On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
Yes, since 7.4.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:39:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah. But it has been declared dead by the Kerberos folks
(http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-7.html. And this
document is from 2000, an dit was declared already then)...
Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
Yes, since 7.4.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last chance for any Kerberos 4 users to speak up --- otherwise I'll
apply this soon.
If you just want someone to test it I can do that. I don't actually use it
normally though.
As far as security issues the only issues I'm aware of is a) it uses plain DES
Last chance for any Kerberos 4 users to speak up --- otherwise I'll
apply this soon.
If you just want someone to test it I can do that. I don't
actually use it normally though.
I don't think just testing is enough - somebody needs to actually
maintain it...
As far as security issues
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah. But it has been declared dead by the Kerberos folks
(http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-7.html. And this
document is from 2000, an dit was declared already then)...
Right. The real question here is who's going to be using a
