:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:26:26PM +0100, PFC wrote:
It seems that contrib/intagg crashes my server :
I see the same thing with PostgreSQL 8.0.0 (REL8_0_STABLE) on Solaris 9
and FreeBSD
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm...the PostgreSQL binaries on my Solaris/sparc box are 32-bit
and the FreeBSD box is a 32-bit i386, yet both are susceptible to
the crash.
On looking at it, the problem is that the functions are defined in such
a way that you can pass any random
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:00:06PM -0500, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
I think it is an internal thing with gcc that the size of a pointer and
sizeof(int) are always the same, regardless of machine word size...
with a 64-bit binary, sizeof(int) and sizeof(void *) should both be 8,
which
Frank D. Engel, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it is an internal thing with gcc that the size of a pointer and
sizeof(int) are always the same, regardless of machine word size...
with a 64-bit binary, sizeof(int) and sizeof(void *) should both be 8,
which still causes them to be
Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
I think it is an internal thing with gcc that the size of a pointer
and
sizeof(int) are always the same, regardless of machine word size...
with a 64-bit binary, sizeof(int) and sizeof(void *) should both be 8,
which still causes them to be equal.
On AMD64, gcc
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:07:39PM -0600, Guy Rouillier wrote:
Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
I think it is an internal thing with gcc that the size of a pointer
and
sizeof(int) are always the same, regardless of machine word size...
with a 64-bit binary, sizeof(int) and sizeof(void *)