On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
> > not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
>
> Yes, since 7.4.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
> H
>
> Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
> not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
Yes, since 7.4.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
"Ker
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:39:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yeah. But it has been declared dead by the Kerberos folks
> > (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-7.html. And this
> > document is from 2000, an dit was declared already
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah. But it has been declared dead by the Kerberos folks
> (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-7.html. And this
> document is from 2000, an dit was declared already then)...
Right. The real question here is who's going to be usin
> > Last chance for any Kerberos 4 users to speak up --- otherwise I'll
> > apply this soon.
>
> If you just want someone to test it I can do that. I don't
> actually use it normally though.
I don't think "just testing" is enough - somebody needs to actually
maintain it...
> As far as securi
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Last chance for any Kerberos 4 users to speak up --- otherwise I'll
> apply this soon.
If you just want someone to test it I can do that. I don't actually use it
normally though.
As far as security issues the only issues I'm aware of is a) it uses plain DES
